The Perfection of Wisdom in Twenty-Five Thousand Lines
Chapter 26: The Hells
Toh 9
Degé Kangyur, vol. 26 (shes phyin, nyi khri, ka), folios 1.b–382.a; vol. 27 (shes phyin, nyi khri, kha), folios 1.b–393.a; and vol. 28 (shes phyin, nyi khri, ga), folios 1.b–381.a
Imprint
Translated by the Padmakara Translation Group
under the patronage and supervision of 84000: Translating the Words of the Buddha
First published 2023
Current version v 1.1.13 (2024)
Generated by 84000 Reading Room v2.26.1
84000: Translating the Words of the Buddha is a global non-profit initiative to translate all the Buddha’s words into modern languages, and to make them available to everyone.
This work is provided under the protection of a Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND (Attribution - Non-commercial - No-derivatives) 3.0 copyright. It may be copied or printed for fair use, but only with full attribution, and not for commercial advantage or personal compensation. For full details, see the Creative Commons license.
Table of Contents
Summary
The Perfection of Wisdom in Twenty-Five Thousand Lines is among the most important scriptures underlying both the “vast” and the “profound” approaches to Buddhist thought and practice. Known as the “middle-length” version, being the second longest of the three long Perfection of Wisdom sūtras, it fills three volumes of the Kangyur. Like the two other long sūtras, it records the major teaching on the perfection of wisdom given by the Buddha Śākyamuni on Vulture Peak, detailing all aspects of the path to enlightenment while at the same time emphasizing how bodhisattvas must put them into practice without taking them—or any aspects of enlightenment itself—as having even the slightest true existence.
Acknowledgements
Translation by the Padmakara Translation Group. A complete draft by Gyurme Dorje was first edited by Charles Hastings, then revised and further edited by John Canti. The introduction was written by John Canti. We are grateful for the advice and help received from Gareth Sparham, Greg Seton, and Nathaniel Rich.
This translation is dedicated to the memory of our late colleague, long-time friend, and vajra brother Gyurme Dorje (1950–2020), who worked assiduously on this translation in his final years and into the very last months of his life. We would also like to express our gratitude to his wife, Xiaohong, for the extraordinary support she gave him on so many levels.
The translation was completed under the patronage and supervision of 84000: Translating the Words of the Buddha.
The generous sponsorship of Kris Yao and Xiang-Jen Yao, which helped make the work on this translation possible, is most gratefully acknowledged.
Text Body
Chapter 26: The Hells
Then the venerable Śāradvatīputra asked the Blessed One, “Blessed Lord, where did those bodhisattva great beings who are resolute in this profound perfection of wisdom pass away before coming into this world? For how long have those noble sons or noble daughters embarked on unsurpassed, complete enlightenment? How many tathāgatas, arhats, completely awakened buddhas have they honored? {Ki.II-III: 149} Are they genuinely and methodically397 resolute in this profound perfection of wisdom? How long have they practiced the perfection of generosity? How long have they practiced the perfection of ethical discipline, the perfection of tolerance, the perfection of perseverance, [F.170.a] the perfection of meditative concentration, and the perfection of wisdom?”
“Śāradvatīputra,” replied the Blessed One, “those bodhisattva great beings have come into this world, and have been reborn in this world, after venerating immeasurable, countless tathāgatas, arhats, completely awakened buddhas, throughout the world systems of the ten directions. Śāradvatīputra, those bodhisattva great beings have practiced the perfection of generosity, the perfection of ethical discipline, the perfection of tolerance, the perfection of perseverance, the perfection of meditative concentration, and the perfection of wisdom for countless, immeasurable, and inestimable hundred billion trillions of eons. Over countless, immeasurable, and inestimable hundred billion trillions of eons, they have entered upon unsurpassed, complete enlightenment. That is to say, from the time when they first began to set their mind on enlightenment onward, they have practiced the perfection of generosity and then come into this world. [Similarly], they have practiced the perfection of ethical discipline, the perfection of tolerance, the perfection of perseverance, the perfection of meditative concentration, and the perfection of wisdom, and then come into this world. From that time onward they have venerated countless, immeasurable, inestimable, inconceivable, and incomparable tathāgatas, arhats, completely awakened buddhas, and then come into this world and taken rebirth in it. Śāradvatīputra, when those bodhisattva great beings see or hear this perfection of wisdom, they will think, ‘I have seen the Teacher.’ They will think, ‘I have heard the Teacher.’ Śāradvatīputra, those bodhisattva great beings [F.170.b] will pursue this perfection of wisdom, genuinely and methodically, in a nondual manner and without apprehending anything.”398
Thereupon, the venerable Subhūti asked the Blessed One, “Blessed Lord, can the perfection of wisdom be heard or seen?”
“Subhūti, that is not the case!” replied the Blessed One. “Subhūti, the perfection of wisdom is not heard and it is not seen. Even the nature of the perfection of wisdom is neither heard nor seen. Owing to the inanimate nature of phenomena, they neither hear nor see the perfection of wisdom. Similarly, owing to the inanimate nature of phenomena, they neither hear nor see the perfection of meditative concentration, the perfection of perseverance, the perfection of tolerance, the perfection of ethical discipline, or the perfection of generosity. Owing to the inanimate nature of phenomena, they neither hear nor see the emptiness of internal phenomena. Owing to the inanimate nature of phenomena, they neither hear nor see [the other aspects of emptiness], up to and including the emptiness of the essential nature of nonentities. Owing to the inanimate nature of phenomena, they neither hear nor see the applications of mindfulness. Owing to the inanimate nature of phenomena, they neither hear nor see the correct exertions, the supports for miraculous ability, the faculties, the powers, the branches of enlightenment, or the noble eightfold path. Owing to the inanimate nature of phenomena, they neither hear nor see the truths of the noble ones, the meditative concentrations, the immeasurable attitudes, the formless absorptions, the aspects of liberation, the serial steps of meditative absorption, emptiness, signlessness, wishlessness, or the extrasensory powers. Owing to the inanimate nature of phenomena, they neither hear nor see the meditative stabilities, the dhāraṇī gateways, the powers of the tathāgatas, [F.171.a] the fearlessnesses, the kinds of exact knowledge, or the eighteen distinct qualities of the buddhas. Owing to the inanimate nature of phenomena, they neither hear nor see the fruit of entering the stream to nirvāṇa. Owing to the inanimate nature of phenomena, they neither hear nor see the fruit of being destined for only one more rebirth, the fruit of no longer being subject to rebirth, arhatship, or individual enlightenment. Owing to the inanimate nature of phenomena, they neither hear nor see knowledge of the path, enlightenment, the buddhas, or the attributes of the buddhas.” [B38]
“Blessed Lord, how long have bodhisattva great beings who persevere in this profound perfection of wisdom engaged in its practice?” {Ki.II-III: 150}
“Subhūti,” replied the Blessed One, “here there is a distinction that must be explained. Subhūti, there are some bodhisattva great beings who, commencing from the time when they first begin to set their mind on enlightenment, persevere in this profound perfection of wisdom without apprehending anything, and [similarly] persevere in the perfection of meditative concentration, the perfection of perseverance, the perfection of tolerance, the perfection of ethical discipline, and the perfection of generosity. They do not abandon anything at all because they see neither increase nor decrease. They are never separated from the six perfections, and they are never separated from the lord buddhas. They will even accomplish those roots of virtuous action by which they seek to serve, respect, honor, and worship the lord buddhas, simply by setting their minds upon them. [F.171.b] They travel from buddhafield to buddhafield and are never reborn in the womb of a mother. They are never separated from the extrasensory powers and they do not associate with afflicted mental states. They do not coexist with the mindsets of the śrāvakas or pratyekabuddhas. They are styled as bringing beings to maturity, refining the buddhafields and traveling from buddhafield to buddhafield. Subhūti, such bodhisattva great beings persevere in this profound perfection of wisdom.
“On the other hand, Subhūti, there are some noble sons or noble daughters following the vehicle of the bodhisattvas who have seen many hundreds of buddhas, many thousands of buddhas, many hundred million trillions of buddhas, and who, in their presence, have given gifts, maintained ethical discipline, cultivated tolerance, undertaken perseverance, developed meditative concentration, and cultivated wisdom, all by way of apprehending. When this profound perfection of wisdom was being revealed, they departed elsewhere from the assembly. When this profound perfection of wisdom was being revealed, those noble sons or noble daughters following the vehicle of the bodhisattvas departed elsewhere from the presence of those lord buddhas, without honoring them. If you ask why, it is because those noble sons or noble daughters following the vehicle of the bodhisattvas, who departed elsewhere from the assembly when this profound perfection of wisdom was being revealed, even at the present time depart elsewhere from the assembly when this profound perfection of wisdom is revealed. They do not practice harmoniously, with body and mind. [F.172.a] They have accrued deeds that obscure wisdom. By engaging in and accruing deeds that obscure wisdom, when this profound perfection of wisdom is revealed, they abandon it. By abandoning this perfection of wisdom they abandon the all-aspect omniscience of the lord buddhas of the past, the future, and the present. Those who have engaged in and accrued deeds that emerge from the abandoning of all-aspect omniscience have engaged in and accrued deeds that are destitute of the Dharma. Those who have engaged in and accrued deeds that are destitute of the Dharma will roast399 among the denizens of the hells for many years, for many hundreds of years, {Ki.II-III: 151} for many thousands of years, and for many hundred billion trillions of years.
“Then they will proceed from being denizens of great hells to being denizens of more great hells, and, when they proceed from being denizens of great hells to being denizens of more great hells, they will be destroyed by infernos, they will be destroyed by water, and they will be destroyed by wind. Even when they are destroyed in that manner by infernos, when they are destroyed by water or destroyed by wind, they will be cast among the denizens of the great hells in other world systems. They will be cast there and burned there. Even having been cast there and reborn there, they will proceed from being denizens of great hells to being denizens of more great hells, and when they proceed from being denizens of great hells to being denizens of more great hells, they will be destroyed by infernos, they will be destroyed by water, or they will be destroyed by wind. And even when they are destroyed by infernos, destroyed by water, or destroyed by wind in that manner, [F.172.b] they will again be cast among the denizens of the great hells in the eastern direction, and they will be cast among the denizens of the great hells in the southern, western, northern, northeastern, southeastern, southwestern, and northwestern directions, along with the nadir and the zenith. In them, too, they will proceed from being denizens of great hells to being denizens of more great hells, and once again they will be destroyed by infernos, destroyed by water, or destroyed by wind. And when they have been destroyed by infernos, destroyed by water, or destroyed by wind in that manner, they will pass away and be reborn here in this world because their past actions in destroying the Dharma will still not have been exhausted. Yet again they will proceed from the being denizens of great hells to being denizens of more great hells, and having been born there, they will once again experience the sufferings of the denizens of the great hells. There they will endure the sufferings of the denizens of the hells until they have again been destroyed by infernos, destroyed by water, or destroyed by wind.
“Even after they have been destroyed by infernos, destroyed by water, or destroyed by wind, they will pass away and be reborn in the world systems of the eastern direction, equal in fortune to creatures of the animal realms, and they will be reborn in the world systems of the southern, western, northern, northeastern, southeastern, southwestern, and northwestern directions, along with the nadir and the zenith, equal in fortune to creatures of the animal realms.
“Then again, they will be reborn in the worlds of Yama, in the world systems of all the ten directions, and, having been reborn in them, they will experience many sufferings. Once the karma [associated with such sufferings] has been exhausted, even though in some cases they might acquire a human birth, through the ripening of the past actions that they indulged in, accrued, accomplished, completed, and perfected in destroying the Dharma, wherever they are reborn, [F.173.a] they will be born into families of the blind, they will be born into families of refuse scavengers, they will be born into families of outcastes, and they will be born into families of reed makers. Being reborn in those states, they will be blind, lame, without a nose, without a tongue, without arms, without legs, leprous, with white-blotched skin, or decrepit. They will always be reborn in places where the word buddha is nonexistent, where the word Dharma is nonexistent, and where the word saṅgha is nonexistent.”
Then the venerable Śāradvatīputra asked the Blessed One, “Blessed Lord, compared to this indulging in and accruing of deeds that would destroy the Dharma, are not even the five inexpiable crimes no more than a pale reflection?”
“Śāradvatīputra,” replied the Blessed One, “when this profound perfection of wisdom is revealed and explained, they think they should abandon it, saying, ‘We should not train in this! This is not the Dharma! This is not the Vinaya! {Ki.II-III: 152} This is not the teaching of the Teacher! This has not been spoken by the tathāgatas, arhats, completely awakened buddhas!’ They themselves abandon it, and they also render other beings irresolute. They themselves injure their own thoughts, and then injure the thoughts of others. They themselves poison their own thoughts, and then they delight in poisoning the thoughts of others. They themselves have squandered opportunities and they delight in squandering the opportunities of others. They themselves wish to abandon the profound perfection of wisdom owing to their unknowing and ignorance, and they also induce others to do so. Compared to this indulging in and accruing of deeds that would destroy the Dharma, even the five inexpiable crimes are indeed but a pale reflection! [F.173.b]
“Śāradvatīputra, I do not permit such individuals even to hear it, let alone encounter it, let alone associate with it! I do not mention it. If you ask why, Śāradvatīputra, you should know that such individuals defame the Dharma. Śāradvatīputra, you should know that such individuals have bad intentions and they side with evil. Śāradvatīputra, those who think they should hear the words of such individuals, or think they should trust in them, will also be destitute on account of their unseemly fears.
“Śāradvatīputra, you should know that those who defame the perfection of wisdom defame the Dharma. You should know that they become denizens of the hells or the animal realm, or become inhabitants of the world of Yama.”
“Blessed Lord, the Blessed One has not yet spoken of the physical states of those individuals who will be reborn in those inferior realms, having defamed the Dharma.”
“Śāradvatīputra,” replied the Blessed One, “do not speak of the physical states of those individuals who will be reborn in those inferior realms, having defamed the Dharma! If you ask why, anyone hearing the description of the physical states of those individuals who have defamed the Dharma would immediately vomit blood, die, experience life-threatening sufferings, be pained with sorrow, or become shriveled and withered like stalks that have been scythed. If indeed one were to hear the description of the physical states of individuals who are born in these inferior realms, there would be so much evil! Such are their physical states!” With these words, the Blessed One refused to take the opportunity put by the venerable Śāradvatīputra.
“Blessed Lord, so that it will be apparent to living beings of the future, please reveal what sorts of physical bodies will be obtained by individuals who defame the Dharma through having indulged in and accrued the karma that would destroy the Dharma!”
“Śāradvatīputra,” replied [F.174.a] the Blessed One, “those individuals who have indulged in, accrued, completed, perfected, acquired, and fulfilled deeds that would destroy the Dharma will experience sufferings among the denizens of the hells over a long period of time. They will experience sufferings among animals for a long time and they will experience sufferings in the world of Yama for a long time. Such should be made apparent to living beings of the future.”
“Blessed Lord, it will be so! Sugata, it will be so! Blessed Lord, on that very basis, individuals of the spiritual family who are of positive disposition will abandon such errors and they will not abandon the Dharma, even for the sake of their own lives, saying, ‘Would that we might not experience such sufferings!’ ”
Thereupon, the venerable Subhūti said to the Blessed One, {Ki.II-III: 153} “Blessed Lord, if noble sons or noble daughters were to hear this description of the errors of those individuals who abandon the Dharma, they should be absolutely restrained in their physical, verbal, and mental actions, saying, ‘Otherwise we shall experience such sufferings in inferior existences! We shall not behold the tathāgatas. We shall not hear the Dharma. We shall not even respect or venerate the saṅgha. We shall be born in buddhafields where a buddha has not yet appeared. We shall become impoverished. We shall become extremely avaricious!’ and so on.”
Again, the venerable Subhūti addressed the Blessed One: “Blessed Lord, those who have indulged in and accrued negative actions of speech have indulged in and accrued deeds that would destroy the Dharma.”
The Blessed One then said, “Subhūti, those who have indulged in and accrued negative deeds of speech [F.174.b] have indulged in and accrued deeds that would destroy the Dharma. Subhūti, there are deluded persons who intend to defame this perfection of wisdom and intend to reject it. However, these will not go forth according to the Dharma and the Vinaya.400 Subhūti, by defaming and rejecting the perfection of wisdom, they defame and reject the enlightenment of the lord buddhas. By defaming and rejecting the enlightenment of the buddhas, they defame and reject the all-aspect omniscience of the tathāgatas, arhats, completely awakened buddhas of the past, the future, and the present. By defaming and rejecting all-aspect omniscience, they defame and reject the Dharma. By defaming and rejecting the Dharma, they reject the saṅgha. By rejecting the saṅgha, they reject the genuine view concerning the world. By rejecting the genuine view concerning the world, they reject the perfection of generosity, the perfection of ethical discipline, the perfection of tolerance, the perfection of perseverance, the perfection of meditative concentration, and the perfection of wisdom. They reject the emptiness of internal phenomena, and they reject [the other aspects of emptiness], up to and including the emptiness of the essential nature of nonentities. They reject the four applications of mindfulness, and they reject [the other causal attributes], up to and including the noble eightfold path. They reject the four truths of the noble ones, the four meditative concentrations, the four immeasurable attitudes, and the four formless absorptions. They reject the eight aspects of liberation, the nine serial steps of meditative absorption, emptiness, signlessness, wishlessness, and the five extrasensory powers. They reject all the meditative stabilities, [F.175.a] all the dhāraṇī gateways, the ten powers of the tathāgatas, the four fearlessnesses, the four kinds of exact knowledge, and the eighteen distinct qualities of the buddhas. They reject knowledge of all the dharmas, knowledge of the path, and all-aspect omniscience. By rejecting all-aspect omniscience, they acquire an inestimable, incalculable, and immeasurable mass of demerit. By acquiring an inestimable, incalculable, and immeasurable mass of demerit, they experience inestimable, incalculable, and immeasurable sufferings and discomforts among the denizens of the hells, among animals, and among anguished spirits.”
Then the venerable Subhūti asked the Blessed One, “Blessed Lord, in what ways do those deluded persons who reject this profound perfection of wisdom, actually reject it?”
“Subhūti,” replied the Blessed One, “those deluded persons reject the perfection of wisdom in four ways.”
“What are the four ways?”
The Blessed One replied, “Those deluded persons who reject this profound perfection of wisdom are under the influence of Māra, and as a result of that first cause, Subhūti, they reject this profound perfection of wisdom. They have no conviction, faith, or devotion with respect to profound attributes, and as a result of that second cause they reject this profound perfection of wisdom. Subhūti, those deluded persons fall into the clutches of evil associates, {Ki.II-III: 154} lack perseverance, and are fixated on the five aggregates, and as a result of that third cause they reject this profound perfection of wisdom. Subhūti, [F.175.b] those deluded persons conduct themselves in ways imbued with hatred, praising themselves and deprecating others, and as a result of that fourth cause they reject this profound perfection of wisdom. Subhūti, in these four ways deluded persons reject this profound perfection of wisdom.”
“Blessed Lord, it is difficult for those who lack perseverance, who are without the roots of virtuous action, and who are in the clutches of evil associates to have devotion to this profound perfection of wisdom.”
“Subhūti, it is so!” replied the Blessed One. “It is difficult for those who lack perseverance, who are without the roots of virtuous action, and who have fallen into in the clutches of evil associates to have devotion to this profound perfection of wisdom.”
“Blessed Lord, how profound is that perfection of wisdom, for which it is difficult to have devotion in that manner?”
“Subhūti,” replied the Blessed One, “physical forms are neither fettered nor liberated. If you ask why, Subhūti, in physical forms the absence of inherent existence is still physical forms. Feelings, perceptions, formative predispositions, and consciousness are neither fettered nor liberated. If you ask why, Subhūti, in consciousness [and so forth], the absence of inherent existence is still consciousness [and so forth]. Subhūti, the sense fields, the sensory elements, and the links of dependent origination are neither fettered nor liberated. If you ask why, in the links of dependent origination [and so forth], the absence of inherent existence is still the links of dependent origination [and so forth].
“Subhūti, the perfection of generosity is neither fettered nor liberated. If you ask why, Subhūti, in the perfection of generosity the absence of inherent existence is still the perfection of generosity. Subhūti, the perfection of ethical discipline, the perfection of tolerance, the perfection of perseverance, the perfection of meditative concentration, and the perfection of wisdom are neither fettered nor liberated. [F.176.a] If you ask why, Subhūti, in the perfection of wisdom [and so forth], the absence of inherent existence is still the perfection of wisdom [and so forth].
“Subhūti, the emptiness of internal phenomena is neither fettered nor liberated. If you ask why, Subhūti, in the emptiness of internal phenomena the absence of inherent existence is still the emptiness of internal phenomena. Subhūti, the emptiness of external phenomena is neither fettered nor liberated. If you ask why, Subhūti, in the emptiness of external phenomena the absence of inherent existence is still the emptiness of external phenomena. Subhūti, the emptiness of external and internal phenomena is neither fettered nor liberated. If you ask why, Subhūti, in the emptiness of external and internal phenomena the absence of inherent existence is still the emptiness of external and internal phenomena. Subhūti, [the other aspects of emptiness], up to and including the emptiness of the essential nature of nonentities, are neither fettered nor liberated. If you ask why, Subhūti, in the emptiness of the essential nature of nonentities [and so forth], the absence of inherent existence is still the emptiness of the essential nature of nonentities [and so forth].
“Subhūti, the four applications of mindfulness are neither fettered nor liberated. If you ask why, Subhūti, in the four applications of mindfulness the absence of inherent existence is still the four applications of mindfulness. Subhūti, the correct exertions, the supports for miraculous ability, the faculties, the powers, the branches of enlightenment, and the noble eightfold path are neither fettered nor liberated. If you ask why, Subhūti, in the noble eightfold path [and so forth], the absence of inherent existence is still the noble eightfold path [and so forth].
“Subhūti, the truths of the noble ones, the meditative concentrations, the immeasurable attitudes, and the formless absorptions are neither fettered nor liberated. If you ask why, Subhūti, in the formless absorptions [and so forth], the absence of inherent existence is still the formless absorptions [and so forth]. Subhūti, the aspects of liberation, the serial steps of meditative absorption, emptiness, signlessness, [F.176.b] wishlessness, and the extrasensory powers are neither fettered nor liberated. If you ask why, Subhūti, in the extrasensory powers [and so forth], the absence of inherent existence is still the extrasensory powers [and so forth]. Subhūti, the meditative stabilities, the dhāraṇī gateways, the powers of the tathāgatas, the fearlessnesses, the kinds of exact knowledge, and the distinct qualities of the buddhas are neither fettered nor liberated. If you ask why, Subhūti, in the distinct qualities of the buddhas [and so forth], the absence of inherent existence is still the distinct qualities of the buddhas [and so forth]. Subhūti, knowledge of all the dharmas, knowledge of the path, and all-aspect omniscience are neither fettered nor liberated. If you ask why, Subhūti, in all-aspect omniscience [and so forth], the absence of inherent existence is still all-aspect omniscience [and so forth].
“Moreover, Subhūti, the past limits of physical forms are neither fettered nor liberated. If you ask why, Subhūti, the inherent existence of their past limits, though without entity, is still physical forms. Subhūti, the past limits of feelings, perceptions, formative predispositions, and consciousness are neither fettered nor liberated. If you ask why, Subhūti, the inherent existence of their past limits, though without entity, is still consciousness [and so forth]. Subhūti, the past limits [of all other phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are neither fettered nor liberated. If you ask why, Subhūti, the inherent existence of their past limits, though without entity, is still all-aspect omniscience [and so forth].
“Moreover, Subhūti, the future limits of physical forms are neither fettered nor liberated. If you ask why, Subhūti, the inherent existence of their future limits, though without entity, is still physical forms. Subhūti, the future limits of feelings, perceptions, formative predispositions, and consciousness are neither fettered nor liberated. If you ask why, Subhūti, the inherent existence of their future limits, though without entity, is still consciousness [and so forth]. {Ki.II-III: 155} Subhūti, the future limits [of all other phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are neither fettered nor liberated. [F.177.a] If you ask why, Subhūti, the inherent existence of their future limits, though without entity, is still all-aspect omniscience [and so forth].
“Moreover, Subhūti, the present state of physical forms is neither fettered nor liberated. If you ask why, Subhūti, the inherent existence of their present state, though without entity, is still physical forms. Subhūti, the present states of feelings, perceptions, formative predispositions, and consciousness are neither fettered nor liberated. If you ask why, Subhūti, the inherent existence of their present states, though without entity, is still consciousness [and so forth]. Subhūti, the present states [of all other phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are neither fettered nor liberated. If you ask why, Subhūti, the inherent existence of their present states, though without entity, is still all-aspect omniscience [and so forth].”
“Blessed Lord, it is difficult for those who do not persevere, who have not cultivated the roots of virtuous action, who have fallen into the clutches of evil associates, who are under the sway of māras, who are indolent, feeble in perseverance, and forgetful, and who are without alertness to believe in the perfection of wisdom.”
“Subhūti, so it is!” replied the Blessed One. “Subhūti, it is difficult for those who do not persevere, who have not cultivated the roots of virtuous action, who have fallen into the clutches of evil associates, who are under the sway of māras, who are indolent, feeble in perseverance, and forgetful, and who are without alertness to believe in the perfection of wisdom.
“Moreover, Subhūti, the purity of physical forms is the purity of fruition. The purity of feelings, perceptions, formative predispositions, and consciousness is the purity of fruition. The purity of the sense fields, sensory elements, and links of dependent origination is the purity of fruition. The purity of the perfection of generosity is the purity of fruition. [F.177.b] The purity of the perfection of ethical discipline, the perfection of tolerance, the perfection of perseverance, the perfection of meditative concentration, and the perfection of wisdom is the purity of fruition. The purity of the emptiness of internal phenomena is the purity of fruition. The purity of [the other aspects of emptiness], up to and including the emptiness of the essential nature of nonentities, is the purity of fruition. The purity of the thirty-seven factors conducive to enlightenment is the purity of fruition. The purity of the truths of the noble ones, the meditative concentrations, the immeasurable attitudes, and the formless absorptions is the purity of fruition. The purity of the eight aspects of liberation, the nine serial steps of meditative absorption, emptiness, signlessness, wishlessness, and the extrasensory powers is the purity of fruition. The purity of the meditative stabilities and the dhāraṇī gateways is the purity of fruition. The purity of the ten powers of the tathāgatas, the four fearlessnesses, the four kinds of exact knowledge, and the eighteen distinct qualities of the buddhas is the purity of fruition. The purity of knowledge of all the dharmas, knowledge of the path, and all-aspect omniscience is the purity of fruition.
“Moreover, Subhūti, the purity of physical forms is the purity of the perfection of wisdom. The purity of the perfection of wisdom is the purity of physical forms. {Ki.II-III: 156} So it is that the purity of physical forms and this purity of the perfection of wisdom are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished. [F.178.a] The purity of feelings, perceptions, formative predispositions, and consciousness is the purity of the perfection of wisdom. The purity of the perfection of wisdom is the purity of consciousness [and so forth]. So it is that the purity of consciousness [and so forth] and this purity of the perfection of wisdom are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished. The purity of [all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, is the purity of the perfection of wisdom. The purity of the perfection of wisdom is the purity of all-aspect omniscience [and so forth]. So it is that the purity of all-aspect omniscience [and so forth] and this purity of the perfection of wisdom are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Moreover, Subhūti, the purity of the self is the purity of physical forms. The purity of physical forms is the purity of the self. So it is that the purity of the self and this purity of physical forms are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished. The purity of the self is the purity of feelings, perceptions, formative predispositions, and consciousness. The purity of consciousness [and so forth] is the purity of the self. So it is that the purity of the self and this purity of consciousness [and so forth] are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished. The purity of the self is the purity of [all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience. The purity of all-aspect omniscience [and so forth] is the purity of the self. So it is that the purity of the self and this purity of all-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished. [F.178.b]
“The purity of sentient beings, life forms, life, living creatures, individuals, human beings, people, actors, experiencers, knowers, and viewers is the purity of physical forms. The purity of physical forms is the purity of viewers [and so forth]. So it is that the purity of viewers [and so forth] and this purity of physical forms are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished. The purity of beings [and so forth], up to and including viewers, is the purity of feelings, perceptions, formative predispositions and consciousness. The purity of consciousness [and so forth] is the purity of viewers [and so forth]. So it is that the purity of viewers [and so forth] and this purity of consciousness [and so forth] are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished. The purity of beings [and so forth], up to and including viewers, is the purity of [all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience. The purity of all-aspect omniscience [and so forth] is the purity of viewers [and so forth]. So it is that the purity of viewers [and so forth] and this purity of all-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Moreover, Subhūti, physical forms are pure owing to the purity of the self, and the self is pure owing to the purity of physical forms. So it is that the purity of the self and this purity of physical forms are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished. Feelings, perceptions, formative predispositions, and consciousness are pure owing to the purity of the self, and the self is pure owing to the purity of consciousness [and so forth]. So it is that the purity of the self and this purity of consciousness [and so forth] are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished. [F.179.a] [All phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are pure owing to the purity of the self, and the self is pure owing to the purity of all-aspect omniscience [and so forth]. So it is that the purity of the self and this purity of all-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Physical forms are pure owing to the purity of beings [and so forth], up to and including viewers; viewers [and so forth] are pure owing to the purity of physical forms. So it is that the purity of viewers [and so forth] and this purity of physical forms are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished. [All phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are pure owing to the purity of beings [and so forth], up to and including viewers; viewers [and so forth] are pure owing to the purity of all-aspect omniscience [and so forth]. So it is that the purity of viewers [and so forth] and this purity of all-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Moreover, Subhūti, physical forms are pure owing to the purity of desire, and desire is pure owing to the purity of physical forms. So it is that the purity of desire and this purity of physical forms are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished. [All phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are pure owing to the purity of desire, and desire is pure owing to the purity of all-aspect omniscience [and so forth]. So it is that the purity of desire and this purity of all-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Physical forms are pure owing to the purity of hatred, and hatred is pure owing to the purity of physical forms. So it is that the purity of hatred and this purity of physical forms are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished. [F.179.b] [All phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are pure owing to the purity of hatred, and hatred is pure owing to the purity of all-aspect omniscience [and so forth]. So it is that the purity of hatred and this purity of all-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Physical forms are pure owing to the purity of delusion, and delusion is pure owing to the purity of physical forms. So it is that the purity of delusion and this purity of physical forms are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished. [All phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are pure owing to the purity of delusion, and delusion is pure owing to the purity of all-aspect omniscience [and so forth]. So it is that the purity of delusion and this purity of all-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Moreover, Subhūti, physical forms are utterly pure owing to the utter purity of desire, and desire is utterly pure owing to the utter purity of physical forms. So it is that the utter purity of desire and this utter purity of physical forms are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished. [All phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are utterly pure owing to the utter purity of desire, and desire is pure owing to the utter purity of all-aspect omniscience [and so forth]. So it is that the utter purity of desire and this utter purity of all-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Physical forms are utterly pure owing to the utter purity of hatred, and hatred is utterly pure owing to the utter purity of physical forms. So it is that the utter purity of hatred and this utter purity of physical forms are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished. [F.180.a] [All phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are utterly pure owing to the utter purity of hatred, and hatred is utterly pure owing to the utter purity of all-aspect omniscience [and so forth]. So it is that the utter purity of hatred and this utter purity of all-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Physical forms are utterly pure owing to the utter purity of delusion, and delusion is utterly pure owing to the utter purity of physical forms. So it is that the utter purity of delusion and this utter purity of physical forms are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished. [All phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are utterly pure owing to the utter purity of delusion, and delusion is utterly pure owing to the utter purity of all-aspect omniscience [and so forth]. So it is that the utter purity of delusion and this utter purity of all-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished. {Ki.II-III: 157}
“Moreover, Subhūti, formative predispositions are pure owing to the purity of ignorance, and ignorance is pure owing to the purity of formative predispositions. So it is that the purity of ignorance and this purity of formative predispositions are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished. Consciousness is pure owing to the purity of formative predispositions. Name and form are pure owing to the purity of consciousness. The six sense fields are pure owing to the purity of name and form. Sensory contact is pure owing to the purity of the six sense fields. Sensation is pure owing to the purity of sensory contact. Craving is pure owing to the purity of sensation. Grasping is pure owing to the purity of craving. The rebirth process is pure owing to the purity of grasping. Actual birth is pure owing to the purity of the rebirth process. Aging and death are pure owing to the purity of actual birth. [And in reverse], actual birth is pure owing to the purity of aging and death [and so forth]. [F.180.b] So it is that the purity of actual birth [and so forth] and this purity of aging and death [and so forth] are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“The perfection of wisdom is pure owing to the purity of aging and death. Aging and death are pure owing to the purity of the perfection of wisdom. So it is that the purity of aging and death and this purity of the perfection of wisdom are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished. The perfection of meditative concentration is pure owing to the purity of the perfection of wisdom. The perfection of perseverance is pure owing to the purity of the perfection of meditative concentration. The perfection of tolerance is pure owing to the purity of the perfection of perseverance. The perfection of ethical discipline is pure owing to the purity of the perfection of tolerance. The perfection of generosity is pure owing to the purity of the perfection of ethical discipline. [And in reverse], the perfection of ethical discipline is pure owing to the purity of the perfection of generosity [and so forth]. So it is that the purity of the perfection of generosity [and so forth] and this purity of the perfection of ethical discipline [and so forth] are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“The emptiness of internal phenomena is pure owing to the purity of the perfection of generosity, and the perfection of generosity is pure owing to the purity of the emptiness of internal phenomena. So it is that the purity of the perfection of generosity [and so forth] and this purity of the emptiness of internal phenomena are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished. The emptiness of external phenomena is pure owing to the purity of the emptiness of internal phenomena. The emptiness of external and internal phenomena is pure owing to the purity of the emptiness of external phenomena. [The other aspects of emptiness], up to and including the emptiness of the essential nature of nonentities, are pure owing to the purity of the emptiness of external and internal phenomena [and so forth]. [F.181.a] [And in reverse], the emptiness of the essential nature is pure owing to the purity of the emptiness of the essential nature of nonentities. So it is that the purity of the emptiness of the essential nature and this purity of the emptiness of the essential nature of nonentities are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“The applications of mindfulness are pure owing to the purity of the emptiness of the essential nature of nonentities. The emptiness of the essential nature of nonentities is pure owing to the purity of the applications of mindfulness. So it is that the purity of the emptiness of the essential nature of nonentities and this purity of the applications of mindfulness are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“The correct exertions are pure owing to the purity of the applications of mindfulness. The supports for miraculous ability are pure owing to the purity of the correct exertions. The faculties are pure owing to the purity of the supports for miraculous ability. The powers are pure owing to the purity of the faculties. The branches of enlightenment are pure owing to the purity of the powers. The path is pure owing to the purity of the branches of enlightenment. [And in reverse], the branches of enlightenment are pure owing to the purity of the path. So it is that the purity of the branches of enlightenment and this purity of the path are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“The truths of the noble ones are pure owing to the purity of the path. The meditative concentrations are pure owing to the purity of the truths of the noble ones. The immeasurable attitudes are pure owing to the purity of the meditative concentrations. The formless absorptions are pure owing to the purity of the immeasurable attitudes. The eight aspects of liberation are pure owing to the purity of the formless absorptions. [F.181.b] The nine serial steps of meditative absorption are pure owing to the purity of the eight aspects of liberation. Emptiness, signlessness, and wishlessness are pure owing to the purity of the serial steps of meditative absorption. The extrasensory powers are pure owing to the purity of emptiness, signlessness, and wishlessness. The meditative stabilities are pure owing to the purity of the extrasensory powers. The dhāraṇī gateways are pure owing to the purity of the meditative stabilities. The powers of the tathāgatas are pure owing to the purity of the dhāraṇī gateways. The fearlessnesses are pure owing to the purity of the powers of the tathāgatas. The kinds of exact knowledge are pure owing to the purity of the fearlessnesses. The distinct qualities of the buddhas are pure owing to the purity of the kinds of exact knowledge. Knowledge of all the dharmas is pure owing to the purity of the distinct qualities of the buddhas. {Ki.II-III: 158} Knowledge of the path is pure owing to the purity of knowledge of all the dharmas. All-aspect omniscience is pure owing to the purity of knowledge of the path. [And in reverse], knowledge of the path is pure owing to the purity of all-aspect omniscience. So it is that the purity of knowledge of the path and this purity of all-aspect omniscience are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Moreover, Subhūti, physical forms are pure owing to the purity of the perfection of wisdom. [All phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are pure owing to the purity of physical forms. So it is that the purity of the perfection of wisdom, the purity of physical forms, and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished. [F.182.a]
“Feelings, perceptions, formative predispositions, and consciousness are pure owing to the purity of the perfection of wisdom. [All phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are pure owing to the purity of consciousness [and so forth]. So it is that the purity of the perfection of wisdom, the purity of consciousness [and so forth], and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“The eyes are pure owing to the purity of the perfection of wisdom. [All phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are pure owing to the purity of the eyes. So it is that the purity of the perfection of wisdom, the purity of the eyes, and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“The ears, nose, tongue, body, and mental faculty are pure owing to the purity of the perfection of wisdom. [All phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are pure owing to the purity of the mental faculty [and so forth]. So it is that the purity of the perfection of wisdom, the purity of the mental faculty [and so forth], and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Sights are pure owing to the purity of the perfection of wisdom. [All phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are pure owing to the purity of sights. So it is that the purity of the perfection of wisdom, the purity of sights, and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Sounds, odors, tastes, tangibles, and mental phenomena are pure owing to the purity of the perfection of wisdom. [All phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are pure owing to the purity of mental phenomena [and so forth]. So it is that the purity of the perfection of wisdom, the purity of mental phenomena [F.182.b] [and so forth], and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Visual consciousness is pure owing to the purity of the perfection of wisdom. [All phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are pure owing to the purity of visual consciousness. So it is that the purity of the perfection of wisdom, the purity of visual consciousness, and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Auditory consciousness, olfactory consciousness, gustatory consciousness, tactile consciousness, and mental consciousness are pure owing to the purity of the perfection of wisdom. [All phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are pure owing to the purity of mental consciousness [and so forth]. So it is that the purity of the perfection of wisdom, the purity of mental consciousness [and so forth], and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Visually compounded sensory contact is pure owing to the purity of the perfection of wisdom. [All phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are pure owing to the purity of visually compounded sensory contact. So it is that the purity of the perfection of wisdom, the purity of visually compounded sensory contact, and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Aurally compounded sensory contact, nasally compounded sensory contact, lingually compounded sensory contact, corporeally compounded sensory contact, and mentally compounded sensory contact are pure owing to the purity of the perfection of wisdom. [All phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are pure owing to the purity of mentally compounded sensory contact [and so forth]. [F.183.a] So it is that the purity of the perfection of wisdom, the purity of mentally compounded sensory contact [and so forth], and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Feelings conditioned by visually compounded sensory contact are pure owing to the purity of the perfection of wisdom. [All phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are pure owing to the purity of feelings conditioned by visually compounded sensory contact. So it is that the purity of the perfection of wisdom, the purity of feelings conditioned by visually compounded sensory contact, and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Feelings conditioned by aurally compounded sensory contact, feelings conditioned by nasally compounded sensory contact, feelings conditioned by lingually compounded sensory contact, feelings conditioned by corporeally compounded sensory contact, and feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact are pure owing to the purity of the perfection of wisdom. [All phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are pure owing to the purity of feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact [and so forth]. So it is that the purity of the perfection of wisdom, the purity of feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact [and so forth], and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Physical forms are pure owing to the purity of the perfection of meditative concentration, the perfection of perseverance, the perfection of tolerance, the perfection of ethical discipline, and the perfection of generosity. All-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are pure owing to the purity of physical forms. So it is that the purity of the perfection of generosity [and so forth], the purity of physical forms, [F.183.b] and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Feelings, perceptions, formative predispositions, and consciousness are pure owing to the purity of the perfection of generosity [and so forth]. All-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are pure owing to the purity of consciousness [and so forth]. So it is that the purity of the perfection of generosity [and so forth], the purity of consciousness [and so forth], and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“The eyes are pure owing to the purity of the perfection of generosity [and so forth]. All-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are pure owing to the purity of the eyes. So it is that the purity of the perfection of generosity [and so forth], the purity of the eyes, and this purity of [all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“The ears, nose, tongue, body, and mental faculty are pure owing to the purity of the perfection of generosity [and so forth]. All-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are pure owing to the purity of the mental faculty [and so forth]. So it is that the purity of the perfection of generosity [and so forth], the purity of the mental faculty [and so forth], and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Sights are pure owing to the purity of the perfection of generosity [and so forth]. All-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are pure owing to the purity of sights. So it is that the purity of the perfection of generosity [and so forth], the purity of sights, and this purity of [all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Sounds, odors, tastes, tangibles, and mental phenomena are pure owing to the purity of the perfection of generosity [and so forth]. All-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are pure owing to the purity of mental phenomena [and so forth]. [F.184.a] So it is that the purity of the perfection of generosity [and so forth], the purity of mental phenomena [and so forth], and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Visual consciousness is pure owing to the purity of the perfection of generosity [and so forth]. All-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are pure owing to the purity of visual consciousness. So it is that the purity of the perfection of generosity [and so forth], the purity of visual consciousness, and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Auditory consciousness, olfactory consciousness, gustatory consciousness, tactile consciousness, and mental consciousness are pure owing to the purity of the perfection of generosity [and so forth]. All-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are pure owing to the purity of mental consciousness [and so forth]. So it is that the purity of the perfection of generosity [and so forth], the purity of mental consciousness [and so forth], and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Visually compounded sensory contact is pure owing to the purity of the perfection of generosity [and so forth]. All-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are pure owing to the purity of visually compounded sensory contact. So it is that the purity of the perfection of generosity [and so forth], the purity of visually compounded sensory contact, and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Aurally compounded sensory contact, nasally compounded sensory contact, lingually compounded sensory contact, corporeally compounded sensory contact, and [F.184.b] mentally compounded sensory contact are pure owing to the purity of the perfection of generosity [and so forth]. All-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are pure owing to the purity of mentally compounded sensory contact [and so forth]. So it is that the purity of the perfection of generosity [and so forth], the purity of mentally compounded sensory contact [and so forth], and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Feelings conditioned by visually compounded sensory contact are pure owing to the purity of the perfection of generosity [and so forth]. All-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are pure owing to the purity of feelings conditioned by visually compounded sensory contact. So it is that the purity of the perfection of generosity [and so forth], the purity of feelings conditioned by visually compounded sensory contact, and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Feelings conditioned by aurally compounded sensory contact, feelings conditioned by nasally compounded sensory contact, feelings conditioned by lingually compounded sensory contact, feelings conditioned by corporeally compounded sensory contact, and feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact are pure owing to the purity of the perfection of generosity [and so forth]. All-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are pure owing to the purity of feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact [and so forth]. So it is that the purity of the perfection of generosity [and so forth], the purity of feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact [and so forth], and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Physical forms are pure owing to the purity of the emptiness of internal phenomena. All-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are pure owing to the purity of physical forms. So it is that the purity of the emptiness of internal phenomena, the purity of physical forms, and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, [F.185.a] and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished. [All phenomena], up to and including feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact, are pure owing to the purity of the emptiness of internal phenomena. All-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are pure owing to the purity of feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact [and so forth]. So it is that the purity of the emptiness of internal phenomena, the purity of feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact [and so forth], and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Physical forms are pure owing to the purity of [the other aspects of emptiness], up to and including the emptiness of the essential nature of nonentities. All-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are pure owing to the purity of physical forms. So it is that the purity of the emptiness of the essential nature of nonentities [and so forth], the purity of physical forms, and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished. [All phenomena], up to and including feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact, are pure owing to the purity of [the other aspects of emptiness], up to and including the emptiness of the essential nature of nonentities. All-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are pure owing to the purity of feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact [and so forth]. So it is that the purity of the emptiness of the essential nature of nonentities [and so forth], the purity of feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact [and so forth], and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Physical forms are pure owing to the purity of the applications of mindfulness. All-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are pure owing to the purity of physical forms. So it is that the purity of the applications of mindfulness, the purity of physical forms, and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished. [All phenomena], up to and including feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact, are pure owing to the purity of the applications of mindfulness. [F.185.b] All-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are pure owing to the purity of feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact [and so forth]. So it is that the purity of the applications of mindfulness, the purity of feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact [and so forth], and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Physical forms are pure owing to the purity of [the other causal attributes], up to and including the noble eightfold path. All-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are pure owing to the purity of physical forms. So it is that the purity of the noble eightfold path [and so forth], the purity of physical forms, and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished. [All phenomena], up to and including feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact, are pure owing to the purity of [the other causal attributes], up to and including the noble eightfold path. All-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are pure owing to the purity of feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact [and so forth]. So it is that the purity of the noble eightfold path [and so forth], the purity of feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact [and so forth], and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Physical forms are pure owing to the purity of the truths of the noble ones, the meditative concentrations, the immeasurable attitudes, the formless absorptions, the aspects of liberation, the serial steps of meditative absorption, emptiness, signlessness, wishlessness, the extrasensory powers, the meditative stabilities, the dhāraṇī gateways, the powers of the tathāgatas, the fearlessnesses, the kinds of exact knowledge, great loving kindness, great compassion, [F.186.a] and the distinct qualities of the buddhas. All-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are pure owing to the purity of physical forms. So it is that the purity of the distinct qualities of the buddhas [and so forth], the purity of physical forms, and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished. [All phenomena], up to and including feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact, are pure owing to the purity of the truths of the noble ones, the meditative concentrations, the immeasurable attitudes, the formless absorptions, the aspects of liberation, the serial steps of meditative absorption, emptiness, signlessness, wishlessness, the extrasensory powers, the meditative stabilities, the dhāraṇī gateways, the powers of the tathāgatas, the fearlessnesses, the kinds of exact knowledge, great loving kindness, great compassion, and the distinct qualities of the buddhas. All-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are pure owing to the purity of feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact [and so forth]. So it is that the purity of the distinct qualities of the buddhas [and so forth], the purity of feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact [and so forth], and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Physical forms are pure owing to the purity of the fruit of entering the stream to nirvāṇa. All-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are pure owing to the purity of physical forms. So it is that the purity of the fruit of entering the stream to nirvāṇa, the purity of physical forms, and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished. [B39]
“[All phenomena], up to and including feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact, are pure owing to the purity of the fruit of entering the stream to nirvāṇa. [F.186.b] All-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are pure owing to the purity of feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact [and so forth]. So it is that the purity of the fruit of entering the stream to nirvāṇa, the purity of feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact [and so forth], and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Physical forms are pure owing to the purity of the fruit of being destined for only one more rebirth, the fruit of no longer being subject to rebirth, arhatship, and individual enlightenment. All-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are pure owing to the purity of physical forms. So it is that the purity of individual enlightenment [and so forth], the purity of physical forms, and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished. [All phenomena], up to and including feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact, are pure owing to the purity of the fruit of being destined for only one more rebirth, the fruit of no longer being subject to rebirth, arhatship, and individual enlightenment. All-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are pure owing to the purity of feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact [and so forth]. So it is that the purity of individual enlightenment [and so forth], the purity of feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact [and so forth], and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Physical forms are pure owing to the purity of knowledge of the path. All-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are pure owing to the purity of physical forms. So it is that the purity of knowledge of the path, the purity of physical forms, and this purity of [all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished. [F.187.a] [All phenomena], up to and including feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact, are pure owing to the purity of knowledge of the path. All-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are pure owing to the purity of feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact [and so forth]. So it is that the purity of knowledge of the path, the purity of feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact [and so forth], and this purity [of all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Physical forms are pure owing to the purity of all-aspect omniscience. All-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are pure owing to the purity of physical forms. So it is that the purity of all-aspect omniscience, the purity of physical forms, and this purity of [all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished. [All phenomena], up to and including feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact, are pure owing to the purity of all-aspect omniscience. All-aspect omniscience [and so forth] are pure owing to the purity of feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact [and so forth]. So it is that the purity of all-aspect omniscience, the purity of feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact [and so forth], and this purity of [all phenomena, attributes, and attainments], up to and including all-aspect omniscience, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Moreover, Subhūti, physical forms are pure owing to the purity of all-aspect omniscience. The perfection of wisdom is pure owing to the purity of physical forms. So it is that the purity of all-aspect omniscience, the purity of physical forms, and this purity of the perfection of wisdom are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished. [F.187.b] Feelings, perceptions, formative predispositions, and consciousness are pure owing to the purity of all-aspect omniscience. The perfection of wisdom is pure owing to the purity of consciousness [and so forth]. So it is that the purity of all-aspect omniscience, the purity of consciousness [and so forth], and this purity of the perfection of wisdom are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“[All phenomena], up to and including feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact, are pure owing to the purity of all-aspect omniscience. The perfection of wisdom is pure owing to the purity of feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact [and so forth]. So it is that the purity of all-aspect omniscience, the purity of feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact [and so forth], and this purity of the perfection of wisdom are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Physical forms are pure owing to the purity of all-aspect omniscience. The perfection of meditative concentration, the perfection of perseverance, the perfection of tolerance, the perfection of ethical discipline, and the perfection of generosity are pure owing to the purity of physical forms. So it is that the purity of all-aspect omniscience, the purity of physical forms, and this purity of the perfection of generosity [and so forth] are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“[All phenomena], up to and including feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact, are pure owing to the purity of all-aspect omniscience. The perfection of meditative concentration, the perfection of perseverance, the perfection of tolerance, the perfection of ethical discipline, and the perfection of generosity are pure owing to the purity of feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact [and so forth]. [F.188.a] So it is that the purity of all-aspect omniscience, the purity of feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact [and so forth], and this purity of the perfection of generosity [and so forth] are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“Moreover, Subhūti, unconditioned phenomena are pure owing to the purity of conditioned phenomena. [Conditioned phenomena are pure owing to the purity of unconditioned phenomena].401 So it is that the purity of conditioned phenomena and this purity of unconditioned phenomena are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished. {Ki.II-III: 159}
“Moreover, Subhūti, the future and the present are pure owing to the purity of the past. So it is that the purity of the past, the purity of the future, and the purity of the present are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“The past and the present are pure owing to the purity of the future. So it is that the purity of the future, and the purity of the past and the present, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
“The past and the future are pure owing to the purity of the present. So it is that the purity of the present, and the purity of the past and the future, are not two things, they cannot be divided into two, and they cannot be differentiated or distinguished.
This completes the twenty-sixth chapter, “The Hells,” from “The Perfection of Wisdom in Twenty-Five Thousand Lines.”
Colophon
It is said in the original Jangpa manuscript:
This [Tibetan translation of] The Perfection of Wisdom in Twenty-Five Thousand Lines has been edited twice on the basis of the original “gold manuscript,” which had been [commissioned as] a commitment of the spiritual mentor Nyanggom Chobar, and it has also been edited on the basis of the manuscript kept at Yerpa. Since it is extant, scribes of posterity should copy [the text] according to this version alone.
In the [recast] version of The Perfection of Wisdom in Twenty-Five Thousand Lines [Toh 3790] that was edited by master Haribhadra, and in some [other] manuscripts, the text ends with the seventy-first chapter entitled “Unchanging Reality.” In certain [other] manuscripts, including the original (phyi mo) [Toh 9], there are seventy-six chapters, with [F.380.b] the addition of the [seventy-second] chapter entitled “Distinctions in the Training of a Bodhisattva,” the [seventy-third] chapter entitled “The Attainment of the Manifold Gateways of Meditative Stability by the Bodhisattva Sadāprarudita,” the [seventy-fourth] chapter entitled “Sadāprarudita,” the [seventy-fifth] chapter entitled “Dharmodgata,” and the [seventy-sixth] chapter entitled “Entrustment.” This accords with earlier accounts and the authentic records of teachings received. Insofar as there are distinctions in the translation of these five later chapters, I have seen a few manuscripts where the terminology is slightly dissimilar, although there are no differences in meaning.
In general, throughout the present text there are all sorts of unique allusions and variations in the elaboration of the points that are expressed. In particular, in the chapter entitled “The Introductory Narrative,” there are some passages where the text corresponds to The Perfection of Wisdom in One Hundred Thousand Lines.
At the time when the carving of the xylographs of this very text, along with those of the Multitude of the Buddhas (Buddhāvataṃsaka), was completed, in the presence of King Tenpa Tsering, the ruler of Degé, the beggar monk Tashi Wangchuk composed these verses at Sharkha Dzongsar Palace, where the wood-carving workshop was based. May they be victorious!
ye dharmā hetuprabhavā hetun teṣāṃ tathāgato bhavat āha teṣāṃ ca yo nirodho evaṃ vādī mahāśramaṇaḥ [ye svāhā]
“Whatever events arise from causes, the Tathāgata has told of their causes, and the great ascetic has also taught their cessation.”
Bibliography
Primary Sources in Tibetan and Sanskrit
shes rab kyi pha rol tu phyin pa stong phrag nyi shu lnga pa (Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikāprajñāpāramitā) [The Perfection of Wisdom in Twenty-Five Thousand Lines]. Toh 9, Degé Kangyur vols. 26–28 (shes phyin, nyi khri, ka–a), folios ka.1.b–ga.381.a.
shes rab kyi pha rol tu phyin pa stong phrag nyi shu lnga pa (Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikāprajñāpāramitā) [The Perfection of Wisdom in Twenty-Five Thousand Lines, Toh 9]. bka’ ’gyur (dpe bsdur ma) [Comparative Edition of the Kangyur], krung go’i bod rig pa zhib ’jug ste gnas kyi bka’ bstan dpe sdur khang (The Tibetan Tripitaka Collation Bureau of the China Tibetology Research Center). 108 volumes. Beijing: krung go’i bod rig pa dpe skrun khang (China Tibetology Publishing House), 2006–2009, vols. 26–28.
Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā prajñāpāramitā [The Perfection of Wisdom in Twenty-Five Thousand Lines]. Sanskrit text based on the edition by Takayasu Kimura. Tokyo: Sankibo Busshorin 2007–9 (1–1, 1–2), 1986 (2–3), 1990 (4), 1992 (5), 2006 (6–8). Available as e-text on Göttingen Register of Electronic Texts in Indian Languages (GRETIL). Page references: {Ki.}
Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā prajñāpāramitā [The Perfection of Wisdom in Twenty-Five Thousand Lines]. Dutt, Nalinaksha. Calcutta Oriental Series 28. London: Luzac, 1934. Reprint edition, Sri Satguru Publications, 1986. Available as e-text on Göttingen Register of Electronic Texts in Indian Languages (GRETIL). Page references: {Dt.nn}
Aṣṭasāhasrikā prajñāpāramitā [The Perfection of Wisdom in Eight Thousand Lines]. Sanskrit text based on the edition by P. L. Vaidya, in Buddhist Sanskrit Texts, vol. 4. Darbhanga: The Mithila Institute, 1960. Available as e-text on Göttingen Register of Electronic Texts in Indian Languages (GRETIL). Page references (for chapters 73–75): {Va.nn}
Secondary References in Tibetan and Sanskrit
shes rab kyi pha rol tu phyin pa stong phrag nyi shu lnga pa (Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikāprajñāpāramitā) [The Perfection of Wisdom in Twenty-Five Thousand Lines, the “eight-chapter” (le’u brgyad ma) Tengyur version]. Toh 3790, Degé Tengyur vols. 82–84 (shes phyin, ga–ca), folios ga.1.b–ca.342.a.
shes rab kyi pha rol tu phyin pa stong phrag brgya pa (Śatasāhasrikāprajñāpāramitā) [The Perfection of Wisdom in One Hundred Thousand Lines]. Toh 8, Degé Kangyur vols. 14–25 (shes phyin, ’bum, ka–a).
Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā prajñāpāramitā [The Perfection of Wisdom in Twenty-Five Thousand Lines]. Sanskrit text of the Anurādhapura fragment, based on the edition by Oskar von Hinüber, “Sieben Goldblätter einer Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā aus Anurādhapura,” in Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen, Phil.-Hist.Kl. 1983, pp. 189–207. Available as e-text on Göttingen Register of Electronic Texts in Indian Languages (GRETIL).
Śatasāhasrikā prajñāpāramitā [The Perfection of Wisdom in One Hundred Thousand Lines]. Sanskrit texts based on Ghoṣa, Pratāpacandra, Çatasāhasrikā prajñāpāramitā: A Theological and Philosophical Discourse of Buddha With His Disciples in A Hundred Thousand Stanzas. Calcutta: Asiatic Society of Bengal, 1902–14 (chapters 1–12); and on Kimura, Takayasu, Śatasāhasrikā prajñāpāramitā, II/1–4, 4 vols. Tokyo: Sankibo Busshorin, 2009–14. Available as e-texts, Part I and Part II, on Göttingen Register of Electronic Texts in Indian Languages (GRETIL).
The Larger Prajñāpāramitā. Sanskrit edition (mostly according to the Gilgit manuscript GBM 175–675, fols. 1–27) from Zacchetti, Stefano (2005). In Praise of the Light: A Critical Synoptic Edition with an Annotated Translation of Chapters 1-3 of Dharmarakṣa’s Guang zan jing, Being the Earliest Chinese Translation of the Larger Prajñāpāramitā. Bibliotheca Philologica et Philosophica Buddhica, Vol. 8. The International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology. Tokyo: Soka University, 2005. Available as e-text on Göttingen Register of Electronic Texts in Indian Languages (GRETIL).
The Larger Prajñāpāramitā. Sanskrit edition (Gilgit manuscript fols. 202.a.5-205.a.12, GBM 571.5–577.12) from Yoke Meei Choong, Zum Problem der Leerheit (śūnyatā) in der Prajñāpāramitā, Frankfurt: Europäische Hochschulschriften, Reihe 27, Bd. 97, 2006, pp. 109–33. Available as e-text on Göttingen Register of Electronic Texts in Indian Languages (GRETIL).
Daṃṣṭrasena. shes rab kyi pha rol tu phyin pa ’bum pa rgya cher ’grel pa (Śatasāhasrikāprajñāpāramitābṛhaṭṭīkā) [“An Extensive Commentary on The Perfection of Wisdom in One Hundred Thousand Lines”], Toh 3807, Degé Tengyur vols. 91–92. Also in Tengyur Pedurma (TPD) (bstan ’gyur [dpe bsdur ma]), [Comparative Edition of the Tengyur], krung go’i bod rig pa zhib ’jug ste gnas kyi bka’ bstan dpe sdur khang (The Tibetan Tripitaka Collation Bureau of the China Tibetology Research Center). 120 volumes. Beijing: krung go’i bod rig pa dpe skrun khang (China Tibetology Publishing House), 1994–2008, vol. 54 (TPD 54) pp. 627–1439 and vol. 55 pp. 2–550.
Denkarma (ldan dkar ma; pho brang stod thang ldan dkar gyi chos ’gyur ro cog gi dkar chag). Toh 4364, Degé Tengyur vol. 206 (sna tshogs, jo), folios 294.b–310.a.
Phangthangma (dkar chag ’phang thang ma). Beijing: mi rigs dpe skrun khang, 2003.
Butön (bu ston rin chen grub). bde bar gshegs pa’i bstan pa’i gsal byed chos kyi ’byung gnas gsung rab rin po che’i mdzod. In gsung ’bum/_rin chen grub/ zhol par ma/ ldi lir bskyar par brgyab pa/ [The Collected Works of Bu-ston: Edited by Lokesh Chandra from the Collections of Raghu Vira], vol. 24, pp. 633–1056. New Delhi: International Academy of Indian Culture, 1965–71.
Jamgön Kongtrül (’jam mgon kong sprul). shes bya kun khyab mdzod [“The Treasury of Knowledge”]. Root verses contained in three-volume publication. Beijing: Mi rigs dpe skrun khang, 1982; Boudhnath: Padma Karpo Translation Committee edition, 2000 (photographic reproduction of the original four-volume Palpung xylograph, 1844). Translated, along with the auto-commentary, by the Kalu Rinpoche Translation Group in The Treasury of Knowledge series (TOK). Ithaca, NY: Snow Lion Publications, 1995 to 2012. Mentioned here are Ngawang Zangpo 2010 (Books 2, 3, and 4) and Dorje 2012 (Book 6, Parts 1–2).
Nordrang Orgyan (nor brang o rgyan). chos rnam kun btus. 3 vols. Beijing: Krung go’i bod rig pa dpe skrun khang, 2008.
Tsongkhapa (tsong kha pa blo bzang grags pa). byang chub sems dpa’ sems dpa’ chen po rtagtu ngu’i rtogs pa brjod pa’i snyan dngags dpag bsam gyi ljong pa [“An Avadāna of the Bodhisattva-Mahāsattva Sadāprarudita”], in Lhasa (zhol) Kangyur vol. 34, folios 523.b–555.b (pp. 1046–1110). The same text is also to be found in Tsongkhapa’s Collected Works: gsung ’bum tsong kha pa (bkras lhun par rnying ldi lir bskyar par brgyab pa), vol. 3, Ngawang Gelek Demo, 1975, pp. 242–96.
Zhang Yisun et al. bod rgya tshig mdzod chen mo. 3 vols. Subsequently reprinted in 2 vols. and 1 vol. Beijing: Mi rigs dpe skrun khang, 1985. Translated in Nyima and Dorje 2001 (vol. 1).
Secondary References in English and Other Languages
Bhattacharya, B. [Illustrations of the Indikutasaya Copper Plaques], in Bulletin of the Baroda State Museum and Picture Gallery, I 1. Baroda: 1943-4.
Bodhi, Bhikkhu, trans. The Sūtra on the All-Embracing Net of Views. Kandy: Buddhist Publication Society, 1978.
Bongard-Levin, G.M., and Shin’ichirō Hori. “A Fragment of the Larger Prajñāpāramitā from Central Asia.” Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 19, no. 1 (1996): 19-60.
Boucher, Daniel. “Dharmarakṣa and the Transmission of Buddhism to China.” Asia Major (Academia Sinica) no. 1/2, (2006): 13–37. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41649912.
Burchardi, Anne, trans. The Teaching on the Great Compassion of the Tathāgata (Tathāgatamahākaruṇānirdeśa, Toh 147). 84000: Translating the Words of the Buddha, 2020.
Brunnhölzl, Karl. Gone Beyond: The Prajñāpāramitā Sūtras, The Ornament of Clear Realization, and its Commentaries in the Tibetan Kagyü Tradition. 2 vols. Ithaca: Snow Lion, 2010 and 2011.
Chimpa, Lama and Alaka Chattopadhyaya, trans. Tāranātha’s History of Buddhism in India. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press, 1980.
Choong, Yoke Meei. Zum Problem der Leerheit (śūnyatā) in der Prajñāpāramitā. Frankfurt: Europäische Hochschulschriften, Reihe 27, Bd. 97, 2006, pp. 109–33.
Conze, Edward (1962). The Gilgit Manuscript of the Aṣṭādaśasāhasrikā-prajñāpāramitā: Chapters 50 to 55 corresponding to the 5th Abhisamaya. SOR 26. Rome: ISMEO, 1962.
———, trans. (1973). The Perfection of Wisdom in Eight Thousand Lines and Its Verse Summary. Bolinas, CA: Four Seasons Foundation, 1973.
——— (1974). The Gilgit Manuscript of the Aṣṭādaśasāhasrikā-prajñāpāramitā: Chapters 70 to 82 corresponding to the 6th, 7th, and 8th Abhisamayas. SOR 46. Rome: ISMEO, 1974.
——— (1975). The Large Sūtra on Perfect Wisdom: With the Divisions of the Abhisamayālaṅkāra. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975.
——— (1978). The Prajñāpāramitā Literature (Second edition). Tokyo: The Reiyukai, 1978.
Davidson, Ronald. “Studies in Dhāraṇī Literature I: Revisiting the Meaning of the Term Dhāraṇī.” Journal of Indian Philosophy 37, no. 2 (April 2009): 97–147.
Dayal, Har. The Bodhisattva Doctrine in Buddhist Sanskrit Literature. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1932. Reprinted Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1970.
Dharmachakra Translation Committee, trans. (2013). The Play in Full (Lalitavistara, Toh 95). 84000: Translating the Words of the Buddha, 2013.
——— (2019a). The Jewel Cloud (Ratnamegha, Toh 231). 84000: Translating the Words of the Buddha, 2019.
——— (2019b). The Precious Discourse on the Blessed One’s Extensive Wisdom That Leads to Infinite Certainty (Niṣṭhāgatabhagavajjñānavaipulyasūtraratnānanta, Toh 99). 84000: Translating the Words of the Buddha, 2019.
——— (2022). The Heart of the Perfection of Wisdom, the Blessed Mother (Bhagavatīprajñāpāramitāhṛdaya, Toh 21). 84000: Translating the Words of the Buddha, 2022.
Dorje, Gyurme, trans., (1987). “The Guhyagarbhatantra and its XIVth Century Tibetan Commentary Phyogs bcu mun sel.” 3 vols. PhD diss. University of London, School of Oriental and African Studies, 1987.
———, trans. (2012). Indo-Tibetan Classical Learning and Buddhist Phenomenology. Book 6, Parts 1–2 of Jamgön Kongtrul, The Treasury of Knowledge. Boston: Snow Lion, 2012.
Dudjom Rinpoche. The Nyingma School of Tibetan Buddhism: Its Fundamentals and History. 2 vols. Translated by Gyurme Dorje with Matthew Kapstein. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 1991.
Dutt, Nalinaksha. Pañcaviṃśati-sāhasrikā Prajñā-pāramitā. Calcutta Oriental Series 28. London: Luzac, 1934. Reprinted Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications, 1986.
Edgerton, Franklin. Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit Grammar and Dictionary. 2 vols. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1953.
Falk, Harry. “The ‘Split’ Collection of Kharoṣṭhī texts.” ARIRIAB 14 (2011): 13–23.
Falk, Harry, and Seishi Karashima (2012). “A first‐century Prajñāpāramitā manuscript from Gandhāra – parivarta 1 (Texts from the Split Collection 1).” ARIRIAB 15 (2012): 19–61.
——— (2013). “A first‐century Prajñāpāramitā manuscript from Gandhāra – parivarta 5 (Texts from the Split Collection 2).” ARIRIAB 16 (2013): 97–169.
Ghoṣa, Pratāpacandra, ed. Çatasāhasrikā prajñāpāramitā: A Theological and Philosophical Discourse of Buddha With His Disciples in A Hundred Thousand Stanzas. Calcutta: Asiatic Society of Bengal, 1902–14. Available as e-text on Göttingen Register of Electronic Texts in Indian Languages (GRETIL).
Herrmann-Pfandt, Adelheid. Die Lhan Kar Ma: Ein früher Katalog der ins Tibetische übersetzten buddhistischen Texte, Kritische Neuausgabe mit Einleitung und Materialien. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2008.
Hikata, Ryusho. Suvikrāntavikrāmi-paripṛcchā-Prajñāpāramitā-sūtra: Edited with an Introductory Essay. Fukuoka, 1958.
Hinüber, O. von. (1983) “Sieben Goldblätter einer Pañca-viṃśatisāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā aus Anurādhapura.” NAWG 7 (1983): 189–207.
——— (2014). “The Gilgit Manuscripts: An Ancient Library in Modern Research.” In From Birch Bark to Digital Data: Recent Advances in Buddhist Manuscript Research, edited by P. Harrison & J. Hartmann, 79–135. Vienna: 2014.
Kimura, Takayasu, ed. Śatasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā, II/1–4, 4 vols. Tokyo: Sankibo Busshorin, 2009 (II-1), 2010 (II-2, II-3), 2014 (II-4). Available as e-text (see links) on Göttingen Register of Electronic Texts in Indian Languages (GRETIL).
———, ed. Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā Prajñā-pāramitā, I–VIII, 6 vols. Tokyo: Sankibo Busshorin, 2007–9 (1-1, 1-2), 1986 (2-3), 1990 (4), 1992 (5), 2006 (6-8). Available as e-text on Göttingen Register of Electronic Texts in Indian Languages (GRETIL).
Kloetzli, Randy. Buddhist Cosmology. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1983.
Konow, Sten. The First Two Chapters of the Daśasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā: Restoration of the Sanskrit Text, Analysis and Index. Oslo: I Kommisjon Hos Jacob Dybwad, 1941.
Lamotte, Etienne (1998). Śūraṃgamasamādhisūtra: The Concentration of Heroic Progress, An Early Mahāyāna Buddhist Scripture. English translation by Sara Boin-Webb. London: Curzon Press.
——— (2001). The Treatise on the Great Virtue of Wisdom of Nāgārjuna (Mahāprajñāpāramitāśāstra). English translation by Gelongma Karma Migme Chodron. Unpublished electronic text, 2001.
Lethcoe, Nancy R., “Some Notes on the Relationship between the Abhisamayālaṅkāra, the Revised Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā and the Chinese Translations of the Unrevised Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā.” JAOS 96/4 (1976): 499–511.
Lopez, Donald S. The Heart Sūtra Explained: Indian and Tibetan Commentaries. Albany: SUNY, 1988.
Martini, Giuliana (a.k.a. Dhammadinnā). “Bodhisattva Texts, Ideologies and Rituals in Khotan in the Fifth and Sixth Centuries.” In Buddhism Among the Iranian Peoples of Central Asia, vol. 1 of Multilingualism and History of Knowledge, edited by Matteo de Chiara, Matteo, Mauro Maggi, and Giuliana Martini. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2013.
Ñāṇamoli, Bhikkhu, trans. The Path of Purification by Buddhaghosa. Kandy: Buddhist Publication Society, 1979.
Negi, J.S., ed. Tibetan Sanskrit Dictionary (bod skad dang legs sbyar gyi tshig mdzod chen mo). 16 vols. Sarnath: Central Institute of Higher Tibetan Studies, 1993–2005.
Ngawang Zangpo, trans. Jamgön Kongtrul, The Treasury of Knowledge (Books Two, Three, and Four): Buddhism’s Journey to Tibet. Ithaca, NY: Snow Lion Publications, 2010.
Nyima, Tudeng and Gyurme Dorje, trans. An Encyclopaedic Tibetan-English Dictionary. Vol. 1. Beijing and London: Nationalities Publishing House and SOAS, 2001.
Obermiller, E. Prajñapāramitā in Tibetan Buddhism. Delhi: Book Faith India (reprint), 1999.
Padmakara Translation Group, trans. The Transcendent Perfection of Wisdom in Ten Thousand Lines (Daśasāhasrikāprajñāpāramitā, Toh 11). 84000: Translating the Words of the Buddha, 2018.
Pagel, Ulrich “The Dhāraṇīs of Mahāvyutpatti # 748: Origins and Formation,” in Buddhist Studies Review 24 no. 2 (2007), 151–91.
Patrul Rinpoche. Kunzang Lama’i Shelung: The Words of My Perfect Teacher. Translated by the Padmakara Translation Group. Revised second edition, 1998. London: International Sacred Literature Trust and Sage Altamira, 1994–98.
Paranavitana, S. “Indikaṭusāya Copper Plaques.” EZ 3 (1933): 199–212.
Rhys Davids, Caroline A.F. Psalms of the Early Buddhists: II Psalms of the Brethren. London: Pali Text Society, 1913. See Internet Archive.
Sakya Pandita Translation Group, trans. The Sūtra on Reliance upon a Virtuous Spiritual Friend (Kalyāṇamitrasevanasūtra, Toh 300). 84000: Translating the Words of the Buddha, 2011.
Salomon, Richard (2014). “Gāndhārī Manuscripts in the British Library, Schøyen and Other Collections.” In From Birch Bark to Digital Data: Recent Advances In Buddhist Manuscript Research, Edited by Paul Harrison and Jens-Uwe Hartmann. Vienna: Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
——— (2018). The Buddhist Literature of Ancient Gandhāra: An Introduction with Selected Translations. Somerville, MA: Wisdom Publications.
Skilling, Peter, Prapod Assavavirulhakarn, Saerji: “Schøyen MS 2381/241 + 2382/uf18/2d + 2381/186: A (possible) Sanskrit parallel to the Pali Uruvela-sutta.” In Buddhist Manuscripts in the Schoyen Collection, Vol. IV, edited by Jens Braarvig and Jens-Uwe Hartmann. Oslo: Hermes Academic Publishing, 2013.
Sparham, Gareth, trans. (2006–2012). Abhisamayālaṃkāra with vṛtti and ālokā / vṛtti by Ārya Vimuktisena; ālokā by Haribhadra. 4 vols. Fremont, CA: Jain Publishing.
———, trans. (2022a). The Perfection of Wisdom in Eighteen Thousand Lines (Aṣṭādaśasāhasrikāprajñāpāramitā, Toh 10). 84000: Translating the Words of the Buddha.
———, trans. (2022b). The Long Explanation of the Noble Perfection of Wisdom in One Hundred Thousand, Twenty-Five Thousand, and Eighteen Thousand Lines (*Āryaśatasāhasrikāpañcaviṃśatisāhasrikāṣṭādaśasāhasrikāprajñāpāramitābṛhaṭṭīkā, Toh 3808). 84000: Translating the Words of the Buddha, 2022.
———, trans. (2024). The Perfection of Wisdom in One Hundred Thousand Lines (Śatasāhasrikāprajñāpāramitā, Toh 8). 84000: Translating the Words of the Buddha, 2024.
Stein, Lisa, and Ngawang Zangpo, trans. Butön’s History of Buddhism: In India and its Spread to Tibet, A Treasury of Priceless Scripture. Boston: Snow Lion, 2013.
Suzuki Kenta & Nagashima Jundo. “The Dunhuang Manuscript of the Larger Prajñāpāramitā.” In Buddhist Manuscripts from Central Asia: The British Library Sanskrit Fragments, vol. III/2, edited by S. Karashima, J. Nagashima & K. Wille: 593–821. Tokyo, 2015.
Vaidya, P.L. “Aṣṭasāhasrikā prajñāpāramitā.” In Buddhist Sanskrit Texts, vol. 4. Darbhanga: Mithila Institute, 1960. Available as e-text on Göttingen Register of Electronic Texts in Indian Languages (GRETIL).
Watanabe Shōgo, “A Comparative Study of the Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā.” JAOS 114/3 (1994): 386–96.
Zacchetti, Stefano (2005). In Praise of the Light: A Critical Synoptic Edition with an Annotated Translation of Chapters 1-3 of Dharmarakṣa’s Guang zan jing, Being the Earliest Chinese Translation of the Larger Prajñāpāramitā. Bibliotheca Philologica et Philosophica Buddhica, Vol. 8. The International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology. Tokyo: Soka University.
——— (2015). “Prajñāpāramitā Sūtras.” In Brill’s Encyclopedia of Buddhism, vol. 1, edited by Jonathan Silk. Leiden: Brill.
——— (2021). The Da zhidu lun 大智度論 (*Mahāprajñāpāramitopadeśa) and the History of the Larger Prajñāpāramitā: Patterns of Textual Variation in Mahāyāna Sūtra Literature. Numata Center for Buddhist Studies: Hamburg Buddhist Studies 14, edited by Michael Radich and Jonathan Silk. Bochum / Freiburg: Projekt Verlag, 2021.
Zürcher, Erik. The Buddhist Conquest of China: The Spread and Adaptation of Buddhism in Medieval China, 3rd ed. [1st ed. 1959] with a foreword by S. F. Teiser. Leiden: Brill (Sinica Leidensia 11), 2007.