The Chapter on Medicines
Chapter Eight
Toh 1-6
Degé Kangyur vol. 1 (’dul ba, ka), folios 277.b–311.a; vol. 2 (’dul ba, kha), folios 1.a–317.a; and vol. 3 (’dul ba, ga), folios 1.a–50.a
- Palgyi Lhünpo
- Sarvajñādeva
- Vidyākaraprabha
- Dharmākara
- Paltsek
Imprint
Translated by the Bhaiṣajyavastu Translation Team
under the patronage and supervision of 84000: Translating the Words of the Buddha
First published 2021
Current version v 1.1.3 (2024)
Generated by 84000 Reading Room v2.26.1
84000: Translating the Words of the Buddha is a global non-profit initiative to translate all the Buddha’s words into modern languages, and to make them available to everyone.
This work is provided under the protection of a Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND (Attribution - Non-commercial - No-derivatives) 3.0 copyright. It may be copied or printed for fair use, but only with full attribution, and not for commercial advantage or personal compensation. For full details, see the Creative Commons license.
Table of Contents
Summary
The Bhaiṣajyavastu, “The Chapter on Medicines,” is a part of the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya, the corpus of monastic law of one of the most influential Buddhist schools in India. This chapter deals with monastic regulations about medicines. At the same time, it also includes various elements not restricted to such rules: stories of the Buddha and his disciples, a lengthy story of the Buddha’s journey for the purpose of quelling an epidemic and converting a nāga, a number of stories of the Buddha’s former lives narrated by the Buddha himself, and a series of verses recited by the Buddha and his disciples about their former lives. Thus, this chapter preserves not only interesting information about medical knowledge shared by ancient Indian Buddhist monastics but also an abundance of Buddhist narrative literature.
Acknowledgements
This text was translated by the Bhaiṣajyavastu Translation Team. Fumi Yao translated the Tibetan text into English and prepared the ancillary materials. Shayne Clarke proofread the translation and ancillary materials.
The translation has been completed under the patronage and supervision of 84000: Translating the Words of the Buddha.
We gratefully acknowledge the generous sponsorship of Leo Tong Chen and his family; Zhang Wei, Li Mo, Zhang Mo Tong and Zhang Mo Lin; (Chi Xian Ren) Mao Gui Rong and Chi Mei; and Joseph Tse 謝偉傑, Patricia Tse 鄒碧玲 and family, in dedication to all eczema sufferers. Their support has helped make the work on this translation possible.
Text Body
The Chapter on Medicines
Chapter Eight
I. Ādirājya
II. Bhadrāśva
III. Mathurā
A. The Prediction about Upagupta454
“Certainly, O Honored One,” replied the venerable Ānanda to the Blessed One. Then the Blessed One went to Mathurā, where he saw a green forest rising in the distance. At the sight of it, he said to the venerable Ānanda, “Ānanda, do you see the green forest rising?”
“Yes, I do, O Honored One.”
“That is a mountain called Urumuṇḍa.455 When a hundred years have passed after I am completely emancipated, two brothers in Mathurā named Naṭa and Bhaṭa will build a monastery there. [F.123.a] Its name will therefore be Naṭabhaṭika, and it will become the best of the dwelling places that are suited to insight and tranquility.
“Ānanda, in this Mathurā there will be a son of a perfumer named Gupta. His son, Upagupta, will be a buddha without the marks. When a hundred years have passed after I am completely emancipated, he will perform the acts of a buddha, having gone forth in the teachings. The monk Ānanda’s co-residential pupil named Madhyandina will let Upagupta go forth.456 The last of the instructors will be Upagupta. There will be a cave that is eighteen cubits long, twelve cubits wide, and seven cubits high near that Naṭabhaṭika. Each of those who have been instructed by him to actualize the fruit of an arhat will throw a stick of four fingers’ breadth into the cave. When the cave has become full of the sticks of those arhats, Upagupta will be completely emancipated. After he has been completely emancipated, they will pile up the arhats’ sticks and cremate his body.”
B. The Former Life of Upagupta457
The monks, feeling doubtful, inquired of the Buddha, the Blessed One, the one who severs all doubts, “How is it, O Honored One, that the Blessed One has predicted the venerable Upagupta’s having compassion for many people in the future?”
“Listen, monks,” said the Blessed One, “and inscribe it in your minds how, not only in that time, but also previously, he acted for the benefit of many people. I will tell you about it.
“In a time long ago, monks, there lived self-awakened ones, ṛṣis, and monkeys on the three sides of this Mount Urumuṇḍa. On one side lived five hundred self-awakened ones, on the second five hundred ṛṣis, and on the third five hundred monkeys. Whenever a child of a monkey [F.123.b] was born, the leader of the monkeys used to kill it. Therefore, the female monkeys, out of sorrow for their children, began to discuss this among themselves: ‘Listen, ladies. Since every time a child is born to us, it is killed by this leader, we must devise a plan regarding this—when any one of us female monkeys has become pregnant, she should not tell the leader.’
“Later, when a female monkey became pregnant, they concealed her in a hidden place and fed her with roots and fruits. After the baby monkey was born, they also nourished and raised him in that hidden place. That monkey then grew up and banished the leader from his own troop. The leader began to wander around on Mount Urumuṇḍa. As he wandered he heard the voices of the self-awakened ones and approached them. When he felt comfortable living with them, he offered them roots, leaves, flowers, fruits, and toothpicks. They, too, gave him leftovers from their bowls. Whenever the self-awakened ones had finished their meal, they used to sit with their legs crossed. Observing their behavior, the monkey, too, sat with his legs crossed.
“Later, the self-awakened ones thought, ‘Since we have attained what is to be attained with our putrid bodies, we will enter the realm of peaceful emancipation.’ They displayed miracles, namely, blazing fire, radiating light, and causing rain to fall and lightning to strike, and they were completely emancipated in the realm of emancipation without remainder.
“They therefore did not rise at their usual hour of rising. When he did not see them, the monkey became anxious. The monkey entered the cave and shook their robes. Then [F.124.a] a deity living in the cave thought, ‘If this monkey destroys the bodies of the self-awakened ones, that would not be appropriate.’ He shut the entrance with a large stone slab and stood there. The monkey felt sorrow and pain and lamentation, and so he departed and wandered on Mount Urumuṇḍa. Anxious, and missing the humans, he strained his ears to hear a human voice, and soon he heard the voices spoken by those ṛṣis. Just like a lost traveler, he hurried to them.
“Those ṛṣis were harming themselves with horrible ascetic practices: some were keeping their hands raised, some were standing on one foot, and some were tormenting themselves with fivefold heat.458 When the monkey felt comfortable living with them, he offered them roots, leaves, flowers, fruits, and toothpicks. They, too, gave him their leftovers. Disrupting their behavior, he taught them the behavior of the self-awakened ones: there he lowered the hands of those who were keeping their hands raised, snapped his fingers, and sat down before them with his legs crossed; he lowered the legs of those who were standing on one foot and sat down before them with his legs crossed; and he put out the fires of those who were tormenting themselves with fivefold heat, snapped his fingers, and sat down before them with his legs crossed. Then the ṛṣis said to their instructor, ‘Master, this monkey interrupts our ascetic practice,’ and they explained everything to him in detail.
“ ‘Sirs,’ he replied, ‘these monkeys have good memories. Since he has certainly seen such behavior by some other ṛṣis, you should sit with your legs crossed, too.’
“When they sat with their legs crossed, their previous roots of merit [F.124.b] became manifest. They generated the thirty-seven aspects of awakening with knowledge, without a teacher or preceptor, and actualized the awakening of self-awakened ones. They directed the faith that had emerged from the Dharma to the monkey. Whenever they received fresh crops, fresh fruits, or seasonal foods as alms from people, they gave him some of the food first and after that enjoyed the rest of the food for themselves.
“Later, the monkey died. The self-awakened ones gathered fragrant wood from various areas and directions, heaped up all the fragrant wood, and cremated his body.
“What do you think, monks? That monkey who lived with the self-awakened ones was indeed this Upagupta. At that time, he acted for the benefit of many people. And now, too, I have predicted his benefiting and having compassion for many people.”
C. The Brahmin Nīlabhūti459
Thereupon The Blessed One, traveling in Śūrasena, went to Mathurā.460 Some brahmins in Mathurā heard that the śramaṇa Gautama had arrived in Mathurā and that, with the strong wish to purify the four castes, he explained, designated, defined, analyzed, expounded, clarified, taught, and perfectly taught. They thought, “If he enters Mathurā, he will be an obstacle to us gaining profit and honors. Since it is known that he is concerned about disrespectful acts, if someone performs disrespectful acts toward him, he will not stay in Mathurā. It would not be surprising if someone from a lowly family performed disrespectful acts toward him, but it would be more effective if some great person did so. Is there any great person among us?”
At that time there was a brahmin in Mathurā [F.125.a] named Nīlabhūti, who had mastered the Vedas and the auxiliary branches of the Vedas, who was able to present his own words clearly and defeat others’ criticisms, and whose words followed the truth. Then the brahmins in Mathurā met together, flocked together, went to Nīlabhūti, and said, “Master, it has been heard that the śramaṇa Gautama has come here and that, with the strong wish to purify the four castes, he … perfectly teaches. Since it is known that he is concerned about disrespectful acts, if someone performs disrespectful acts toward him, he will not stay in Mathurā. It would not be surprising if someone from a lowly family performed disrespectful acts toward him, but it would be more effective if some great person did so. Who else but you is the great person among us? Please revile him with disrespectful words of blame.”
“Sirs,” said Nīlabhūti, “this tongue of mine follows the truth. If he deserves revilement, I will revile him. But if he deserves praise, I will praise him.”
After that, the brahmin Nīlabhūti, attended by the elder brahmins living in Mathurā, went to the Blessed One. The brahmin Nīlabhūti saw from a distance the Blessed One, whose body was fully ornamented with the thirty-two marks of a great man, illuminated by the eighty minor marks, ornamented with a fathom-wide halo, and beautiful like a moving mountain of jewels with light surpassing a thousand suns, sitting tranquilly under a tree. Upon seeing him, the brahmin opened his eyes wide with astonishment and began to praise the Blessed One:
When Nīlabhūti had praised the Blessed One with five hundred verses of praise, including those just recounted, and thus was filled with faith, the Blessed One preached the Dharma for him, so that he saw the truths, sitting on that very seat. After that, the brahmin Nīlabhūti, having praised the Blessed One, departed. When he was walking along the road, the brahmins in Mathurā scolded him: “Sir, we asked you to perform disrespectful acts toward the śramaṇa Gautama. Are you now coming back, having praised him?”
D. The Obstruction of the Buddha’s Way by a Goddess
The Blessed One dressed early one morning, took his bowl and his robe, and entered Mathurā for alms. At that time, it was the day of the star festival in Mathurā. A goddess living in Mathurā thought, “If the śramaṇa Gautama comes to Mathurā, he will interrupt my star festival.” She then stood naked before the Blessed One. The Blessed One said, “O goddess, a woman does not look beautiful even if she is covered with clothes, let alone naked.”
Then the goddess was ashamed, and she left to one side of the road. After that, the Blessed One himself left the road and sat on the seat prepared for him in front of the community of monks. Having sat down, the Blessed One said to the monks, “Monks, there are five disadvantages of Mathurā:471 the land is uneven; [F.128.a] it is full of logs and thorns; there are many stones, pebbles, and gravel there; people eat in the evening;472 and there are many women there.”
E. The Yakṣa Gardabha
Thereupon the Blessed One, not going farther down the road, went to the residence of the yakṣa Gardabha473 near Mathurā. When he arrived, he entered the residence of the yakṣa Gardabha and sat under a tree to pass the day there.
At that time474 the yakṣa Gardabha used to walk around in the form of an ass (gardabha). When boys or girls wanted to ride on him, he would let them ride on his back, pleasing them in that way, and then go to a dense forest and eat them. Therefore he was named “the yakṣa Gardabha.”
When the devout brahmins and householders in Mathurā heard that the Blessed One had come for alms, but, waylaid by a goddess, had not entered Mathurā but had gone to the residence of the yakṣa Gardabha, they cooked and prepared a pure and fine meal in pots, loaded the food on a carriage, and went to the Blessed One. Upon their arrival, they bowed low until their foreheads touched the Blessed One’s feet, and then they sat down to one side. When they had sat down to one side, the Blessed One, through talk consistent with the Dharma, instructed … the devout brahmins and householders in Mathurā. After he had … delighted them … the Blessed One remained silent. Then the devout brahmins and householders in Mathurā rose from their seats, draped their upper robes over one shoulder, made the gesture of supplication to the Blessed One, and said to him, “O Honored One, we have brought here a carriage full of pure and fine food for the Blessed One. May the Blessed One have compassion for us [F.128.b] and accept this food.”
The Blessed One said to the venerable Ānanda, “Ānanda, go and gather all the monks living near the residence of the yakṣa Gardabha in the assembly room. I will let them have the almsfood.”
“Certainly, O Honored One,” replied the venerable Ānanda to the Blessed One. Having gathered all the monks living near the residence of the yakṣa Gardabha in the assembly room, he went to the Blessed One. When he arrived, he bowed low until his forehead touched the Blessed One’s feet, and then he sat down to one side. Having sat down to one side, the venerable Ānanda said to the Blessed One, “O Honored One, all the monks living near the residence of the yakṣa Gardabha are gathered in the assembly room. May the Blessed One know it is the right time.”
Thereupon the Blessed One went to the assembly room and sat on the seat prepared for him in front of the community of monks. The devout brahmins and householders in Mathurā then knew that the community of monks headed by the Buddha had sat down in comfort, … knowing the Blessed One had … washed his hands and his bowl, they sat before the Blessed One in order to ask a favor. They said, “O Honored One, the Blessed One has converted the wicked nāgas So-and-so and the wicked yakṣas So-and-so. O Honored One, this yakṣa Gardabha has for a long time been hostile toward us who are not hostile, adversarial toward us who are not adversarial, and injurious to us who have not been injurious, [F.129.a] and he snatches our children away whenever one is born.475 May the Blessed One have compassion and convert the yakṣa Gardabha.”
At that time the yakṣa Gardabha himself was sitting in the assembly. The Blessed One asked the yakṣa Gardabha, “Gardabha, did you hear this?”
“O Blessed One, I did.”
“O Sugata, I did.”
“Quit that inferior, evil conduct.”
“O Honored One, if they promise to have a monastery for the community of monks of the four directions built for my sake, I will stop.”
Then the Blessed One asked the devout brahmins and householders in Mathurā, “Brahmins and householders, did you hear this?”
“O Blessed One, we did. We will build it.”
Then the Blessed One converted the yakṣa Gardabha, along with his five hundred attendants. The devout brahmins and householders built five hundred monasteries for his sake. In the same way, the Blessed One converted the yakṣa Śara, the yakṣa Vana, and the yakṣiṇī Ālikāvendāmaghā.
Thereupon the Blessed One entered Mathurā using his magical power. Once there, he converted the yakṣiṇī Timisikā, along with her five hundred attendants, and five hundred monasteries were built for her sake. After that, the Blessed One converted twenty-five hundred yakṣas inside and outside Mathurā, and the devout brahmins and householders built twenty-five hundred monasteries for their sake.
IV. Otalā Park
A. The Visit of the Brahmin Otalāyana476
Thereupon the Blessed One went to Otalā and stayed in Otalā Forest near Otalā.
There lived a very wealthy brahmin477 named Otalāyana, who was rich and had great wealth and many possessions . . . .
The478 Blessed One [F.129.b] dressed early in the morning, took his bowl and his robe, and entered Otalā for alms. In a certain place, five hundred peasants were plowing a field in their hempen lower garments, their heads covered with dust. The peasants saw the Blessed One, who was fully ornamented with the thirty-two marks of a great man, … and beautiful … with light . . . . The Blessed One preached the Dharma for them … and they became objects of veneration, respect, and praise.
Then the thousand oxen broke their yokes and the ropes around their horns and went themselves to the Blessed One. When they arrived, they sat down, surrounding the Blessed One. When the Blessed One had preached the Dharma that consists of three phrases for them,479 they were reborn among the gods attendant on the Four Great Kings. . . . Having seen the truths, they left for their own residences.
The monks, feeling doubtful, inquired of the Buddha, the Blessed One, the one who severs all doubts, “O Honored One, what karma did these five hundred peasants and these oxen480 create that matured to cause them to be born as peasants in poor families and to become oxen?”
“Monks, the actions were performed and accumulated by them . . . . These people went forth in the teachings of the Perfectly Awakened One Kāśyapa. They there spent their time lazily; that karma matured to cause them to become peasants. These oxen, too, went forth there, and they disregarded the minor rules of training; that karma matured to cause them to be reborn among animals. Their karma of going forth in the teachings of the Perfectly Awakened One Kāśyapa matured to cause them to see the truths in my presence. Therefore, monks, [F.130.a] the maturation of entirely negative actions is . . . . ”
The very wealthy brahmin Otalāyana heard the following:481 “A śramaṇa, a son of the Śākyans from the Śākyan clan, one who went forth from his home into homelessness with true faith, having shaved off his hair and beard and donned saffron robes, was awakened to complete and supreme awakening, and he has arrived at Otalā, having traveled in Śūrasena, and is staying in Otalā Forest. Sirs, the great virtue, fame, renown, and praise of that śramaṇa Gautama are known in all directions. Thus, that Blessed One is a tathāgata, an arhat, a perfectly awakened one, perfect in knowledge and conduct, a sugata, world knowing, a supreme tamer of people to be tamed, a teacher of gods and humans, a buddha, and a blessed one. Having in this life, by his own supernormal knowledge, actualized and accomplished awakening, he announced to the world with its gods, Māra, Brahmā, people such as śramaṇas and brahmins, and beings such as gods and humans, ‘My defilements have been exhausted. The pure life has been lived. What is to be done has been done. I will not know another existence after this one.’ He teaches only the Dharma that is good in the beginning, good in the middle, good at the end, excellent in meaning, excellent in wording, distinct, complete, pure, and immaculate.”
Thinking that it would be good to see, approach, and serve such a śramaṇa or brahmin, he left Otalā, riding an entirely white chariot pulled by mares, surrounded and followed by young brahmins, carrying a golden water jar with a handle, [F.130.b] and went to see and serve the Blessed One. Having gone as far as he could go by vehicle, he alighted from the vehicle and entered the park on foot. The very wealthy brahmin Otalāyana went to the Blessed One, and when he arrived, he made plenty of pleasant and joyful conversation with the Blessed One, and then sat down to one side. Having sat down to one side, the very wealthy brahmin Otalāyana said to the Blessed One, “O Gautama, the five faculties have separate fields and separate domains, and each of them experiences its own field and domain but does not experience other fields and domains: namely, the faculty of the eyes, the faculty of the ears, the faculty of the nose, the faculty of the tongue, and the faculty of the body. What experiences the fields and domains of these? What is the basis of these?”
“O brahmin,482 the five faculties do have separate fields and separate domains: namely, the faculty of the eyes, the faculty of the ears, the faculty of the nose, the faculty of the tongue, and the faculty of the body. It is mind that experiences the fields and domains of these. The basis of these is mind.”
“O brahmin, the basis of mind is mindfulness.”
“O brahmin, the basis of mindfulness is the four applications of mindfulness.”
“O Gautama, what is the basis of the four applications of mindfulness?”
“O brahmin, the basis of the four applications of mindfulness is the seven limbs of awakening.”
“O Gautama, what is the basis of the seven limbs of awakening?”
“O brahmin, the basis of the seven limbs of awakening is knowledge and liberation.”
“O brahmin, the basis of knowledge and liberation is nirvāṇa.”
“O brahmin, this is great nonsense, this is great nonsense. The end of such questions will never be reached. In my presence, for the purpose of destroying suffering and bringing suffering to an end, the pure life is led, which approaches nirvāṇa and has nirvāṇa as its end.”483
Then the brahmin Otalāyana thought, “What harm should I do to him?” He had heard before that if one invites the śramaṇa Gautama with the community of disciples, offers them a meal, and forms an aspiration, he will attain all that he wants and seeks. Then the brahmin Otalāyana rose from his seat, draped his upper robe over one shoulder, made the gesture of supplication to the Blessed One, and said to him, “May the Blessed One together with the community of monks assent to my offer of a meal at my house tomorrow.” … Knowing the Blessed One had … washed his hands and his bowl, he took a low seat, sat before the Blessed One, and made this aspiration: “May all these śramaṇas, sons of the Śākyans, whom I have offered a meal, become my oxen.”
The Blessed One, knowing the brahmin Otalāyana’s mind with his own mind, said to the brahmin Otalāyana, “O brahmin, you have conceived an undesirable thought; it will not be accomplished. Since all these monks have destroyed their future existences, you should conceive another thought.” Having assigned the rewards of the offerings, the Blessed One departed.
After that, [F.131.b] the Blessed One went to the monastery and sat on the seat prepared for him in front of the community of monks. Having sat down, the Blessed One said to the monks, “Monks, since the brahmin Otalāyana conceived an evil thought and made an inappropriate aspiration, you should recite ‘Verses of the Ṛṣi’484 after having had a meal; then such an inappropriate aspiration will not be accomplished.”485
B. Kacaṅgalā486
Thereupon the Blessed One, after the night had passed, entered Otalā for alms with the venerable Ānanda, the attending śramaṇa.487 There lived an old female slave488 named Kacaṅgalā in Otalā. When she went to the well, taking a pitcher with her, the Blessed One went to that place, too. The Blessed One, knowing it was the time to convert her, said to the venerable Ānanda, “Ānanda, go and say to that old woman, ‘The Blessed One is thirsty; please give me some water.’ ”
“Certainly, O Honored One,” replied the venerable Ānanda to the Blessed One, and he went to Kacaṅgalā, the old woman. When he reached her, he said, “Kacaṅgalā, the Blessed One is thirsty; please give me some water.”
“O noble one, I will bring it to him myself,” she replied.
Then Kacaṅgalā filled the pitcher with water and hurried to the Blessed One. As soon as Kacaṅgalā saw the Blessed One, who was fully ornamented with the thirty-two marks of a great man, illuminated by the eighty minor marks, ornamented with a fathom-wide halo, and beautiful like a moving mountain of jewels with light surpassing a thousand suns, she conceived the love one has for a son. Raising her hands, she tried to embrace the Blessed One and cried, “Son! Son!”489 The monks prevented her.
Because the Blessed One allowed her to embrace him around the neck, her attachment to her son calmed down, and she sat before the Blessed One to hear the Dharma. The Blessed One knew her thinking, proclivity, disposition, and nature and preached the Dharma that was appropriate for her and that caused her to penetrate the four truths of the noble ones. When she had heard the Dharma, Kacaṅgalā leveled the twenty high peaks of the mountain chain of the false view of individuality with the vajra of knowledge, and actualized the fruit of stream-entry. After having seen the four truths of the noble ones, she spoke an inspired utterance three times: “O Honored One, what the Blessed One has done for me is what has never been done for me by my father, my mother, . . . . With the vajra of knowledge I have leveled the twenty high peaks of the mountain chain of the false view of individuality that have been accumulated since beginningless time, and actualized the fruit of stream-entry.” And then she spoke these verses:
Having spoken thus, she bowed low until her forehead touched the Blessed One’s feet, and then departed from the Blessed One’s presence.
Later, Kacaṅgalā went to the Blessed One, having gained permission from her master. When she arrived, [F.132.b] she bowed low until her forehead touched the Blessed One’s feet, and then she sat down to one side. Having sat down to one side, she said to the Blessed One, “O Honored One, I wish to go forth and be ordained a nun in the well-taught Dharma and Vinaya. I will lead the pure life in the presence of the Blessed One.”
The Blessed One entrusted her to Mahāprajāpatī. Thereupon Mahāprajāpatī let her go forth, ordained her, and instructed her. Exerting herself, endeavoring, and striving, she abandoned all the defilements, actualized the state of an arhantī, and became an arhantī. She was free from desire for the three realms … became an object of … praise.491 [B37]
When the Blessed One had briefly preached to the nuns a sermon and entered the monastery to go into seclusion, Kacaṅgalā fully expanded on the teaching. After that, the Blessed One said to the monks, “Monks, among my nuns, female disciples who analyze the sūtras, this nun Kacaṅgalā is the best.”
The monks, feeling doubtful, inquired of the Buddha, the Blessed One, the one who severs all doubts, “O Honored One, what karma did Kacaṅgalā create that matured to cause her to go forth after she became old? What karma did she create that matured to cause her to be a poor female slave, cause the Blessed One not to enter into her womb for his last birth, and cause her to realize the state of an arhantī after going forth, and to be praised by the Blessed One as the best of those who analyze the sūtras?”
“Monks,” the Blessed One replied, “the actions were performed and accumulated by the nun Kacaṅgalā herself, accruing a heap of karma. . . . .
“Monks, when I once was engaged in the conduct of a bodhisattva, she was my mother. She stopped me when I wished to go forth; that karma matured to cause her to go forth after she became old. When I gave a donation, she interfered; because of this, she became poor. She did not perform great actions that would generate the great power of merit as Mahāmāyā did; therefore, I did not enter her womb for my last birth. Having gone forth in the presence of the Perfectly Awakened One Kāśyapa, she uttered the words ‘slave woman’ against nuns, both those who were practitioners undergoing training and those who were practitioners having completed training; therefore, she became a female slave. There, through recitation and repetition, she became familiar with the aggregates, spheres, and elements, dependent origination, and what is proper and what is improper; therefore, she abandoned all the defilements and actualized the state of an arhantī, having gone forth in my teaching. Since her preceptress who had ordained her had been praised by the Perfectly Awakened One Kāśyapa as the best of those who analyzed the sūtras, this woman made this aspiration at the time of her death:492 ‘While I have led the pure life throughout my life in the presence of the Blessed One, the Perfectly Awakened One Kāśyapa, the supreme one worthy of veneration, I have not yet attained any good qualities. By this root of merit, may I go forth in the teachings of the Buddha Śākyamuni whom the young brahmin named Uttara was predicted to become by the Blessed One, the Perfectly Awakened One Kāśyapa:493 “Young brahmin, you will become a tathāgata, an arhat, a perfectly awakened one called Śākyamuni when people’s lifespans are a hundred years long.” As this preceptress of mine was praised [F.133.b] as the best of those who analyze the sūtras, may I too be praised as the best of those who analyze the sūtras by the Blessed One Śākyamuni.’ Because of this wish, she was praised by me as the best of those who analyze the sūtras.
“Therefore, monks, the maturation of entirely negative actions is entirely negative … you should seek . . . . Monks, that is how you must train.” Thus spoke the Blessed One.
V. Vairambhya
A. The Brahmin in a Park
Thereupon the Blessed One said to the venerable Ānanda, “Ānanda, let us go to the country of Vairambhya.”
“Certainly, O Honored One,” replied the venerable Ānanda to the Blessed One. After that, the Blessed One departed. At that time, in a certain park a brahmin was beginning to sprinkle the park with water, having drawn water from a well. When the brahmin saw the Blessed One from a distance, he thought, “If the śramaṇa Gautama enters the park, the park and the water will be polluted,” and he shut the gate, hid the rope and pitcher, and sat down.
Then the Blessed One entered the park using his magical power. Pāñcika, the great general of yakṣas, seized the well and submerged the entire park in water. Then the brahmin understood, “This śramaṇa Gautama is of great magical power and dignity.” Filled with faith, he said, “O honorable Gautama, come. Here is a rope; here is a pitcher. Please accept water in comfort.”
The Blessed One then spoke a verse:
Then the brahmin said to the Blessed One, “O Honored One, I wish to go forth and be ordained a monk in the well-taught Dharma and Vinaya . . . .” The Blessed One ordained him by saying “Come, monk,” . . . .
He, exerting himself, endeavoring, and striving, abandoned all the defilements, actualized the state of an arhat, and became an arhat. He was free from desire for the three realms … became an object of … praise . . . .
B. King Agnidatta’s Offer496
Afterward the Blessed One, traveling in Śūrasena, arrived at Vairambhya and stayed under the neem tree of Naḍera near Vairambhya.
At that time, a brahmin king497 named Agnidatta ruled over Vairambhya, which was rich, prosperous, peaceful, abundant in food, and full of many people. When Agnidatta, the brahmin king, heard that the śramaṇa Gautama, having traveled through Śūrasena, had arrived in Vairambhya and was staying under the neem tree of Naḍera near Vairambhya, he thought, “The śramaṇa Gautama is treated with honor, looked up to, esteemed, venerated, and paid homage to as a worthy man by all the neighboring kings. If I do not treat him with honor, the neighboring kings will reproach me: ‘Sirs, what a fool Agnidatta, the brahmin king, is! While the śramaṇa Gautama has come and is staying in his town, his country, the king does not treat him with honor.’ Now I will offer the śramaṇa Gautama [F.134.b] together with the community of disciples all the requisites.” Having thought this, he went to the Blessed One, displaying great royal treasures and great royal power. When he arrived, he made plenty of pleasant and joyful conversation with the Blessed One, and then sat down to one side. When Agnidatta, the brahmin king, had sat down to one side, the Blessed One, through talk consistent with the Dharma, . . . . When he had … delighted him…, the Blessed One remained silent. Then Agnidatta, the brahmin king, rose from his seat, draped his upper robe over one shoulder, made the gesture of supplication to the Blessed One, and said to the Blessed One, “May the honorable Gautama with the community of disciples assent to my offer of the requisites for three months: namely, robes, almsfood, bedding and seats, and medicines for the sick.” The Blessed One assented to Agnidatta, the brahmin king, by remaining silent. Then Agnidatta, the brahmin king, knowing that the Blessed One had assented by remaining silent, rejoiced in and praised the words of the Blessed One, and he rose from his seat and departed.
He went to his own residence and ordered his ministers, “Every day cook eighteen kinds of food, various kinds of bean paste, tasty sauce, and much rice for five hundred people.” Then he proclaimed with the ringing of bells: “None but I should offer meals to the śramaṇa Gautama for three months. Anyone who offers him a meal will be killed as punishment.”
After issuing this proclamation with the ringing of bells, he dreamt while sleeping in the night that the entire city of Vairambhya was encircled with his own intestine.498 Having dreamt this, [F.135.a] he sprang to his feet from his large bed, frightened and dejected, with the hairs in every pore of his body standing on end. He sat plunged into grief, resting his cheek on his hand, asking himself, “Oh, is there any chance I will lose my throne or be in danger of death because of this?” After the night had passed, he said to the brahmin who was the chief priest, “Sir, I have dreamt such-and-such. What should I do about this?”
The brahmin chief priest thought, “The king has had an auspicious dream. Since, if I speak well of it, he will increase his faith in the śramaṇa Gautama all the more, I will now speak ill of it.” He said, “Your Majesty, this is an inauspicious dream.”
“Sir, what will be the result of this?”
“Your Majesty, you will certainly lose your throne or be in danger of death.”
“Ah,” thought the king, “I am losing my throne or am in danger of death!” With this thought, he asked the brahmin, the chief priest, “Is there any good way to avoid losing my throne and being in danger of death?”
“If Your Majesty will stay in a concealed location for three months,” said the brahmin, “then Your Majesty will neither lose his throne nor be in danger of death.”
Agnidatta, the brahmin king, thought, “If so, that is easy to do. I will make a proclamation with the ringing of bells.” He proclaimed throughout the country with the ringing of bells: “No one should come to see me for three months. Anyone who comes to me will be killed as punishment.” After issuing this proclamation with the ringing of bells, he did stay in a concealed location for three months.
The venerable Ānanda rose at dawn and went to the residence of Agnidatta, the brahmin king. There he saw the laborers of Agnidatta, the brahmin king, sitting idle. When he saw this, he asked them, “Sirs, [F.135.b] why are you sitting idle?”
“O noble one, what should we be doing?”
“Has Agnidatta, the brahmin king, not offered all the requisites for three months to the community of monks headed by the Buddha? You are sitting idle, not preparing a meal or arranging seats. Has the meal for the community of monks headed by the Buddha been cancelled?”
“O noble one Ānanda,” they replied, “although His Majesty has ordered us to prepare good food abundantly for five hundred people, he has not indicated for whom it is.”
“Sirs, now ask His Majesty about this.”
“O noble one, His Majesty has proclaimed with the ringing of bells: ‘No one should come to see me for three months. Anyone who comes to me will be killed as punishment.’ Do any of us have two heads? We will not ask him.”
Thereupon the venerable Ānanda went to the Blessed One. When he arrived, he reported this to the Blessed One in detail. The Blessed One then issued this instruction to the venerable Ānanda: “Ānanda, go and take your outer robe. Call out, with an attending śramaṇa, in wide streets, in markets, at crossroads, and at three-forked roads in Vairambhya, ‘Sirs, whoever among you can offer meals for three months to the community of monks headed by the Buddha should do so.’ ”
“Certainly, O Honored One,” replied the venerable Ānanda to the Blessed One. He took his outer robe and called out, with an attending śramaṇa, in wide streets, in markets, at crossroads, and at three-forked roads in Vairambhya, “Sirs, whoever among you can offer meals for three months to the community of monks headed by the Buddha should do so.”
The brahmins and [F.136.a] householders in Vairambhya said, “O noble one Ānanda, although each of us could offer meals for three months to the Blessed One together with the community of disciples, this evil king has proclaimed with the ringing of bells: ‘None but I should offer meals to the śramaṇa Gautama for three months. Anyone who offers a meal will be killed as punishment.’ ”
At that time, a caravan leader with five hundred loaded horses arrived at Vairambhya from the northern region. He thought, “If I depart soon, the hooves of the horses will be worn out, and they will become lame and unfit for sale.499 I will stay here.”
He stayed there and prepared two prasthas of barley for the best horse and one prastha for each of the rest of the horses. He heard that the king had issued such-and-such a regulation, and that the venerable Ānanda had called out such-and-such, and thought, “Since I am not an inhabitant of this king’s country, the king cannot do anything against me.” He said to the venerable Ānanda, “O noble one Ānanda, I have prepared two prasthas of barley for my best horse and one prastha for each of the rest of the horses. If the Blessed One can eat barley, I will offer two prasthas of barley for the Blessed One and one prastha for each of the rest of the monks.”
Thereupon the venerable Ānanda went to the Blessed One. When he arrived, he reported this to the Blessed One in detail. The Blessed One thought, “The actions were performed and accumulated by me, accruing a heap of karma. The conditions have ripened, and they approach me like a flood, inevitably. Who else but me [F.136.b] would experience the actions that I myself performed and accumulated? Actions performed and accumulated do not mature in the element of earth, … which are outside the body. . . .
He instructed the venerable Ānanda, “Ānanda, go and distribute counting sticks and say, ‘Whoever among you can eat barley with the Tathāgata in Vairambhya for three months should take a counting stick.’ ”
“Certainly, O Honored One,” replied the venerable Ānanda, and he distributed the counting sticks. The Blessed One and four hundred ninety-eight monks took counting sticks.
“O Blessed One,” said the venerable Śāriputra, “since I have a wind illness, I cannot eat barley for three months.”
“I will take care of him,” offered the venerable Mahāmaudgalyāyana.
Thereupon the Blessed One entered the rainy-season retreat with the four hundred ninety-eight monks in Vairambhya. The venerable Śāriputra and the venerable Mahāmaudgalyāyana went to Mount Triśaṅku and there entered the rainy-season retreat. Śakra, Lord of the Gods, fed them with divine nectar. The caravan leader offered two prasthas of barley for the Blessed One and one prastha for each of the rest of the monks.
Then the Blessed One instructed the venerable Ānanda, “Ānanda, go and have the barley cooked for the Tathāgata.”
“Certainly, O Honored One,” replied the venerable Ānanda, and he took the Blessed One’s portion and went to a certain old woman. When he arrived, he asked the woman, “Sister, can you cook barley for the Tathāgata?”
“O noble one,” she answered, [F.137.a] “I cannot, because I am too old. But since that girl is younger, have her do it. She will cook it.”501
The venerable Ānanda then went to the younger woman and asked, “Sister, can you cook barley for the Tathāgata?”
“O noble one,” she answered, “if you promise to give me a discourse, I will.”
“Make ready,” he replied. “I will do so.”
Then she asked while grinding the barley, “O noble one, what is the Buddha?”
The venerable Ānanda thought, “Since the qualities of the Buddha are profound, it is likely that if I relate to her the praises of the Buddha, she will not be able to understand them. Now I will relate to her the praises of a wheel-turning king.”502 He said, “Sister, if a wheel-turning king appears in the world, seven treasures appear in the world, too. What are the seven? They are the precious chakra, elephant, horse, jewel, woman, householder, and minister.503
“Sister, what is the precious chakra that appears in the world when a wheel-turning king appears in the world? Sister, here, when an anointed kṣatriya king, having washed his head and fasted on the day of poṣadha that is the fifteenth of the month, sits down on the terrace, surrounded by his ministers, the precious chakra appears from the east. It consists of a hub, a thousand spokes, and a rim and is perfect in every respect, fair, not made by an artisan, but excellent, and made entirely of gold. This anointed kṣatriya king thinks, ‘I have heard that on the day of poṣadha that is the fifteenth of the month [F.137.b] … made entirely of gold, he will be a wheel-turning king. Certainly I have become a wheel-turning king.’
“Then the wheel-turning king, wishing to examine the precious chakra, rises from his seat, puts his upper robe over one shoulder, kneels on his right knee, accepts the precious chakra with his hands, puts it on his left hand, and, raising it with his right hand, says, ‘O precious chakra, conquer, conquer through the noble path of wheel-turning kings of the past.’
“Then the precious chakra, having been raised by the wheel-turning king, soars up into the air and heads off to the east, through the noble path of wheel-turning kings of the past. Following the precious chakra, the wheel-turning king proceeds with his army consisting of four divisions. Wherever the precious chakra stays, the wheel-turning king with his army consisting of four divisions builds residences there. Those who are minor kings of the eastern region go to the wheel-turning king. When they arrive, they say to the wheel-turning king, ‘Come, Your Majesty. Welcome, Your Majesty. These countries, which are rich, prosperous, peaceful, abundant in food, and full of many people, are Your Majesty’s. May Your Majesty rule over them. We will do as Your Majesty orders.’
“He replies, ‘Then, lords, each of you should rule over each country lawfully, not unlawfully. If someone’s conduct is unlawful or a mixture of lawful and unlawful, you should not let him live in your country. In that way, you will be the ones who do as I order.’ [F.138.a]
“Then the precious chakra, having conquered the eastern region, returns from the eastern great ocean. It goes to the south, west, and north, through the noble path of wheel-turning kings of the past. Then,504 having been raised by the wheel-turning king, it soars up into the air and goes to the north, through the noble path of wheel-turning kings of the past.
“Following the precious chakra, the wheel-turning king proceeds with his army consisting of four divisions. Wherever the precious chakra stays, the wheel-turning king with his army consisting of four divisions builds residences there. Those who are minor kings of the northern region go to the wheel-turning king. When they arrive, they say to the wheel-turning king, ‘Come, Your Majesty. Welcome, Your Majesty. These countries, which are rich, prosperous, peaceful, abundant in food, and full of many people, are Your Majesty’s. May Your Majesty rule over them. We will do as Your Majesty orders.’
“He replies, ‘Then, lords, each of you should rule over each country lawfully, not unlawfully. If someone’s conduct is unlawful or a mixture of lawful and unlawful, you should not let him live in your country. In that way, you will be the ones who do as I order.’
“Then the precious chakra, having conquered the northern region, returns from the northern great ocean and stays on top of the treasury,505 just as an axis is placed.
“Sister, if a wheel-turning king appears in the world, such a precious chakra appears in the world.
“Sister, what is the precious elephant that appears in the world when a wheel-turning king appears in the world? [F.138.b]
“Sister, here the elephant of a wheel-turning king is white as the color of a kumuda flower, and the seven parts of its body are well supported. It is well proportioned, attractive, and pleasant to behold. Having seen this, his mind filled with joy, the wheel-turning king thinks, ‘Ah, this precious elephant is good. I will have it trained quickly.’
“Then the wheel-turning king summons a skillful elephant trainer by messenger and orders him, ‘O gentle sir, you should quickly train this precious elephant well and bring it to me.’
“ ‘Certainly, Your Majesty,’ replies the skillful elephant trainer to the wheel-turning king, and he trains the precious elephant in all kinds of ways for one day. When he trains it in all kinds of ways for one day, it learns all of it in that very day. Just as other elephants learn all kinds of training only after being taught for many years, a great number of years, when the precious elephant is trained in all kinds of ways for just one day, it learns all of it in that very day. Knowing it to have been well trained, he brings it to the wheel-turning king and says, ‘Your Majesty, the good, precious elephant has been trained. May Your Majesty know it is the right time.’ Thereupon the wheel-turning king, wishing to examine the precious elephant, rides on the precious elephant at the time of sunrise, goes around the land as far as the seashore, and, having arrived at the very royal palace, has breakfast.
“Sister, if a wheel-turning king appears in the world, such a precious elephant appears in the world.
“Sister, what is the precious horse that appears in the world when a wheel-turning king appears in the world?
“Sister, here the horse of a wheel-turning king is entirely dark blue, with a black head [F.139.a] and lovely mane and back. It is well proportioned, attractive, and pleasant to behold. When he sees it, his mind filled with joy, the wheel-turning king thinks, ‘Ah, this precious horse is good. I will have it trained quickly.’
“Then the wheel-turning king summons a skillful horse trainer by messenger and orders him, ‘O gentle sir, you should quickly train this precious horse well and then bring it to me.’
“ ‘Certainly, Your Majesty,’ replies the skillful horse trainer to the wheel-turning king, and he trains the precious horse in all kinds of ways for one day. When he trains it in all kinds of ways for just one day, it learns all of it in that very day. Just as other horses learn all kinds of training only after being taught for many years, a great number of years, when the precious horse is trained in all kinds of ways for just one day, it learns all of it in that very day.
“Knowing it to have been well trained, he brings it to the wheel-turning king and says, ‘Your Majesty, the good, precious horse has been trained. May Your Majesty know it is the right time.’ Thereupon the wheel-turning king, wishing to examine the precious horse, rides on the precious horse at the time of sunrise, goes around the land as far as the seashore, and, having arrived at the royal palace, has breakfast.
“Sister, if a wheel-turning king appears in the world, such a precious horse appears in the world.
“Sister, what is the precious jewel that appears in the world when a wheel-turning king appears in the world?
“Sister, here the jewel of a wheel-turning king has eight sides and has its origin in excellent lapis lazuli. It is pure, bright, and clear. In the palace of the wheel-turning king all the functions of a lamp are performed by the light of that jewel. [F.139.b] Then, wishing to examine the precious jewel, the wheel-turning king goes to a park with an army consisting of four divisions, with the precious jewel placed on top of a banner when it is completely dark at night, it is raining slightly, and lightning flashes. The wheel-turning king’s entire army consisting of four divisions, and half a yojana around it, are then illuminated by the light of the jewel.
“Sister, if a wheel-turning king appears in the world, such a precious jewel appears in the world.
“Sister, what is the precious woman that appears in the world when a wheel-turning king appears in the world?
“Sister, here the queen of a wheel-turning king is well proportioned, attractive, and pleasant to behold. Her skin is not excessively white or dark, nor is it colored like the madgura fish.506 She is not excessively tall or short, but well balanced in size, not excessively thin or fat or fleshy, but well proportioned in flesh. Sister, she is warm to the touch when it is cold, cool to the touch when it is hot, and as smooth to the touch as cloth from Kaliṅga. Sister, from every pore of skin on her entire body the perfume of sandalwood issues forth. From her mouth the perfume of the blue blossom of the utpala exudes.”507
While the venerable Ānanda explained as far as the precious woman, the woman finished cooking the barley. She threw herself at the venerable Ānanda’s feet and made an aspiration:508 “O noble one, by this root of merit, may I become the precious woman of a wheel-turning king.”
Thereupon the venerable Ānanda went to the Blessed One, bringing the prepared barley. When he arrived, he offered it to the Blessed One.
The buddhas, blessed ones, ask though they already know. The Buddha, the Blessed One, asked the venerable Ānanda, [F.140.a] “Ānanda, who prepared this barley?”
“O Honored One, the brahmin’s daughter So-and-so did.”
“Yes, I did, O Honored One.”
The venerable Ānanda then told the Blessed One in detail all about the talk he had had with the brahmin’s daughter. When the venerable Ānanda had thus spoken, the Blessed One said to him, “Ānanda, why did you not relate to the girl the praises of the Buddha?”
“O Honored One, I thought, ‘Since the qualities of the Buddha are profound, it is likely that she will not be able to understand them.’ Therefore, I told her the praises of a wheel-turning king.”
“Ānanda, it wasn’t good that you did that. It is likely that if you had related to her the praises of the Buddha, she would have made a resolution to attain complete and supreme awakening without regression. Now, however, Ānanda, this girl will become the precious woman of a wheel-turning king.”
Then there was a loud shout: “The brahmin’s daughter So-and-so prepared barley for the Blessed One. The Blessed One predicted her to become the precious woman of a wheel-turning king!” When they heard this, four hundred ninety-eight girls prepared barley for the four hundred ninety-eight monks. They made an aspiration, too: “May we become her attendants!”
When the Blessed One started to eat the meal of barley, the venerable Ānanda became sad and shed tears, thinking, [F.140.b] “The Blessed One, who has made donations by cutting off his hands, feet, and head during such-and-such lives and has attained the state of knowing everything after three incalculably long eons, is now having a meal of rotten barley!”
Then the Blessed One asked the venerable Ānanda, “Ānanda, why are you not pleased but shedding tears?”
“O Honored One, I thought, ‘The Blessed One, who was born in the family of wheel-turning kings and has abandoned the throne and gone forth, who has given donations by cutting off his hands, feet, head, and so on during such-and-such lives and has attained the state of knowing everything after three incalculably long eons, is now having a meal of rotten barley!’ ”
“Ānanda,” said the Blessed One, “do you want to eat the barley meal from the Tathāgata’s own mouth?”
“Yes, I do, O Blessed One.”
Then the Blessed One spit out the barley meal from his mouth and gave it to the venerable Ānanda. The venerable Ānanda started to eat it. The Blessed One said, “Ānanda, have you ever experienced such a taste?”
“O Honored One, although I have been born in the family of wheel-turning kings and have grown up in the family of wheel-turning kings, I have never experienced such a taste as that of the barley meal spat from the Blessed One’s mouth.”509
“Ānanda, thus the Tathāgata has a clean tongue faculty called possessing the best taste. If the Tathāgata has even an ordinary meal, for him it becomes of a hundred flavors.”510
Then there was a loud shout:511 “Agnidatta, the brahmin king, is staying in a concealed location, having invited the community of monks headed by the Buddha for three months, and the Blessed One is having barley in Vairambhya!” [F.141.a]
Neighboring kings heard this, too.512 They sent messengers to Agnidatta, the brahmin king, but the messengers were not able to enter the gate and stayed at the gate.
When he heard this, Anāthapiṇḍada, the householder, filled five hundred carriages with rice covered with leaves513 and dispatched them.
Then Māra the Evil One thought, “I have tried to torment the śramaṇa Gautama many times, but I have never had an opportunity for success. Here, once and for all, I will defeat him.” Having thought this, he changed into the venerable Ānanda and stood before the five hundred carriages. He asked, “Sirs, where are you going?”
They said, “O noble one Ānanda, Agnidatta, the brahmin king, is staying in a concealed location, having invited the Blessed One together with the community of disciples for three months, and the Blessed One is having barley in Vairambhya. When he heard this, the householder Anāthapiṇḍada then dispatched these five hundred carriages full of rice covered with leaves for the Blessed One.”
“O sirs,” he replied, “gods, nāgas, and yakṣas have faith in the Blessed One. If the Blessed One raises his bowl in the air, the Thirty-Three Gods fill it with divine nectar. Why, then, would the Blessed One eat barley? Go back.”
“O noble one Ānanda, we have already departed,” they said. “How can we go back?”
Māra thought, “I cannot make them go back. I must devise a plan.” He soared up into the air and caused a heavy rain as if chariot axles were pouring down. [F.141.b] It rained until the hubs of the carriages disappeared beneath the water. Consequently, the oxen that had been tied to the carriages came untied and ran away.
Then the Blessed One with the four hundred ninety-eight monks had barley in Vairambhya. The venerables Śāriputra and Maudgalyāyana spent the rainy-season retreat on Mount Triśaṅku and enjoyed divine nectar.
After three months had passed, the caravan leader invited the Blessed One together with the community of disciples to a meal in a park. The Blessed One assented to him by remaining silent. The venerables Śāriputra and Maudgalyāyana, having spent the rainy-season retreat on Mount Triśaṅku, went there, too.514 Thereupon the caravan leader prepared a pure and fine meal during the night … knowing the Blessed One had finished his meal and washed his hands and his bowl, he threw himself at the feet of the Blessed One and made an aspiration: “By this root of merit may I become a wheel-turning king; may my best horse become my crown prince; may these five hundred horses become my five hundred sons; may the girl who was predicted by the Blessed One to become the precious woman become my precious woman; may the four hundred ninety-eight women become her attendants.”
Knowing the caravan leader’s mind with his own mind, the Blessed One said to him, “Caravan leader, you will become a wheel-turning king; your best horse will become your crown prince; the five hundred horses will become your five hundred sons; that girl will become your precious woman; those four hundred ninety-eight women will become her attendants.”515
After three months had passed and the Blessed One had made and patched his robes, [F.142.a] he said to the venerable Ānanda, “Ānanda, go to Agnidatta, the brahmin king. After saluting him, say, ‘Great King, we have stayed in your country for three months. Farewell, we are going.’ ”
“Certainly, O Honored One,” replied the venerable Ānanda to the Blessed One, and he went to the residence of Agnidatta, the brahmin king.
At that time Agnidatta, the brahmin king, was waiting for good luck. The venerable Ānanda said to a doorkeeper, “Sir, go to Agnidatta, the brahmin king. When you arrive, say to him, ‘The monk Ānanda wishes to see Your Majesty and is waiting at the door.’ ”
“Certainly, O noble one,” replied the doorkeeper to the venerable Ānanda, and he went to Agnidatta, the brahmin king. When he arrived, he said to him, “Your Majesty, the monk Ānanda, the noble one, wishes to see Your Majesty and is waiting at the door.”
“My man, I have been waiting for good luck,” said the king. “The monk Ānanda has great power of merit; he himself must be my good luck. He has five excellent points: an excellent name, excellent looks, excellent caste, excellent eloquence, and excellent perfection. Let him enter. Who would block the honorable Ānanda?”
The doorkeeper spoke thus to the venerable Ānanda, and the venerable Ānanda entered. The messengers of the neighboring kings entered with him, too. Thereupon the venerable Ānanda saluted Agnidatta, the brahmin king, and sat down to one side. Having sat down to one side, [F.142.b] the venerable Ānanda said to Agnidatta, the brahmin king, “Great King, the Blessed One salutes you and says, ‘Great King, we have stayed in your country for three months. Farewell, we are going.’ ”
“O noble one Ānanda, I bow to the Buddha, the Blessed One. O noble one Ānanda, has the Blessed One spent the rainy-season retreat in Vairambhya in comfort? Was there by chance any trouble with almsfood?”
The messengers of the neighboring kings said, “Your Majesty, you are no investigator of your own kingdom! Thus, having invited the Blessed One together with the community of disciples for three months, you stayed in a concealed location and the Blessed One had meals of rotten barley for three months!”
“O noble one Ānanda,” said the king, “is it true that the Blessed One had meals of rotten barley for three months?”
“It is true, Great King.”
The King fainted and fell to the ground. Having had much water poured on him, he recovered his senses. He called the ministers and asked them, “Sirs, did I not order you, ‘Prepare various kinds of food abundantly for five hundred people every day’?”
“Your Majesty,” they answered, “although you did order thus, you did not tell us to whom to give the meal. However, the meal is still prepared today.”
Thereupon Agnidatta, the brahmin king, went to the Blessed One. When he arrived, he bowed low until his forehead touched the Blessed One’s feet, and then he sat down to one side. When he had sat down to one side, the Blessed One, through talk consistent with the Dharma, instructed … Agnidatta, the brahmin king. When he had … delighted him…, the Blessed One remained silent. Then Agnidatta, the brahmin king, [F.143.a] threw himself at the feet of the Blessed One and said,516 “O Blessed One, what a fault! O Sugata, what a fault! I was childish, foolish, dull, and ignorant to stay in a concealed location, having invited the Blessed One together with the community of disciples for three months. [B38] O Blessed One, I know my fault, I see my fault. Please have compassion and forgive my fault.”
“Great King, you have admitted your fault as a fault. True, you were childish, foolish, dull, and ignorant to stay in a concealed location, having invited the Tathāgata for three months. Great King, you should know that if you know and see your fault and, having seen it, confess it, your good qualities will not be damaged but only increase. Why, Great King,? You should know that if anyone knows and sees his fault and, having seen it, confesses it and afterward makes a vow,517 his good qualities will not be damaged but only increase.”
Then Agnidatta, the brahmin king, said to the Blessed One, “May the Blessed One together with the community of monks assent to my offer of the requisites for as long as I live: namely, robes, almsfood, bedding and seats, and medicines for the sick.”
“Great King,” said the Blessed One, [F.143.b] “the Tathāgata was born in a time of short lifespans, and there are many things to do for the benefit of people to be trained. And he has come close to the time for nirvāṇa. Therefore, I do not assent.”
“If so, may the Blessed One assent to my offer of the requisites for seven years, seven months, or seven days.”
The Blessed One did not assent to this either. Agnidatta, the brahmin king, said to the Blessed One, “May the Blessed One together with the community of monks assent to my offer of a meal at my house tomorrow.”
Then the Blessed One thought, “It is likely that if I do not assent to having even one meal from him, Agnidatta, the brahmin king, will die, vomiting hot blood.” Thus, the Blessed One assented by remaining silent. Agnidatta, the brahmin king, knowing that the Blessed One had assented by remaining silent, bowed low until his forehead touched the feet of the Blessed One, departed, and went to his residence. When he arrived, he asked the ministers, “Sirs, is there any good means whereby this whole meal could be consumed by the community of monks headed by the Buddha?”
“Your Majesty,” they answered, “if this entire meal is scattered on the ground and trampled underfoot by the monks, it will have been fully consumed.”518
They ordered the laborers, “Sirs, scatter on the ground all the food there is.”
They scattered on the ground everything there was.
Thereupon Agnidatta, the brahmin king, prepared various kinds of pure and fine food during the night . . . . The Blessed One sat on the seat prepared for him in front of the community of monks. At that time a monk who had gone forth in his old age,519 [F.144.a] unable to bear it, thought, “After we have eaten rotten barley for three months, this evil king shows off his riches.” He trampled on the various kinds of foods scattered on the ground.
The brahmins and householders criticized, insulted, and disparaged him: “Noble ones stamp with their feet on various kinds of food, which are meant for the mouth.”
When the monks reported this matter to the Blessed One, the Blessed One thought, “The fault that occurred in this case was that the monks touched with their feet various kinds of food, which are meant for the mouth.”520 He said to the monks, “Monks, since the monk So-and-so, who had gone forth in his old age, unable to bear what had happened, trampled on the various kinds of food scattered on the ground, which were meant for the mouth, the brahmins and householders criticized, insulted, and disparaged him. Therefore, a monk should not trample with his feet various kinds of food, which are meant for the mouth. If he does so, he becomes guilty of an offense.”
Thereupon Agnidatta, the brahmin king, knew that the community of monks headed by the Buddha had sat down in comfort, and with his own hands he served and satisfied them with a pure and fine meal, … knowing the Blessed One had … washed his hands and his bowl, he took a low seat and sat before the Blessed One in order to hear the Dharma. Then the Blessed One, through talk consistent with the Dharma, instructed, inspired, encouraged, and delighted Agnidatta, the brahmin king. The Blessed One, having instructed, inspired, encouraged, and delighted Agnidatta in a variety of ways through talk consistent with the Dharma, [F.144.b] then rose from his seat and departed.
C. Breaking a Hut521
After the three months of the rainy season had passed, many monks, having made and patched their robes, went to the Blessed One. When they arrived, they bowed low until their foreheads touched the Blessed One’s feet, and then they sat down to one side. Having sat down to one side, the many monks said to the Blessed One, “O Honored One, we have stayed in the country of Vairambhya for three months. O Honored One, we will break the huts.”522
“Monks, you should not break the huts. The longer the huts last, the more the donors’ merit increases and the more merit is generated. There are four things that are to be known as the outcomes of merits and virtues and the cause of the happiness of benefactors and donors. What are the four?
“If a virtuous monk who abides in good qualities lives in someone’s monastery, having actualized and perfected with his body immeasurable meditation, the outcomes of merits and virtues and the cause of the happiness of benefactors and donors should be known to be immeasurable for that reason.523
“Just like the monastery, the same applies to robes, almsfood, and bedding and seats.
“The amount of the merits of the benefactors and donors who have these four outcomes of merits and virtues and the cause of happiness cannot be grasped as ‘the merit, the fruit of merit, or the fruit of merit that has matured is this much,’ but rather they can only be measured as a large mass of merits because of the sheer abundance of merit.
“Take, for instance, the place where the five great rivers—namely, the Ganges, Yamunā, [F.145.a] Sarayū, Ajiravatī, and Mahī—descend and converge, where the amount of water cannot be grasped as water, a pot of water, or a hundred, a thousand, or a hundred thousand pots of water, but can only be measured as a great mass of water because of the sheer abundance of water. So, too, the amount of the merits of the benefactors and donors who have these four outcomes of merits and virtues and the cause of happiness cannot be grasped as ‘the merit, the fruit of merit, or the fruit of merit that has matured is this much,’ but they can only be measured as a large mass of merits.
D. A Brahmin Who Abused the Buddha Vipaśyin524
The monks, feeling doubtful, inquired of the Buddha, the Blessed One, the one who severs all doubts, “O Honored One, the Blessed One has satisfied poor people through a multitude of merits by cutting off his hands, feet, head, and so on—he has tormented himself for the sake of beings during three incalculably long eons, and has done all that is to be done. And so what karma did he create that matured to cause him to have coarse barley with the four hundred ninety-eight monks in Vairambhya, while the venerables Śāriputra and Maudgalyāyana had divine nectar?”
“Monks,” The Blessed One replied, “the actions were performed and accumulated by the Tathāgata himself in the past, in other lives, . . . .
“Monks, once, when people’s lifespans were eighty thousand years long, there appeared in the world a teacher named Vipaśyin, who was a tathāgata, an arhat, a perfectly awakened one, perfect in knowledge and conduct, a sugata, world knowing, a supreme tamer of people to be tamed, a teacher of gods and humans, a buddha, and a blessed one. He stayed near a royal capital called Bandhumatī with eight hundred thousand monks who were his attendants.
“At that time in Bandhumatī, the royal capital, a brahmin schoolteacher was teaching brahmanical mantras to five hundred students. He was treated by everyone in the world with honor, looked up to, esteemed, venerated, and paid homage to as a worthy man. After the Perfectly Awakened One Vipaśyin arrived at Bandhumatī, the royal capital, however, none treated him with honor, looked up to him, esteemed him, or venerated him. He became very jealous of the Perfectly Awakened One Vipaśyin and his community of disciples.
“Later, early one morning many monks—those who were undergoing training and those who had completed training—dressed, took their bowls and their robes, and entered Bandhumatī, the royal capital, for alms. Having seen them return with their bowls filled with various kinds of tasty sauce and rice, the brahmin demanded, ‘Hey, monks, let me see what almsfood you have obtained.’
“Since they were of honest character, they showed him the almsfood; being of jealous character, he found it unbearable. He called the young brahmins and said, ‘These shaven-headed śramaṇas are not worthy of eating various kinds of tasty sauce and rice, but of eating rotten barley!’
“They [F.146.a] agreed with him: ‘True, sir! True! These shaven-headed śramaṇas are not worthy of eating various kinds of tasty sauce and rice, but only of eating rotten barley.’
“Among them, there were two young brahmins who were pious and good and had a virtuous disposition. They said, ‘Sir, do not say that. These are great people and worthy of eating divine nectar, not rotten barley.’
“What do you think, monks? That one who criticized the attendants of the Perfectly Awakened One Vipaśyin at that time, on that occasion, was indeed me. Those who were the four hundred ninety-eight young brahmins are indeed these four hundred ninety-eight monks. Those two young brahmins who were pious and good and had a virtuous disposition are indeed these monks Śāriputra and Maudgalyāyana. Because of the maturation of those actions—namely, my speaking harsh words out of malice toward the Perfectly Awakened One Vipaśyin’s disciples who were undergoing training and had completed training, the four hundred ninety-eight young brahmins’ agreeing, and the two others’ disagreeing—the Tathāgata ate rotten barley with the four hundred ninety-eight monks in Vairambhya at that time, while Śāriputra and Maudgalyāyana enjoyed divine nectar.
“Therefore, monks, the maturation of entirely negative actions is entirely negative … you should seek entirely positive actions. Monks, that is how you must train.”
VI. Ayodhyā
A. The Simile of a Log and the Going Forth of Nanda, the Herdsman525
Then the Blessed One, traveling through Southern Pañcāra, arrived in Ayodhyā, and stayed on the bank of the Ganges near Ayodhyā.
Thereupon a monk went to the Blessed One. When he arrived, he bowed low until his forehead touched the Blessed One’s feet, and then he sat down to one side. Having sat down to one side, the monk said to the Blessed One, “O Blessed One, please teach me a condensed Dharma so that after I have listened to the condensed Dharma from the Blessed One, I will come to dwell alone, in solitude, not carelessly but diligently, directing myself toward myself. If I dwell alone, in solitude, not carelessly but diligently, directing myself toward myself,526 I will, in this life, by my own supernormal knowledge, actualize and accomplish the supreme end of the pure life for which the sons of noble families go forth from their homes into homelessness with true faith, having shaved off their hair and beards and donned saffron robes, and understand: ‘My births have been exhausted. The pure life has been lived. What is to be done has been done. I will not know another existence after this one.’ ”527
The Blessed One was gazing at the Ganges, and when he saw a large log being carried along by its current, he asked the monk, “Monk, do you see that large log being carried along by the current of the Ganges?”
“Yes, I do, O Honored One.”
“If it reaches neither this bank, the opposite bank, nor the middle, is neither washed up on the land nor taken by humans or nonhumans, neither sinks in the water nor decays inside, monk, that large log will in due course flow down to the ocean, descend to the ocean, [F.147.a] have descended to the ocean. In this way, monk, if you reach neither this bank, … nor decay inside, monk, you will in due course flow down to nirvāṇa, descend to nirvāṇa, and have descended to nirvāṇa.”
“O Honored One, I do not understand what this bank is, what the opposite bank is, what touching the middle is, what being washed up on the land is, what being taken by humans is, what being taken by nonhumans is, what sinking in the water is, and what decaying inside is. O Blessed One, please teach me a condensed Dharma so that after I have listened to the condensed Dharma from the Blessed One, … ‘I will not know another existence after this one.’ ”
“Monk, this bank is a designation for the six internal sense spheres; the opposite bank is a designation for the six external sense spheres; touching the middle is a designation for desire for pleasure; being washed up on the land is a designation for self-conceit; being taken by humans means that here one lives together with people who have gone forth as well as lay people, shares pleasure and happiness with them, is happy at their happiness, suffers at their suffering, and undertakes and finishes tasks whenever they need to be done; being taken by nonhumans means that here one leads the pure life, having made this aspiration: ‘By this moral conduct, vow, ascetic practice, or pure life, may I become a god or the retainer of a god’; sinking in the water means that here, having abandoned the rules of training, one descends; [F.147.b] decaying inside means that here one is a violator of moral conduct and possessor of evil qualities—one’s inside is rotten and leaking out like decayed wood, one behaves like a sheep or donkey, one falsely claims to be a śramaṇa, and one falsely claims to be leading the pure life.528 Monk, if you thus reach neither this bank, … you will … have descended to nirvāṇa.”
The monk rejoiced in and praised the words of the Blessed One. He bowed low until his forehead touched the Blessed One’s feet, and he departed from the Blessed One’s presence.
Then the monk, instructed by the Blessed One through this teaching called the simile of the large log, dwelt alone, in solitude, not carelessly but diligently, directing himself toward himself. In that life, by his own supernormal knowledge, he actualized and accomplished the supreme end of the pure life for which the sons of noble families go forth from their homes into homelessness with true faith, having shaved off their hair and beards and donned saffron robes. He knew and understood: “My births have been exhausted. The pure life has been lived. What is to be done has been done. I will not know another existence after this one.” That venerable one became an arhat whose mind had been completely liberated.
At that time, near the Blessed One, a herdsman named Nanda stood, leaning on a stick and watching cattle. A frog was squashed by his stick.529 The frog, having had its vital organs cut530 and been split at its joints, gave rise to the thought, “If I move my body or utter a cry, by this cause I will prevent Nanda, the herdsman, from listening to the discourse.” Filled with faith in the Blessed One, it died and was born among the gods attendant on the Four Great Kings. [F.148.a]
Then Nanda, the herdsman, set his stick to one side and went to the Blessed One. When he arrived, he bowed low until his forehead touched the Blessed One’s feet, and then he sat down to one side. Having sat down, Nanda, the herdsman, said to the Blessed One, “O Honored One, I will reach neither this bank, the opposite bank, nor the middle; I will be neither washed up on the land nor taken by humans or nonhumans; and I will neither sink in the water nor decay inside. I wish to go forth and be ordained a monk in the well-taught Dharma and Vinaya. I will lead the pure life in the presence of the Blessed One.”
“O Honored One, I do not need to do that. Why? O Honored One, since the cows are young and the calves are mature, and each of them knows its own cattle shed, each will go to its home. I wish to go forth and be ordained a monk in the well-taught Dharma and Vinaya. I will lead the pure life in the presence of the Blessed One.”
“Nanda, since the cows are young and the calves are mature, and each of them knows its own cattle shed, each will go to its home. But a herdsman who obtains food and clothing from the owners should do this for them.”
Then Nanda, the herdsman, bowed low until his forehead touched the Blessed One’s feet, and he departed from the Blessed One’s presence. Thereupon, he began to run, crying loudly, “Fear! Fear!” On the way, five hundred herdsmen who were his acquaintances saw him and asked, “Fear of what?”531
“Fear of birth; fear of old age;532 fear of death!”
They, too, began to run, following after him. [F.148.b] Seeing them, other herdsmen, shepherds,533 herb gatherers, wood gatherers, people who make a living properly, and people who make a living improperly began to run, following after them. People on the way saw them crying and asked, “Sirs, what’s happening?”
“Fear!” they answered.
“Fear of what?”
“Fear of birth; fear of old age; fear of death!”
Having heard this, they turned back. They came to a hamlet, and then the people living in the hamlet ran hither and thither, frightened to see the many people. Some escaped, some hid their things, some stood in armor. Some brave men approached the people and asked, “Sirs, what’s happening?”
“Fear!” they answered.
“Fear of what?”
“Fear of birth; fear of old age; fear of death!”
Then the inhabitants of the hamlet were relieved.
At that time the venerable Śāriputra was sitting in that very assembly. The venerable Śāriputra then asked the Blessed One, knowing that it had not been a long time since Nanda, the herdsman, had departed,534 “O Honored One, why did the Blessed One let Nanda, the herdsman, who wishes to go forth in the well-taught Dharma and Vinaya, go back home?”
“Śāriputra, it is impossible, out of the question, that Nanda, the herdsman, will dwell at home again as a layman. It is impossible that he will enjoy the objects of desire by hoarding. Now Nanda, the herdsman, will come, having entrusted the cattle to the owners, and will actualize and accomplish the supreme end of the pure life for which the sons of noble families go forth from their homes into homelessness with true faith, having shaved off their hair and beards and donned saffron robes, [F.149.a] and understand: ‘My births have been exhausted. The pure life has been lived. What is to be done has been done. I will not know another existence after this one.’ ”
After that, Nanda, the herdsman, having entrusted the cattle to the owners, did go to the Blessed One, with five hundred people around him. Having arrived, he said to the Blessed One, “O Honored One, I have entrusted the cattle to the owners. O Honored One, I wish to go forth and be ordained a monk in the well-taught Dharma and Vinaya. I will lead the pure life in the presence of the Blessed One.”
In the well-taught Dharma and Vinaya, Nanda, the herdsman, went forth and was ordained a monk with the five hundred people around him. Having gone forth, the Honored One … became an arhat whose mind had been completely liberated.535
It is natural for gods or goddesses to give rise to three thoughts just after birth:536 namely, where they died, where they were reborn, and by what action. The god who had once been the frog observed that he had died in the animal world, that he had been born among the gods attendant on the Four Great Kings, and that this was because he had gained faith in the Blessed One. Then he thought, “Since it would not be appropriate for me to let any days pass before going to see and serve the Blessed One, I will by all means go now to see and serve the Blessed One before any days have passed.”
Then the god who had once been the frog put on untarnished, swinging earrings, … [F.149.b] illuminating the entire neighborhood of the bank of the Ganges with a vast display of light, scattered the flowers for the Blessed One, and sat down in front of the Blessed One in order to hear the Dharma. The Blessed One knew the thinking, proclivity, disposition, and nature of the god who had once been the frog and preached the Dharma that was appropriate for the god and that caused him to penetrate the four truths of the noble ones. When the god had heard the Dharma,537 with the vajra of knowledge he leveled the twenty high peaks of the mountain chain of the false view of individuality that had been accumulated since beginningless time, and actualized the fruit of stream-entry. . . . “…O Honored One, I have been exalted, truly exalted. Since I seek refuge in the Blessed One, the Dharma, and the community of monks, please accept me as a lay brother. From today onward, I embrace my faith as one who seeks refuge throughout my life.”538
Thereupon, like a merchant who had obtained merchandise, like a farmer who had gotten a bumper crop, like a warrior who had won a battle, like a patient who had been cured of every disease, the god who had once been the frog went to his house with the same majesty with which he had come into the presence of the Blessed One.
As the monks were exerting themselves in the maintenance of vigilance during the first and last watches of the night, when they saw the vast display of light appear before the Blessed One, they were perplexed and asked the Blessed One, “What was that? O Blessed One, did Brahmā, the ruler of the Sahā World, or Śakra, Lord of the Gods, or the Four Protectors of the World come to see the Blessed One last night?”
“Monks, it was not Brahmā, the ruler of the Sahā World, [F.150.a] or Śakra, Lord of the Gods, or the Four Protectors of the World who came to see me. A frog, while he was squashed by the stick of Nanda, the herdsman, having had his vital organs cut, and been split at his joints, did not move or utter a cry, thinking that if he did so, he would prevent Nanda, the herdsman, from listening to the discourse. His mind filled with faith in me, he died and was born among the gods attendant on the Four Great Kings. He came to see me last night, saw the truths when I preached Dharma to him, and went to his house.”
B. The Former Lives of Nanda and the Frog
The monks, feeling doubtful, inquired of the Buddha, the Blessed One, the one who severs all doubts, “O Honored One, what karma did Nanda, the herdsman, and the five hundred people around him create that matured to cause them to be born among herdsmen, go forth in the teachings of the Blessed One, abandon all the defilements, and actualize the state of an arhat? What karma did the god who had once been a frog create that matured to cause him to be born among frogs and then see the truths?”
“Monks, once, in this fortunate eon, when people’s lives were twenty thousand years long, there appeared in the world a teacher named Kāśyapa, . . . . He stayed in the Ṛṣivadana Deer Park near the city of Vārāṇasī.
“In the teachings of that buddha, this Nanda, the herdsman, went forth and became a preacher of Dharma well versed in the three divisions of the canon, of eloquence tied to reason and free from obstacles,541 possessing five hundred attendants, and skillful in dealing with disputes. Every time a dispute arose in the community, he settled it. But there were two haughty, proud monks who had never gone to him. Later, a dispute arose between these two; [F.150.b] because of this matter, they went to him, paid homage at his feet, and requested, ‘Since such-and-such a dispute has arisen between the two of us, please settle it.’
“He thought, ‘If I settle their dispute today, then these two will no longer depend on me, and so they will not come to me afterward.’ He gathered the entire community and raised the dispute in the middle of the community, but he did not issue any decision. The next day he went to a certain hamlet, for he had some business there. Then the two monks themselves raised the dispute in the middle of the community lest the settlement of it be delayed, and it was settled by the community. The monk well versed in the three divisions of the canon returned from the hamlet. After he had rested well from the journey, he asked his co-resident monks and pupils, ‘Did the two, the disputer and his opponent, not come?’
“ ‘O master, the dispute has been settled,’ they answered.
“ ‘Who settled it?’
“ ‘The community did.’
“ ‘How did they do it?’
“When they had explained the matter in detail, he created the karma of harsh speech: ‘The venerable ones are ignorant: they settled that dispute just as herdsmen do!’
“They, too, agreed with him: ‘True, O master! They settled the dispute just as herdsmen do.’
“What do you think, monks? That one who was the monk well versed in the three divisions of the canon at that time, on that occasion, was indeed this herdsman Nanda. Those who were his five hundred co-resident monks and pupils are indeed these five hundred herdsmen. Because of the maturation of the karma created by them, namely, his saying the word ‘herdsmen’ to the community of disciples of the Perfectly Awakened One Kāśyapa, and the agreeing of his co-resident monks and pupils, he and the five hundred attendants were born among herdsmen for five hundred lives. [F.151.a] And since he was well versed in the aggregates, elements, sense spheres, dependent origination, and what is proper and what is improper through recitation and repetition, he with the five hundred people around him went forth in my teaching, abandoned all the defilements, and actualized the state of an arhat.
“Monks,542 furthermore, the god who had once been a frog was a meditator monk in the teachings of the Perfectly Awakened One Kāśyapa. One time, he traveled to a monastery near a hamlet. In the first watch of the night, he sat down with his legs crossed and began to practice concentration of the mind. At that time reciter monks were reciting. Since dhyāna is disturbed by voices, he was unable to concentrate his mind on a single point due to the voices. He thought, ‘Let them recite. I will meditate in the middle watch.’ When he got up in the middle watch and sat down, other monks were reciting. He thought, ‘I will meditate in the last watch.’ When he got up in the last watch and sat down, other monks were reciting. Since he was not free from desire, he said in fierce anger, ‘These śramaṇas of Kāśyapa were noisy as frogs all night long!’
“What do you think, monks? That one who was the meditator monk at that time, on that occasion, was indeed this god who had once been a frog. Because of the maturation of the karma created by him, namely, his saying the word ‘frogs’ to the disciples of the Perfectly Awakened One Kāśyapa, he was born among frogs for five hundred lives, and now he was still born among frogs. Because he had gained faith, he was reborn among the gods attendant on the Four Great Kings. [F.151.b] Because he led the pure life in the presence of the Perfectly Awakened One Kāśyapa, here he saw the truths.
“Therefore, monks, the maturation of entirely negative actions is entirely negative … you should seek . . . . Monks, that is how you must train.” Thus spoke the Blessed One.
VII. The Ganges
A. Haṃsas, Fish, and Turtles
Thereupon the Blessed One crossed the Ganges. There five hundred haṃsas, fish, and turtles surrounded and circumambulated him. The Blessed One preached the Dharma to them that consists of three phrases: “Sirs, all conditioned things are impermanent; all phenomena are selfless; and nirvāṇa is peace. Make your mind filled with faith in me, and by all means become free from desire for rebirth in the animal world.”
“It would not be appropriate for us to eat food in front of the Blessed One after having heard the Dharma that consists of three phrases,” they thought, and so they fasted. Since those who are born in the animal world have great digestive fire, they died. After they died, they were reborn among the gods attendant on the Four Great Kings.
It is natural for gods or goddesses to give rise to three thoughts just after birth: namely, where they died, where they were reborn, and by what action. They observed that they had died in the animal world, that they had been born among the gods attendant on the Four Great Kings, … filled the front part of their garments with … mandārava flowers, illuminated the vicinity of the Blessed One with a display of light, scattered the flowers for the Blessed One, and sat down surrounding the Blessed One. The Blessed One knew their thinking, proclivity, [F.152.a] disposition, and nature and preached the Dharma that was appropriate for them and that caused them to penetrate the four truths of the noble ones. With the vajra of knowledge they leveled the twenty high peaks of the mountain chain of the false view of individuality that had been accumulated since beginningless time, and actualized the fruit of stream-entry. After having seen the truths, they spoke an inspired utterance three times: “O Honored One,543 what the Blessed One has done for us is what has never been done for us by our fathers, our mothers, our kinsmen and relatives, our wives, a king, gods, our ancestral spirits, śramaṇas, or brahmins. You have pulled us out from the states of hell and hungry ghosts, placed us among the gods and humans, caused us to leave the course of rebirth far behind, dried up the ocean of blood and tears, liberated us from the mountain of bones, shut the gate to inferior states of existence, and opened the gate to heaven and liberation. With the vajra of knowledge we have leveled the twenty high peaks of the mountain chain of the false view of individuality that had been accumulated since beginningless time, and actualized the fruit of stream-entry. O Honored One, we have been exalted, truly exalted. Since we seek refuge in the Blessed One, the Dharma, and the community of monks, please accept us as lay brothers. From today onward, we embrace our faith as ones who seek refuge throughout our life.”
B. The Former Lives of the Haṃsas, Fish, and Turtles
The monks, feeling doubtful, inquired of [F.152.b] the Buddha, the Blessed One, the one who severs all doubts, “O Honored One, what karma did the fish, haṃsas, and turtles create that matured to cause them to be born among haṃsas, fish, and turtles? What karma did they create that matured to cause them to be born among gods and to see the truths?”
“Monks,” the Blessed One replied, “the actions were performed and accumulated by these sons of gods who had once been haṃsas, fish, and turtles themselves, accruing a heap of karma. . . .
“Monks, once, in this fortunate eon, when people’s lifespans were twenty thousand years long, there appeared in the world a teacher named Kāśyapa, . . . . He stayed in Ṛṣivadana Deer Park near the city of Vārāṇasī. In his teaching these gods went forth. There these monks transgressed the minor rules of training; that karma matured to cause them to be reborn among fish, haṃsas, and turtles. Because they had gained faith in me, they were reborn among the gods. Because they led the pure life in the presence of the Perfectly Awakened One Kāśyapa, they saw the truths. Therefore, monks, the maturation of entirely negative actions is entirely negative … you should seek . . . . Monks, that is how you must train.”
VIII. Hungry Ghosts
A. The Conversation with the Five Hundred Hungry Ghosts
After the Blessed One had crossed the Ganges, he was surrounded by five hundred hungry ghosts who were just like burnt logs or raised skeletons, covered with hair, whose bellies were just like mountains, whose mouths were just like pinholes, who were burning, thoroughly burning, thoroughly and entirely burning, blazing as a single flame. They made the gesture of supplication and said to the Blessed One, “O Honored One, we hungry ghosts [F.153.a] have inferior bodies and are unable to obtain even water because of our sinful past actions,544 not to mention food. You are of great compassion; please give us water.”
The hungry ghosts said:
Thereupon the Blessed One instructed the venerable Mahāmaudgalyāyana, “Maudgalyāyana,547 pour water on548 the hungry ghosts.”
“Certainly, O Honored One,” replied the venerable Mahāmaudgalyāyana, and he started to pour water on the hungry ghosts, but he was unable to expand the hungry ghosts’ mouths, which were as small as pinholes.549 The Blessed One then expanded their mouths using his magical power, and the venerable Mahāmaudgalyāyana poured water in. Suffering from thirst, they drank so much that their bellies swelled. Then they died, having harbored such pure minds for the Blessed One … after having seen the truths, they left for their own residences. [F.153.b]
B. The Previous Lives of the Five Hundred Hungry Ghosts
The monks, feeling doubtful, inquired of the Buddha, the Blessed One, the one who severs all doubts, “O Honored One, what karma did these hungry ghosts create that matured to cause them to be born among hungry ghosts? What karma did they create that matured to cause them to be born among gods and see the truths?”
The Blessed One said, “Monks, the actions were performed and accumulated by themselves, accruing a heap of karma. . . . .
“Monks, once, in this fortunate eon, when people’s lifespans were twenty thousand years long, there appeared in the world a teacher named Kāśyapa . . . . He stayed in the Ṛṣivadana Deer Park near the city of Vārāṇasī.
“His disciples used to beg for alms out of faith550 and served the Buddha, Dharma, and Saṅgha. When the Perfectly Awakened One Kāśyapa’s teaching was not extensive, there were few monks who asked for alms out of faith.551 When it became extensive, there were many such monks. At that time, when five hundred lay brothers were meeting together in an assembly hall for some business, many monks asking for alms out of faith went to them, wishing to receive alms. The lay brothers, in fierce anger, created the karma of harsh speech: ‘These śramaṇas of Kāśyapa always hold out their hands as if they have been born as hungry ghosts.’
“What do you think, monks? Those five hundred lay brothers were indeed these five hundred hungry ghosts. Because of the maturation of the karma—namely, their saying the words ‘hungry ghosts’ to the disciples of the Perfectly Awakened One Kāśyapa—they were born among hungry ghosts for five hundred lives, [F.154.a] and now they were also born among hungry ghosts. Because they had gained faith in me, they were reborn among the gods. Because they sought refuge in the Perfectly Awakened One Kāśyapa and accepted the rules of training, they saw the truths.
“Therefore, monks, the maturation of entirely negative actions is entirely negative … you should seek . . . . Monks, that is how you must train.” Thus spoke the Blessed One.
IX. Velāma552
After the Blessed One had crossed the Ganges, he looked back at the river, turning to the right just as an elephant does. The monks asked the Blessed One, “O Honored One, on account of what did the Blessed One look back at the Ganges, turning to the right?”
“O Honored One, now it is the right time. O Sugata, now it is the right time. If the Blessed One explains the origin of the Ganges, the monks will listen to it.” [B39]
“Monks, once there appeared a righteous Dharma king named Piṇḍavaṃśa. In accordance with the Dharma, he ruled over the country, which was rich, prosperous, peaceful, abundant in food, and full of many people, where trees were always full of blossoms and fruits, and the gods brought rain at the appropriate times so that the fields produced rich crops. There was no fighting, combat, dispute, strife, robbers, famine, or illness there, and the people were always absorbed in the Dharma.
“When spring came, the king, surrounded by his consorts, went to a park in a forest where the trees were budding and birds such as haṃsas, cranes, peacocks, parrots, [F.154.b] hill mynas, cuckoos, and jīvaṃjīvakas were singing.
“At that time, he saw a man hobbling about on a cane, taking slow steps. His body was full of wrinkles, his head was gray, his limbs were weak, his faculties were frail, his flesh was wizened, and his energy was feeble. The king asked his ministers, ‘Sirs, what is this man hobbling about on a cane, whose body is full of wrinkles, whose head is gray…?’
“ ‘Your Majesty,” they answered, “he is said to be an old, aged man because of the loss of his conditioning factors.’
“ ‘Sirs, will such a thing happen to me, too?’ asked the king.
“ ‘Your Majesty, this is common to everyone,’ the ministers answered.
“The king departed, feeling melancholy. Then he saw a pale man with his body in bandages, limping about on a cane with much sighing. His body was covered with cuts and sores, his belly was concave like a valley,553 and his major limbs and minor appendages were covered with wounds that oozed pus.554 Having seen him, the king again asked his ministers, ‘Sirs, what is this pale man limping about on a cane…?’
“ ‘Your Majesty,’ they answered, “he is called one afflicted with illness.’
“ ‘Sirs, will such a thing happen to me, too?’ asked the king.
“ ‘Your Majesty,’ the ministers answered, ‘this is common to everyone. As a result of faults that they committed in the past, this happens to people who have performed sinful acts.’
“The king departed, thinking, ‘One should not perform evil acts by any means.’ Then he saw a bier decorated with blue, yellow, red, and white cloth, surrounded by parasols, banners, flags, [F.155.a] conch shells, paṭaha drums, men, women, boys, and girls. It was shouldered by four men, preceded by a person carrying a fire, followed by a man carrying firewood, and people crying everywhere, ‘Alas! Father!’ ‘Alas! Son!’ ‘Alas! Brother!’ ‘Alas! Husband!’555 When he saw this, he again asked his ministers, ‘Sirs, what is this bier decorated with blue, yellow, red, and white cloth … and people crying?’
“ ‘Your Majesty,’ the ministers answered, ‘this is called a dead man.’
“ ‘Sirs, will such a thing happen to me, too?’ asked the king.
“ ‘Your Majesty, this is common to everyone,’ they answered.
“Having seen the old man, the sick man, and the dead man, the king felt melancholy. He went home and stayed in the lamentation room,556 thinking, ‘I will no longer be able to take pleasure in my present enjoyments.’
“In his land, there was a brahmin named Velāma,557 who was rich and had great wealth and many possessions. He heard that the king felt melancholy and was staying in the lamentation room, having seen an old man, a sick man, and a dead man. Upon hearing this, he went to King Piṇḍavaṃśa, riding an entirely white chariot pulled by mares, carrying a golden water jar with a handle, and surrounded by hundreds of thousands of brahmins. When he arrived, the ministers said to the king, ‘Your Majesty, Brahmin Velāma is standing at the door.’
“The king then left the room and sat in the treasury.558 After wishing the king victory and long life, and having sat down, Brahmin Velāma asked, ‘Your Majesty, why are you staying in the lamentation room?’
“The king told the brahmin Velāma in detail all about what had happened. The brahmin said, ‘Your Majesty, since beings in this world experience the fruit of their karma, [F.155.b] you do not need to lament about this. There are beings that create good karma, that create evil karma, and that create both. Wheel-turning kings always create good karma and, after their death, are reborn among the gods. Your Majesty is a wheel-turning king, too; you will experience divine happiness after experiencing the best human happiness. Nonetheless, Your Majesty, you should exert yourself in making offerings, which is the staircase to heaven.’
“The king ordered his ministers, ‘Sirs, proclaim this throughout the country with the ringing of bells: “The king will make a limitless offering; you should come and enjoy it.” ’
“The king then had an offering hall built and gave food to those who sought food, and drink to those who sought drink.
“There a pit was dug to pour the water used for boiling rice (ācāma). Since the hot water became cold when it was poured there, the pit was named Anavatapta, ‘unheated.’ After twelve years, the water used for boiling rice and the water used for washing rice flowed out as a river through a valley, and the river was named Ācāma River.”559
Abbreviations
AA | Aṅguttaranikāya-Aṭṭhakathā. Edited by Walleser and Kopp (1924–56). |
---|---|
AG | Anavataptagāthā. |
AKBh | Abhidharmakośabhāṣya. Edited by Pradhan = Pradhan 1967. |
AKUp | Abhidharmakośopāyikā-ṭīkā. (Section numbers are based on Honjō 1984 and 2014.) |
AN | Aṅguttaranikāya = Morris et al. 1885–1961. |
AdhvG | Adhikaraṇavastu. Edited by Gnoli (1978). |
Ap | Apadāna = Lilley 2000. |
BAK | Bodhisattvāvadānakalpalatā = Chandra Das and Vidyābhūshana 1940. |
BHSD | Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit Grammar and Dictionary. Vol. II Dictionary = Edgerton 1953. |
Bhv | Bhaiṣajyavastu. |
BhvY | Bhaiṣajyavastu. Japanese translation by Yao = Yao 2013a. |
CPD | The Critical Pāli Dictionary = Trenckner et al. 1924–92. |
Ch. | Chinese translation. |
ChDas | Tibetan English Dictionary = Das 1902. |
Crv | Carmavastu. |
Cīv | Cīvaravastu. |
D | Degé xylograph (scanned and published by the Buddhist Digital Resource Center). |
DA | Dīghanikāya-Aṭṭhakathā = Rhys Davids et al. 1968–71. |
DN | Dīghanikāya = Rhys Davids and Carpenter 1890–1911. |
DPPN | Dictionary of Pāli Proper Names = Malalasekera 1937. |
DhpA | Dhammapadatthakathā = Norman 1906. |
Divy | Divyāvadāna = Cowell and Neil [1886] 1987. |
DĀ | Dīrghāgama. |
DĀ 35 | Ambāṣṭhasūtra. Edited by Melzer (2010a). |
DĀc | Dīrghāgama. Chinese translation (Taishō no. 1 Chang ahan jing 長阿含經). |
EĀc | Ekottarikāgama Chinese translation (Taishō no. 125 Zengyi ahan jing 増壹阿含經). |
GBhv | The Bhaiṣajyavastu in the Gilgit manuscript = GMNAI i, 46–134. |
GM | Gilgit manuscripts of the Vinayavastu edited by Dutt = Dutt 1942–50 (page numbers of Bhv, which is in part i, is referred to just with “GM,” and those of other vastus with “GM ii, iii, and iv,” with part numbers). |
GMNAI i | Gilgit Manuscripts in the National Archives of India: Facsimile Edition vol. 1, Vinaya Texts = Clarke 2014. |
H | Hemis manuscript. |
J | Jātaka = Fausbøll [1877–96] 1962–64. |
Jäschke | Tibetan English Dictionary = Jäschke 1881. |
KA | Kaṭhināvadāna = Degener 1990. |
Kṣv | Kṣudrakavastu. |
MN | Majjhimanikāya = Trenckner et al. [1888–1925] 1974–79. |
MPS | Mahāparinirvāṇa-sūtra = Waldschmidt 1950–51. |
MSA | Mahāsudarśanāvadāna in the Gilgit manuscripts. |
MSV | Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya. |
MW | A Sanskrit-English Dictionary = Monier-Williams 1899. |
MdhA | Māndhātāvadāna in the Gilgit manuscripts. |
Merv-av | Avadāna anthology from Merv = Karashima and Vorobyova-Desyatovskaya 2015. |
Mma | Mahāmantrānusāriṇī-sūtra = Skilling 1994–97, 608–22. |
Mmvr | Mahāmāyūrīvidyārajñī = Takubo 1972. |
Mv | Mahāvastu = Senart 1882–97. |
Mvy | Mahāvyutpatti = Sakaki 1916. |
MĀc | Madhyamāgama Chinese translation (Taishō no. 26 Zhong ahan jing 中阿含經). |
N | Narthang xylograph. |
NBhv | The newly identified Bhaiṣajyavastu fragments held in a private collection, Virginia, and the Schøyen Collection. |
Negi | Tibetan–Sanskrit Dictionary = Negi 1993–2005. |
P | Peking xylograph. |
PLv | Pāṇḍulohitakavastu. |
PTSD | PTS’s Pāli–English Dictionary = Rhys Davids and Stede 1921–25. |
Ph | phug brag manuscript. |
Prjv | Pravrajyāvastu. Translation in Miller 2018. |
PrjvVW | Pravrajyāvastu edited by Vogel and Wille. I: Vogel and Wille 1984; II: 1992; III: 1996; IV: 2002 (all these files are now available in one pdf file online, Vogel and Wille 2014). |
R | Ragya printed Kangyur. |
S | Stok Palace Manuscript. |
SHT | Sanskrithandschriften aus den Turfanfunden. |
SN | Saṃyuttanikāya = Feer [1884–98] 1975–2006. |
SWTF | Sanskrit-Wörterbuch der buddhistischen Texte aus den Turfan-Funden = Waldschmidt et al. 1973–2018. |
Sbhv | Saṅghabhedavastu. |
SbhvG | Saṅghabhedavastu. edited by Gnoli (1977–78). |
Sh | Shey Palace manuscript. |
Skt. | Sanskrit. |
Sn | Suttanipāta = Andersen and Smith [1913] 1984. |
Sumav | Sumāgadhāvadāna = Iwamoto 1979. |
SĀc | Saṃyuktāgama Chinese translation (Taishō no. 99 Za ahan jing 雜阿含經). |
SĀc2 | Saṃyuktāgama Chinese translation (Taishō no. 100 Bieyi za ahan jing 別譯雜阿含經). |
SĀc3 | Saṃyuktāgama Chinese translation (Taishō no. 101 Za ahan jing 雜阿含經). |
T | Tokyo manuscript. |
Taishō | Taishō shinshū daizōkyō 大正新脩大藏經. 100 vols. Tokyo: Taishō Issaikyō Kankōkai 大正一切經刊行會, 1924–34. |
TheraG | Theragāthā = Oldenberg and Pischel 1883. |
Tib. | Tibetan translation. |
U | Urga printed Kangyur . |
Ud | Udāna = Steinthal 1982. |
Ug | Uttaragrantha. |
Uv | Udānavarga = Bernhard 1965–68, i. |
UvTib | Udānavarga in Tibetan translation = Champa Thupten Zongtse 1990. |
VS | Vinayasūtra transliterated by Study Group of Sanskrit Manuscripts in Tibetan dBu med Script. |
Vin | Vinayapiṭaka in Pāli = Oldenberg [1879–83] 1982–1997. |
Viś I | The first story of Viśvantara in the Bhv. |
Viś II | The second story of Viśvantara in the Bhv. |
Viś III | The story of Viśvantara in the Sbhv. |
Viś IV | Viśvantarāvadāna in the Gilgit manuscripts. |
Vvbh | Vinayavibhaṅga. |
ms | Manuscript. |
Śav | Śayanāsanavastu. |
ŚavG | Śayanāsanavastu. Edited by Gnoli (1978). |
Bibliography
ched du brjod pa’i tshoms (Udānavarga). Toh 326, Degé Kangyur vol. 72 (mdo sde, sa), folios 209.a–253.a. English translation in Champa Thupten Zongtse (1990).
sman gyi gzhi (Bhaiṣajyavastu). Toh 1, ch. 6, Degé Kangyur vol. 1 (’dul ba, ka), folios 277.b–311.a; vol. 2 (’dul ba, kha), folios 1.a–317.a; and vol. 3 (’dul ba, ga), folios 1.a–50.a.
sman gyi gzhi. bka’ ’gyur (dpe bsdur ma) [Comparative Edition of the Kangyur], krung go’i bod rig pa zhib ’jug ste gnas kyi bka’ bstan dpe sdur khang (The Tibetan Tripitaka Collation Bureau of the China Tibetology Research Center). 108 volumes. Beijing: krung go’i bod rig pa dpe skrun khang (China Tibetology Publishing House), 2006–2009, vol. 1, pp. 644–721, vol. 2, pp. 3–745, vol. 3, pp. 3–117.
man gyi gzhi (Bhaiṣajyavastu). Stok no. 1, ch. 6, Stok Palace Kangyur vol. 1 (’dul ba, ka), folios 396.b–455.a; vol. 2 (’dul ba, kha), folios 1.a–444.a; and vol. 3 (’dul ba, ga), folios 1.b–56.b.
Bhaiṣajyavastu in the Gilgit manuscripts. Dutt 1942–50, pt. 1 (1947).
Genben shuoyiqieyoubu pinaiye yaoshi 根本説一切有部毘奈耶藥事, Taishō no. 1448, 24.1a1–97a24.
1. A Work Referred to in the Bhaiṣajyavastu
yang dag par ldan pa’i lung (Saṃyuktāgama). Not included in the Kangyur. Cf. Za ahan jing 雜阿含經, Taishō no. 99, 2.1a1–373b18.
2. Works Related to the Bhaiṣajyavastu
’dul ba gzhi (Vinayavastu). Toh 1, 17 chaps. Degé Kangyur vol. 1 (’dul ba, ka), folios 1.a1–311.a; vol. 2 (’dul ba, kha), folios 1.a–317.a; vol. 3 (’dul ba, ga), folios 1.a–293.a; and vol. 4 (’dul ba, nga), folios 1.a–302.a5.
’dul ba rnam par ’byed pa (Vinayavibhaṅga). Toh 3, Degé Kangyur vol. 5 (’dul ba, ca), folios 21.a1–292.a; vol. 6 (’dul ba, cha) folios 1.a–287.a; vol. 7 (’dul ba, ja) folios 1.a–287.a; and vol. 8 (’dul ba, nya) folios 1.a–269.a6.
’dul ba phran tshegs kyi gzhi (Vinayakṣudrakavastu). Toh 6, Degé Kangyur vol. 10 (’dul ba, tha), folios 1.a1–310.a; vol. 11 (’dul ba, da), folios 1.a–333.a7.
’dul ba gzhung bla ma (Vinayottaragrantha). Toh 7, Degé Kangyur vol. 12 (’dul ba, na), folios 1.a1–302.a; vol. 13 (’dul ba, pa) 1.a–313.a5.
ko lpags kyi gzhi (Carmavastu). Toh 1-5, Degé Kangyur vol. 1 (’dul ba, ka), folios 251.a–277.b.
dge slong ma’i ’dul ba rnam par ’byed pa (Bhikṣuṇīvinayavibhaṅga). Toh 5, Degé Kangyur vol. 9 (’dul ba, ta), folios 25.b–328.a.
dge ’dun gyi dbyen gyi gzhi (Saṅghabhedavastu). Toh 1, ch. 17, Degé Kangyur vol. 3 (’dul ba, ga), folios 255.b–293.a; vol. 4 (’dul ba, nga), folios 1.a–302.a.
gos kyi gzhi (Cīvaravastu). Toh 1-7, Degé Kangyur vol. 3 (’dul ba, ga), folios 50.a–115.b.
rgya cher rol pa (Lalitavistara). Toh 95, Degé Kangyur vol. 46 (mdo sde, kha), folios 1.b–216.b. English translation in the Dharmachakra Translation Committee (2013).
’dul ba gzhung dam pa (Vinayottaragrantha). Toh 7a, Degé Kangyur vol. 12 (’dul ba, na), folios 92.b–302.a; vol. 13 (’dul ba, pa), folios 1.b–313.a.
’dul ba’i mdo (Vinayasūtra). Toh 4117, Degé Tengyur vol. 261 (’dul ba, wu) folios 1.a1–100.a7.
don rnam par nges pa chos kyi rnam grangs (Arthaviniścayadharmaparyāya). Toh 317, Degé Kangyur vol. 72 (mdo sde, sa), folios 170.b–188.a. English translation in Dharmachakra Translation Committee 2021.
gnas lam gyi gzhi (Śayanāsanavastu). Toh 1-15, Degé Kangyur vol. 3 (’dul ba, ga), folios 187.a–222.a.
bye brag tu rtogs par byed pa chen po (Mahāvyutpatti). Toh 4346, Degé Tengyur vol. 204 (sna tshogs, co), folios 1.b–131.a.
ma ga d+hA bzang mo’i rtogs pa brjod pa (Sumāgadhāvadāna). Toh 346, vol. 75 (mdo sde, aM), folios 291.b–298.a. English translation The Exemplary Tale of Sumāgadhā 2024.
dmar ser can gyi gzhi (Pāṇḍulohitakavastu). Toh 1-11, Degé Kangyur vol. 3 (’dul ba, ga), folios 140.a–165.b.
rtsod pa’i gzhi (Adhikaraṇavastu). Toh 1-16, Degé Kangyur vol. 3 (’dul ba, ga), folios 222.a–255.b.
mdzangs blun zhes bya ba’i mdo (Damamūkasūtra). Toh 341, vol. 74 (mdo sde, a), folios 129.a–298.a.
gzhang ’brum rab tu zhi bar byed pa’i mdo (Arśapraśamanasūtra). Toh 621, Degé Kangyur vol. 91 (rgyud, ba), folios 61.a–61.b; Toh 1020, vol. 101 (gzungs, waM), folios 181.b–183.a.
yangs pa’i grong khyer du ’jug pa’i mdo chen po (Vaiśālīpraveśamahāsūtra). Toh 312, Degé Kangyur vol. 72 (mdo sde, sa) folios 157.b–161.b. English translation in the Bhaiṣajyavastu Translation Team (2020).
yongs su mya ngan las ’das pa chen po’i mdo. Toh 119, Degé Kangyur vol. 52 (mdo sde, nya), folios 1.b–343.a; vol. 53 (mdo sde, ta), folios 1.b–339.a.
rab tu ’byung ba’ gzhi (Pravrjyāvastu). Toh 1, chap. 1. Degé Kangyur vol. 1 (’dul ba, ka), folios 1.a–131.a. English translation in Miller (2018).
rig sngags kyi rgyal mo rma bya chen mo (Mahāmāyūrīvidyārājñi). Toh 559, Degé Kangyur, vol. 90 (rgyud ’bum, pha), folios 87.b–117.a. English translation in Dharmachakra Translation Committee 2023.
las brgya pa (Karmaśataka). Toh 340, Degé Kangyur vol. 73 (mdo sde, ha), folios 1.b–309.a; vol. 74 (mdo sde, a), folios 1.b–128.b. English translation in Jamspal and Fischer 2020.
gsang sngags kyi rjes su ’brang ba chen mo’i sgrub thabs (Mahāmantrānusāriṇīsādhana). Toh 3254, Degé Tengyur vol. 76 (rgyud, bu), folio 15.b.
so sor thar pa’i mdo (Prātimokṣasūtra). Toh 2, Degé Kangyur vol. 5 (’dul ba, ca), folios 1.a–20.b.
Kalyāṇamitra. lung phran tshegs kyi rnam par bshad pa (Āgamakṣudrakavyākhyāna). Toh 4115, Degé Tengyur vol. 158 (’dul ba, dzu), folios 1.b–232.a.
Śamathadeva. chos mngon pa’i mdzod kyi ’grel bshad nye bar mkho ba (Abhidharmakośaṭīkopāyikā). Toh 4094, Degé Tengyur vol. 146 (mngon pa, ja), folios 1.b–287.a; vol 147 (mngon pa, ngu), folios 1.b–95.a.
Vasubandhu. chos mngon pa’i mdzod kyi bshad pa (Abhidharmakośabhāṣya). Toh 4090, Degé Tengyur vol. 140 (mngon pa, ku), folios 26.b–258.a; vol. 141 (mngon pa, khu), folios 1.b–95.a.
———. rnam par bshad pa’i rigs pa (Vyākhyāyukti). Toh 4061, Degé Tengyur vol. 136 (sems tsam, shi), folios 29.a–134.b.
Yaśomitra. chos mngon pa’i mdzod kyi ’grel bshad (Abhidharmakośaṭīkā). Toh 4092, Degé Tengyur vol. 142 (mngon pa, gu), folios 1.b–330.a; vol. 143 (mngon pa, ngu), folios 1.b–333.a.
3. Works Referred to in the Introduction, Notes, etc.
Akanuma, Chizen 赤沼 智善. Indo bukkyō koyū meishi jiten 印度佛教固有名詞辭典 [“A dictionary of proper names of Indian Buddhism”]. Nagoya: Hajinkaku shobō, 1931. Reprint, Kyoto: Hōzōkan 法藏館, 1967.
Anālayo (2007). “Mindfulness of Breathing in the Saṃyukta-āgama.” Buddhist Studies Review 24, no.2: 137–50. Reprint, 2015: 333–45.
———(2008). “Rebirth and the Gandhabba.” Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University Journal of Buddhist Studies 1: 91–105.
———(2010). The Genesis of the Bodhisattva Ideal. Hamburg: Hamburg University Press.
———(2011a). A Comparative Study of the Majjhima-nikāya. 2 vols., Taipei: Dharma Drum Publishing Corporation.
———(2011b). “The conversion of the Brahmin Sela in the Ekottarika-āgama.” Thai International Journal of Buddhist Studies 2: 37–56. Reprint, 2016b: 325–43.
———(2011c). “Vakkali’s Suicide in the Chinese Āgamas.” Buddhist Studies Review 28, no. 2: 155–70. Reprint, 2015: 235–56.
———(2012a). Madhyama-āgama Studies. Taipei: Dharma Drum Publishing Corporation.
———(2012b). “Protecting Oneself and Others Through Mindfulness: The Acrobat Simile in the Saṃyukta-āgama.” Sri Lanka International Journal of Buddhist Studies 2: 1–23. Reprint, 2015: 311–32.
———(2014a). “Karma and Female Birth.” Journal of Buddhist Ethics 21: 107–51. Reprint, 2016b: 381–411.
———(2014b). “Maitreya and the Wheel-turning King.” Asian Literature and Translation. Reprint, 2017: 349–91.
———(2015). Saṃyukta-āgama Studies. Taipei: Dharma Drum Publishing Corporation.
———(2016a). “The Vessantara-Jātaka and Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya Narrative.” Journal of the Oxford Centre for Buddhist Studies 11: 11–37. Reprint, 2017: 113–41.
———(2016b). Ekottarika-āgama Studies. Taipei: Dharma Drum Publishing Corporation.
———(2016c). “The Gradual Path of Training in the Dīrgha-āgama, From Sense-restraint to Imperturbability.” The Indian International Journal of Buddhist Studies 17: 1–24.
———(2017). Vinaya Studies. Dharma Drum Institute of Liberal Arts Research Series 7. Taipei: Dharma Drum Publishing Corporation.
Andersen, Dines, and Helmer Smith. Sutta-Nipāta. London, Boston, Melbourne and Henley: Pali Text Society, [1913] 1984.
Andō, Fusae 安藤 房枝. “Unkō sekkutsu dairokkutsu chūshinchū no butsuden setsuwa ukibori ni tsuite: fuse zuzō no sōshutsu no mondai wo chūshin ni 雲崗石窟第 6 窟中心柱の仏伝説話浮彫について:「布施」図像の創出の問題を中心に [A study of reliefs of Buddha’s life on a stūpa-pillar in Yungang Cave 6: Focusing on creation of ‘offering’ icon].” Studies in Aesthetics and Art History 美学美術史研究論集 23 (2008): 33–62.
Banerjee, Anukul Chandra. Two Buddhist Vinaya Texts in Sanskrit: Prātimokṣa Sūtra and Bhikṣukarmavākya. Calcutta: The World Press Private Limited, 1977.
Bareau, André. “La construction et le culte des stūpa d’après les Vinayapitaka.” Bulletin de l’École Française d’Extrême-Orient 50, no. 2 (1962): 229–74.
Bechert, Heinz. Bruchstücke buddhistischer Verssammlungen aus zentralasiatischen Sanskrithandschriften 1: Die Anavataptagāthā und die Sthaviragāthā. Sanskrittexte aus den Turfanfunden 6. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1961.
Bernhard, Franz. Udānavarga. 2 vols. Sanskrittexte aus den Turfanfunden 10. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1965–68.
Bhaiṣajyavastu Translation Team, trans. The Mahāsūtra “On Entering the City of Vaiśālī” (Vaiśālīpraveśamahāsūtra, Toh 312). 84000: Translating the Words of the Buddha, 2020.
Bonbunbutten-kenkyūkai 梵文仏典研究会 (1994). “Bonbun shamonkakyō wayaku (1) 梵文『沙門果経』和訳 (1) [An annotated Japanese translation of the Śrāmaṇyaphalasūtra (1)].” The Bulletin of the Association of Buddhist Studies, Bukkyo University 佛教大学仏教学会紀要 2: 1–32.
———(1995). “Bonbun shamonkakyō wayaku (2) 梵文『沙門果経』和訳 (2) [An annotated Japanese translation of the Śrāmaṇyaphalasūtra (2)].” The Bulletin of the Association of Buddhist Studies, Bukkyo University 佛教大学仏教学会紀要 3: 17–57.
Brockington, Mary. “Daśaratha, Śyāma, a Brāhman Hunter, and Śrāvaṇa: The Tale of Four Tales (with Pictures).” In From Turfan to Ajanta: Festschrift for Dieter Schlingloff on the Occasion of his Eightieth Birthday. Vol. 1, 89–116. Bhairahawa, Rupandehi: Lumbini International Research Institute, 2010.
Brown, W. Norman. “Duty as Truth in Ancient India.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 116, no. 3 (1972): 252–68.
Burnouf, Eugène. Introduction à l’histoire du buddhisme indien. 2nd ed. Paris: Maisonneuve, 1876. (1st ed. 1844).
Caillat, Colette. “Pāli ibbha, Vedic íbhya-*.” In Buddhist Studies in Honour of I.B. Horner: 41–49. Dordrecht-Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1974.
Champa Thupten Zongtse. Udānavarga. Band III. Sanskrittexte aus den Turfanfunden 10, 3. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1990.
Chandra Das, Sarat, and Hari Mohan Vidyābhūshaṇa. Avadāna Kalpalatā. Calcutta: The Royal Asiatic Society of Bengal, 1940.
Chavannes, Édouard. Cinq cents contes et apologues. 3 vols. Paris: Ernest Leroux, Éditeur, 1910–11.
Ch’en, Kenneth. “A Study of The Svāgata Story in The Divyāvadāna in Its Sanskrit, Pāli, Tibetan, and Chinese Versions.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 9, nos. 3/4 (1947): 207–314.
Choi, Jin kyoung. Three Sūtras from the Gilgit Dīrghāgama Manuscript: A Synoptic Critical Edition, Translation and Textual Analysis. PhD diss., Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 2015.
Choong, Mun-keat. The Fundamental Teachings of Early Buddhism: A comparative study based on the Sūtrāṅga portion of the Pali Saṃyutta-Nikāya and the Chinese Saṃyuktāgama. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2000.
Chung, Jin-il (1998). Die Pravāraṇā in den kanonischen Vinaya-Texten der Mūlasarvāstivādin und der Sarvāstivādin. Sanskrit-Wörterbuch der buddhistischen Texte aus den Turfan-Funden. Beiheft 7. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
———(2008). A Survey of the Sanskrit Fragments Corresponding to the Chinese Saṃyuktāgama 雜阿含經相當梵文斷片一覧. Tokyo: Sankibō busshorin.
Chung, Jin-il, and Takamichi Fukita. A Survey of the Sanskrit Fragments Corresponding to the Chinese Madhyamāgama. Tokyo: The Sankibo Press, 2011.
Chung, Jin-il, and Klaus Wille. “Fragmente aus dem Bhaiṣajyavastu der Sarvāstivādins in der Sammlung Pelliot (Paris).” Sanskrit-Texte aus dem buddhistischen Kanon: Neuentdeckungen und Neueditionen. Folge 4: 105–24. Sanskrit-Wörterbuch der buddhistischen Texte aus den Turfan-Funden. Beiheft 9. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2002.
Clarke, Shayne (2009). “Monks Who Have Sex: Pārājika Penance in Indian Buddhist Monasticisms.” Journal of Indian Philosophy 37: 1–43.
———(2014). Gilgit Manuscripts in the National Archives of India: Facsimile Edition vol. 1, Vinaya Texts. Tokyo: The International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology, Soka University.
———(2015). “Vinayas.” In Brill’s Encyclopedia of Buddhism, edited by Jonathan Silk et al., vol. 1, Literature and Languages, 60–87. Leiden: Brill, 2015.
———(2018). “Lost in Tibet, Found in Bhutan: The Unique Nature of the Mūlasarvāstivādin Law Code for Nuns.” Buddhism, Law & Society 2: 199–292.
Cowell, Edward Byles, and Robert Alexander Neil. [1886]. The Divyāvadāna, a Collection of Early Buddhist Legends. Delhi: Indological Book House, 1987.
Csoma Körösi, Alexander. “Analysis of the Dulva.” Asiatic Researches 20, no. 1 (1836): 41–93. Reprint, Tibetan Studies: being a reprint of the articles contributed to the Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal and Asiatic Researches. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadò, 1984.
Das, Chandra. Tibetan-English Dictionary. Calcutta: Bengal Secretariat Book Depôt, 1902. Reprint, Kyoto: Rinsen Book Co., 1969.
Das Gupta, Kabita. Viśvantarāvadāna, eine buddhistische Legende. Edition eines Textes auf Sanskrit und Tibetisch eingeleitet und übersetzt. PhD diss., Freie Universität Berlin, 1978.
Dave, K. N. Birds in Sanskrit Literature with 107 Bird Illustrations. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 2005.
De Chiara, Matteo. The Khotanese Sudhanāvadāna. Beiträge zur Indologie 48. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2013.
Deeg, Max. “Has Xuanzang really been in Mathurā? Interpretatio Sinica or Interpretatio Occidentalia—How to Critically Read the Records of the Chinese Pilgrim.” In Essays on East Asian Religion and Culture: Festschrift in honour of Nishiwaki Tsuneki on the occasion of his 65th birthday, 35–73. Kyoto: Editorial committee for the Festschrift in honour of Nishiwaki Tsuneki, 2007.
Degener, Almuth (1990). Das Kaṭhināvadāna. Indica et Tibetica Band 16. Bonn: Indica et Tibetica Verlag.
———(1991). “Die handschriftliche Überlieferung des Vinayavastu der Mūlasarvāstivādin. By Klaus Wille.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 111, no. 3: 588–89.
Delhey, Martin. “Vakkali: A New Interpretation of His Suicide.” Journal of the International College for Postgraduate Buddhist Studies 13 (2009): 67–108.
Demoto, Mitsuyo, and Michael Hahn. “Ergänzungen zur Überlieferung des Śyāmajātaka.” In From Turfan to Ajanta: Festschrift for Dieter Schlingloff on the Occasion of his Eightieth Birthday. Vol. 1, 215–48. Bhairahawa, Rupandehi: Lumbini International Research Institute, 2010.
Dhammadinnā (2014). “A Translation of a Discourse Quotation in the Tibetan Translation of the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya Parallel to Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama Discourse 36 and of the Discourse Quotations in Śamathadeva’s Abhidharmakośopāyikā-ṭīkā Parallel to Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama Discourses 39, 42, 45, 46, 55, 56, 57 and 58.” Dharma Drum Journal of Buddhist Studies 14: 73–128.
———(2015–16). “Women’s Aspirations and Soteriological Agency in Sarvāstivāda and Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya Narratives.” Buddhism, Law & Society 1: 33–67.
———(2018). “Karma Here and Now in a Mūlasarvāstivāda Avadāna: How the Bodhisattva Changed Sex and Was Born as a Female 500 Times*.” Annual Report of the International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology at Soka University 21: 63–94.
Dharmachakra Translation Committee, trans. (2013). The Play in Full (Lalitavistara, Toh 95). 84000: Translating the Words of the Buddha, 2013.
———trans. (2019). The Precious Discourse on the Blessed One’s Extensive Wisdom That Leads to Infinite Certainty (Niṣṭhāgatabhagavajjñānavaipulyasūtraratnānanta, Toh 317). 84000: Translating the Words of the Buddha, 2019.
———trans. (2021). Distinctly Ascertaining the Meanings (Arthaviniścayadharmaparyāya, Toh 317). 84000: Translating the Words of the Buddha, 2021.
———trans. (2023). trans. The Queen of Incantations: The Great Peahen (Toh 559). 84000: Translating the Words of the Buddha, 2023.
Dimitrov, Dragomir. “Some Remarks on the Rūpyāvatyavadāna of the Divyāvadāna(mālā).” In Bauddhasāhityastabakāvalī: Essays and Studies on Buddhist Sanskrit Literature dedicated to Claus Vogel by colleagues, students, and friends: 45–68. Indica et Tibetica Band 36. Marburg: Indica et Tibetica Verlag, 2008.
Durt, Hubert (1980). “Mahalla/Mahallaka et la crise de la communauté apprès le parinirvāṇa du Buddha.” In Indianisme et bouddhisme: Mélanges offerts à Mgr. Étienne Lamotte: 79–99. Louvain-la-Neuve: Université catholique de Louvain, Institut orientaliste.
———(1999). “The Offering of the Children of Prince Viśvantara/Sudāna in the Chinese Tradition.” Journal of the International College for Postgraduate Buddhist Studies 2: 147–82.
———(2000). “The Casting-off of Mādrī in the Northern Buddhist Literary Tradition.” Journal of the International College for Postgraduate Buddhist Studies 3: 133–58.
———(2005). “Kajaṅgalā, who could have been the last mother of the Buddha.” Journal of the International College for Postgraduate Buddhist Studies 9: 65–90.
Dutt, Nalinaksha. Gilgit Manuscripts, vol. 3 in 4 parts. Srinagar: Research Department, 1942–50. Reprint, Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications. 1984.
Edgerton, Franklin. [1953]. Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit Grammar and Dictionary. 2 vols. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1998.
Einoo, Shingo 永ノ尾 信悟 (1984). “Kodai indo saishiki bunken ni kijutsu sareta kokumotsu ryōkri 古代インド祭式文献に記述された穀物料理 [Definition of ancient Indian food from grain based on Vedic ritual literature].” Bulletin of the National Museum of Ethnology 国立民族学博物館研究報告 9, no.3: 521–32.
———(1988). Die Cāturmāsya oder die altindischen Tertialopfer dargestellt nach den Vorschriften der Brāhmaṇas und der Śrautasūtras. Monumenta Serindica No. 18. Tokyo: Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa.
Enomoto, Fumio 榎本文雄 (1984a). “Setsuissaiubukei āgama no tenkai: ‘Chūagon’ to ‘Zōagon’ wo megutte, 説一切有部系アーガマの展開: 『中阿含』と『雑阿含』をめぐって [The development of the Sarvāstivādin scriptures, with a special focus on the Madhyamāgama and Saṃyuktāgama].” Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies 印度學佛教學研究 32, no. 2: 1073–70.
———(1984b). “Higashi torukisutan shutsudo bonbun agon no keifu 東トルキスタン出土梵文阿含の系譜 [The lineage of transmission of the Sanskrit āgamas unearthed from Eastern Turkestan].” Kachō tanki daigaku kenkyū kiyō 華頂短期大学研究紀要 [Bulletin of Kacho Junior College] 29: 11–26.
———(1991–94). A Comprehensive Study of the Chinese Saṃyuktāgama: Indic Texts Corresponding to the Chinese Saṃyuktāgama as Found in the Sarvāstivāda-Mūlasarvāstivāda Literature Part 1: *Saṃgītanipāta. Kyoto.
Fausbøll, V. [1877–96]. The Jātaka together with its Commentary. 6 vols. Reprint, London: Pali Text Society, 1962–64.
Feer, Léon. [1884–98]. Saṃyutta-Nikāya. 5 vols. London/Oxford: Pali Text Society, 1975–2006.
Finnegan, Damchö Diana. “For the Sake of Women, Too”: Ethics and Gender in the Narratives of the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya. PhD diss., University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2009
Fiordalis, David. “The Buddha’s Great Miracle at Śrāvastī: a Translation from the Tibetan Mūlasarvāstivāda-vinaya.” Asian Literature and Translation 2, no. 3 (2014): 1–33.
Frauwallner, Erich. The Earliest Vinaya and the Beginnings of Buddhist Literature. Serie Orientale Roma 8. Roma: Istituto Italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente, 1956.
Fukita, Takamichi 吹田 隆道. “Soreyue ima, Ānanda yo: ‘jikie hōkie’ no seppō saikō それゆえ今、アーナンダよ―「自帰依・法帰依」の説法再考― [Therefore now, Ānanda: A reconsideration of the preaching of Atta-saraṇa and Dhamma-saraṇa].” In Kagawa Takao hakushi koki kinen ronshū: bukkyōgaku jōdogaku kenkyū 香川孝雄博士古稀記念論集 佛教学浄土学研究 [Studies on Buddhism and Pure Land Buddhism: Felicitation volume in Honour of Dr. Takao Kagawa on the occasion of his 70th birthday]:157–66. Kyoto: Nagata bunshōdō 永田文昌堂, 2001.
Glass, Andrew. Four Gāndhārī Saṃyuktāgama Sūtras: Senior Kharoṣṭhī Fragment 5. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press, 2007.
Gnoli, Raniero (1977–78). The Gilgit Manuscript of the Saṅghabhedavastu: Being the 17th and Last Section of the Vinaya of the Mūlasarvāstivādin. 2 vols. Serie Orientale Roma 49, nos. 1–2. Roma: Istituto Italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente.
———(1978). The Gilgit Manuscript of the Śayanāsanavastu and the Adhikaraṇavastu: Being the 15th and 16th Sections of the Vinaya of the Mūlasarvāstivādin. Serie Orientale Roma 50. Roma: Istituto Italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente.
Hahn, Michael. Poetical Visions of the Buddha’s Former Lives: Seventeen Legends from Haribhaṭṭa’s Jātakamālā. New Delhi: Aditya Prakashan, 2011.
Hara, Minoru. “Right in India and Left in China? On I-Ching’s Translation of the Sudhanakumārāvadāna.” In Amṛtadhārā: Professor R. N. Dandekar Felicitation Volume, 159–66. Delhi: Ajanta Publications, 1984.
Harrison, Paul, and Jens-Uwe Hartmann, eds. From Birch Bark to Digital Data: Recent Advances in Buddhist Manuscript Research. Papers Presented at the Conference Indic Buddhist Manuscripts: The State of the Field, Stanford, June 15–19 2009. Vienna: Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2014.
Hartmann, Jens-Uwe (1991). “Endangered by Man-eating Witches: a Fragment of the Siṃhalāvadana from the Turfan Finds.” In Papers in Honour of Prof. Dr. Ji Xianlin on the Occasion of His 80th Birthday. Vol. 2, 563–75. Nanchang shi: Jiangxi renmin chubanshe 江西人民出版社.
———(2004). “Contents and Structure of the Dīrghāgama of the (Mūla-)Sarvāstivādins.” Annual Report of the International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology at Soka University 7: 119–37.
Hartmann, Jens-Uwe, and Klaus Wille. “The Manuscript of the Dīrghāgama and the Private Collection in Virginia.” In Harrison and Hartmann, eds., 2014: 137–55.
Hashimoto, Sōko 橋本 草子. “Shuyāma honjō setsuwa no henyō シュヤーマ本生説話の変容: 仏典を中心とする [The Change of Śyāma Jātaka].” Kyōto Women’s University Journal of Humanities 京都女子大学人文論叢 50 (2002):109–30.
Hikata, Ryūshō 干潟 龍祥. Honjōkyōrui no shisōshi teki kenkyū 本生経類の思想史的研究 [“A historical study of the thoughts in jātakas and similar stories”]. Tokyo: Sankibō busshorin 山喜房佛書林. Revised and enlarged edition, 1978.
Hinüber, Oskar von. “The Gilgit Manuscripts: An Ancient Buddhist Library in Modern Research.” In Harrison and Hartmann, eds., 2014: 79–135.
Hirakawa, Akira 平川 彰. Nihyakugojikkai no kenkyū 二百五十戒の研究 [“Studies on the two hundred and fifty rules”]. 4 vols. Hirakawa Akira chosakushū 平川彰著作集 [The collected works of Akira Hirakawa] vol. 14–17. Tokyo: Shunjūsha 春秋社,1993–95.
Hiraoka, Satoshi 平岡 聡 (1998). “The Relation between the Divyāvadāna and the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya.” Journal of Indian Philosophy 26: 419–34.
———(2002a). “Shikishin toshite kinō suru budda no aikon: buttō wo meguru setsuissaiubu no ritsu to ron tono sogo 色身として機能するブッダのアイコン: 仏塔を巡る説一切有部の律と論との齟齬 [The icon of the Buddha functioning as his material body].” In Sakurabe hakushi kiju kinen ronshū 櫻部建博士喜寿記念論集 初期仏教からアビダルマへ [“Early Buddhism and Abhidharma thought: in honor of Doctor Hajime Sakurabe on his seventy-seventh birthday”], 185–98. Kyoto: Heirakuji shoten 平楽寺書店.
———(2002b). Setsuwa no kōkogaku: Indo bukkyō setsuwa ni himerareta shisō 説話の考古学: ンド仏教説話に秘められた思想 [“The archaeology of narratives: thoughts hidden in Indian Buddhist narratives”]. Tokyo: Daizō shuppan 大蔵出版.
———(2007). Budda ga nazotoku sanze no monogatari: ‘Diviya-avadāna’ zen’yaku ブッダが謎解く三世の物語 『ディヴィヤ・アヴァダーナ』全訳 [“The stories of the past, present, and future revealed by the Buddha: a complete translation of the Divyāvadāna”]. 2 vols. Tokyo: Daizō shuppan 大蔵出版.
———(2009). “Text critical remarks on the Divyāvadāna (1).” Annual Report of the International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology 12: 29–72.
———(2011). “Review Article: The Divyāvadāna in English.” Indo-Iranian Journal 54: 231–70.
Hirata, Masahiro 平田 昌弘, Nozomi Itagaki 板垣 希美, Kenji Uchida 内田 健治, Masa’aki Hanada 花田 正明, and Masahito Kawai 河合 正人. “Ko-chūki indo-āria bunken ‘Veda bunken’ ‘Pāli seiten’ ni motozuita minami ajia no kodai nyūseihin no saigen to dōtei 古・中期インド・アーリア文献 「Veda 文献」 「Pāli 聖典」に基づいた南アジアの古代乳製品の再現と同定 [Reproduction and identification of ancient dairy products in South Asia based on the old and middle Indo-Aryan literatures, ‘Vedic ritual’ and the ‘Pāli canon’].” Nihon Chikusan Gakkaihō 日本畜産学会報 84, no. 2 (2013): 175–90.
Hofinger, Marcel (1954) [1982] Le congrès du Lac Anavatapta (Vies de saints bouddhiques): Extrait du Vinaya des Mūlasarvāstivādin Bhaiṣajyavastu 1, Légendes des anciens (Sthavirāvadāna). Louvain: Publications Universitaires.
———(1990). Le congrès du Lac Anavatapta (Vies de saints bouddhiques): Extrait du Vinaya des Mūlasarvāstivādin Bhaiṣajyavastu 2, Légendes du Buddha (Buddhāvadāna). Louvain-la-Neuve: Université Catholique de Louvain, Institut orientaliste.
Honjō, Yoshifumi 本庄 良文 (1984). A Table of Āgama-Citations in the Abhidharmakośa and the Abhidharmakoṣopāyikā Part 1 倶舎論所依阿含全表. Kyoto: private edition.
———(2014). Kusharonchū Upāikā no kenkyū: Yakuchūhen 倶舎論註ウパーイカーの研究 訳註篇 [“A study of the Abhidharmakośopāyikā-ṭīkā: an annotated translation”]. 2 vols. Tokyo: Daizō Shuppan 大蔵出版.
Hosoda Noriaki 細田 典明 (1991). “Sanskrit Fragments from the Parivrājakasaṃyukta of the Saṃyuktāgama (3).” Journal of Indian philosophy and Buddhism 印度哲学仏教学 6: 172–91.
———(2006). “ ‘Zōagon’ Dōhon to ‘Komponsetsuissaiubu binaya yakuji.’ 『雑阿含』道品と『根本説一切有部毘奈耶薬事』 [Saṃyuktāgama Mārgavarga and Mūlasarvāstivāda-vinaya Bhaiṣajyavastu].” Journal of Buddhist Studies 佛教學 48: 1–20.
———(2014). “ ‘Zōagon’ Dōhon Nenjo Sō’ō 『雑阿含』道品念處相応 [Smṛtyupastāna-saṃyukta of the Mārgavarga, Saṃyuktāgama].” Journal of Indian Philosophy and Buddhism インド哲学仏教学論集 2: 47–169.
Ingalls, Daniel Henry Holmes. “Source of a Mūlasarvāstivādin Story of the Origin of the Ganges.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 14 (1951):185–88.
Ishikawa, Mie. A Critical Edition of the sGra sbyor bam po gnyis pa: An Old and Basic Commentary on the Mahāvyutpatti. Tokyo: Toyo Bunko, 1990.
Iwamoto, Yutaka 岩本 裕 (1967). Bukkyō setsuwa kenkyū dai’ichi: Bukkyō setsuwa kenkyū josetsu 佛教説話研究第一 佛教説話研究序説 [“A Study of Buddhist narrative literature vol. 1: An introduction to the study of Buddhist narrative literature”]. Kyoto: Hōzōkan 法藏館. Revised edition, 1978.
———(1978). Bukkyō setsuwa kenkyū josetsu: Bukkyō setsuwa kenkyū vol. 1 仏教説話研究序説: 仏教説話研究 第一巻 [“An introduction to the study of Buddhist narrative literature: a study of Buddhist narrative literature vol. 1”]. Tokyo: Kaimei shoin 開明書院.
———(1979). Sumāgadā avadāna kenkyū [“A study of the Sumāgadhāvadāna”]. Tokyo: Kaimei shoin 開明書院.
Jaini, Padmanabh S. “The Story of Sudhana and Manoharā: An Analysis of the Texts and the Borobudur Reliefs.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 29, no. 3 (1966): 533–58.
Jäschke, H. A. 1881. Tibetan English Dictionary. London: The Secretary of State for India in Council. Compact edition, Kyoto: Rinsen Book Co., 1993.
Jamspal, Lozang, and Kaia Tara Fischer, trans. The Hundred Deeds (Karmaśataka, Toh 340). 84000: Translating the Words of the Buddha, 2020.
Ji, Xianlin. 1943. “Parallelversionen zur tocharischen Rezension des Punyavanta-Jātaka.” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 97, no. 2: 284–324. The author’s name is given as Dschi Hiän-lin.
Jones, John James. 1949–56. The Mahāvastu. 3 vols. Reprint, London: Pali Text Society, 1973–78.
Kalsang Gyaltsen, Venerable Khenpo and Chodrungma Kunga Chodron, trans. The Exemplary Tale of Sumāgadhā (Sumāgadhāvadāna, Toh 346). 84000: Translating the Words of the Buddha, 2024.
Kane, Pandurang Vaman. History of Dharmaśāstra (Ancient and Medieval Religious and Civil Law), vol. iii. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Risearch Institute, 1973.
Karashima, Seishi, and Margarita I. Vorobyova Desyatovskaya. “The Avadāna Anthology from Merv, Turkmenistan.” In Buddhist Manuscripts from Central Asia: The St. Petersburg Sanskrit Fragments (StPSF), vol. 1, edited by Seishi Karashima and Margarita I. Vorobyova-Desyatovskaya, 145–523. Tokyo: The Institute of Oriental Manuscripts of the Russian Academy of Sciences and the International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology, Soka University, 2015.
Khoroche, Peter. Once a Peacock, Once an Actress: Twenty-Four Lives of the Bodhisattva from Haribhaṭṭa’s “Jātakamālā”. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press, 2017.
Kieffer-Pülz, Petra. Review of Silk, Jonathan A., Managing Monks. Administrators and Administrative Roles in Indian Buddhist Monasticism. Indo-Iranian Journal 53 (2010): 71–88.
Kishino, Ryōji IV (2013). A Study of the Nidāna: An Underrated Canonical Text of the Mūlasarvāstivāda-vinaya. PhD diss., University of California, Los Angeles.
———(2016). “A Further Study of the Muktaka of the Mūlasarvāstivāda-vinaya: A Table of Contents and Parallels.” The Bulletin of the Association of Buddhist Studies, Bukkyo University. 21: 227–83.
Kritzer, Robert. Garbhāvakrāntisūtra: The Sūtra on Entry into the Womb. Tokyo: The International Institute for Buddhist Studies, 2014.
Kuan, Tse-fu. “Legends and Transcendence: Sectarian Affiliations of the Ekottarikāgama in Chinese Translation.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 133, no. 4 (2013): 607–34.
Kudō, Nobuyuki (2004). The Karmavibhaṅga: Transliterations and Annotations of the Original Sanskrit Manuscripts from Nepal. Tokyo: The International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology.
———(2015). “Newly Identified Manuscripts in the Gilgit Buddhist Manuscripts: Avadānas and Dhāraṇīs.” Annual Report of The International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology at Soka University 18: 253–62.
———(2017). Gilgit Manuscripts in the National Archives of India: Facsimile Edition vol. 3, Avadānas and Miscellaneous Texts. Tokyo: The International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology, Soka University.
Lamotte, Étienne (1944–1980). Le traité de la grande vertu de sagesse de Nāgārjuna (Mahāprajñāpāramitāśāstra). 5 vols. Volumes 1–2 were originally published by Bureaux du Muséon in Louvain in 1944 and 1949, respectively, and reprinted by Institute orientaliste of the Université de Louvain in Louvain-la-Neuve in 1981. Volumes 3–5 were published by the latter publisher in 1970, 1976, and 1980.
———(1951). “Alexandre et le bouddhisme.” Bulletin de l’École Française d’Extrême-Orient 44, no. 1: 147–62.
———(1957). “Khuddakanikāya and Kṣudrakapiṭaka.” East and West 7, no. 4: 341–48.
———(1958). Histoire du bouddhisme indien, des origines à l’ère Śaka. Bibliothèque du Muséon. Vol. 43. Louvain: Publications universitaires, Institut orientaliste.
———(1966). “Vajrapāṇi en Inde.” Mélanges de sinologie offerts à Monsieur Paul Demièville II. Bibliothèque de l’Institut des hautes études chinoises. Vol. 20, 113–59. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
———(1988). History of Indian Buddhism. Louvain-la-Neuve: Université Catholique de Louvain, Institute orientaliste. Translated by Sara Webb-Boin.
Li, Rongxi. The Great Tang Dynasty Record of the Western Regions. Berkeley: Numata Center for Buddhist Translation and Research, 1996.
Li, Wei. Schwanfrau und Prinz: Die chinesische Frühform einer Divyāvadāna-Legende. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2012.
Lilley, Mary E. The Apadāna. 2 vols. Oxford: Pali Text Society, 2000.
Liu, Zhen 劉 震. Chanding yu kuxiu : guan yu fozhuan yuanchu fanben de faxian he yanjiu 禅定与苦修: 関于佛伝原初梵本的發現和研究 [Dhyānāni tapaś ca: meditation and ascetic practice: the finding of an original Sanskrit manuscript on the Buddha’s biography and its study]. Shanghai: Shanghai guji 上海古籍, 2010.
Malalasekera, G.P. Dictionary of Pāli Proper Names. 2 vols. London: Pali Text Society, 1937.
Mayeda, Egaku 前田 惠學. Genshi bukkyō seiten no seiritsushi kenkyū 原始佛教聖典の成立史研究 [“A history of the formation of original Buddhist scriptures”]. Tokyo: Sankibō busshorin 山喜房佛書林, 1964.
Matsumoto, Junko 松本 純子. “Kachangarā monogatari: musuko eno omoi: “karumashataka” dai 33 wa and dai 42 wa カチャンガラー物語・息子への想い―『カルマシャタカ』第 33 話・第 42 話 和訳― [The story of Kacaṅgalā: love for her son. Japanese translations of the 33rd and 42nd story of the Karmaśataka].” Zentsūji kyōgaku shinkōkai kiyō 善通寺教学振興会紀要 15 (2010): 1–15.
Matsumura, Hisashi松村 恒 (1980). Four Avadānas from the Gilgit Manuscripts. PhD diss., Australian National University.
———(1985). “Raitawarakyō no tenkai no ichidammen 頼吒和羅経の展開の一断面 [An aspect of the development of the Rāṣṭrapāla-sūtra].” Buddhist Studies 佛教研究 (國際佛教徒協會) 15: 39–62.
———(1988a). “Gleanings from the Gilgit Manuscripts—Serial No. 1: Vinayavastu—.” Aligarh Journal of Oriental Studies 5: 163–76.
———(1988b). The Mahāsudarśanāvadāna and The Mahāsudarśanasūtra. Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications.
———(1989a). “Āyuḥparyantasūtra: Das Sūtra von der Lebensdauer in den verschiedenen Welten Text in Sanskrit und Tibetisch.” In Sanskrit-Texte aus dem buddhistischen Kanon: Neuentdeckungen und Neueditionen, Folge 1, 70–100. Sanskrit-Wörterbuch der buddhistischen Texte aus den Turfan-Funden. Beiheft 2. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
———(1989b). “Preamble to the Anavataptagāthā.” Buddhist Studies 佛教研究 (國際佛教徒協會) 18: 125–60.
Matsuyama, Shuntarō 松山 俊太郎 (1980–2002). “Kodai indo jin no yoso’oi 古代インド人のよそおい [Ancient Indian makeup].” Keshō bunka 化粧文化 3–42.
Melzer, Gudrun (2010a). Ein Abschnitt aus dem Dīrghāgama. PhD diss., Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.
———(2010b). “Sanskrit sources corresponding to the Caityapradakṣiṇagāthā inscription in Alchi.” Berliner Indologische Studien 19: 54–70. Appendix B in Kurt Tropper, “The Caityapradakṣiṇagāthā Inscription in Alchi: A Valuable Witness for Kanjur Studies.” Berliner Indologische Studien 19: 15–70.
Miller, Robert. The Chapter on Going Forth (Pravryjyāvastu, Toh 1-1). 84000: Translating the Words of the Buddha, 2018.
Mizuno, Kōgen 水野 弘元 (1981). Hokku kyō no kenkyū 法句経の研究 [“A study of the Dharmapada”]. Tokyo: Shunjūsha 春秋社.
———(1992). “ ‘Suttanipāta’ no ge ya kyō no taiōhyō 『スッタニパータ』の偈や経の対応表 [A comparative study of the Suttanipāta].” Buddhist Studies 佛教研究 (國際佛教徒協會) 21: 2–56.
———(1993). “Chōrōe, chōrōnige no taishōhyō 長老偈, 長老尼偈の対応表 [A comparative study of the Theragāthā and the Therīgāthā].” Buddhist Studies 佛教研究 (國際佛教徒協會) 22: 3–83.
———(1995). “Shohokkukyō no ge no hikaku taishō 諸法句経の偈の比較対照 [A comparison of the verses of the Dhammapada texts].” Buddhist Studies 佛教研究 (國際佛教徒協會) 24: 5–76.
Monier-Williams, Monier. A Sanskrit-English Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1899.
Morris, Richard, A.K. Warder, E. Hardy, and Mabel Hunt. [1885–1961]. The Anguttara-nikāya. 6 vols. Reprint, London: Pali Text Society, 1958–76.
Muldoon-Hules, Karen Maria. “Of Milk and Motherhood: The Kacaṅgalā Avadāna Read in a Brahmanical Light.” Religions of South Asia 3, no. 1 (2009): 111–24.
Murakami, Shinkan 村上 真完. Sai’iki no bukkyō: bezekuriku seiganga kō 西域の仏教: ベゼクリク誓願画考 [“The praṇidhi scenes of the cave temples at Bezeklik in Chinese Turkestan”]. Tokyo: Daisan bunmei sha 第三文明社, 1984.
Namikawa, Takayoshi 並川 孝儀. Indo bukkyō kyōdan shōryōbu no kenkyū インド仏教教団正量部の研究 [“A study of the Indian Buddhist Sāṃmitīya sect”]. Tokyo: Daizō shuppan 大藏出版, 2011.
Nattier, Jan. “The Realm of Akṣobhya: A Missing Piece in the History of Pure Land Buddhism.” Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 23, no. 1 (2000): 71–102.
Negi, J. S. Tibetan-Sanskrit Dictionary. 16 vols. Sarnath/Varanasi: Central Institute of Higher Tibetan Studies, 1993–2005.
Nishimoto, Ryūzan 西本 龍山. Ritsubu 律部 [Vinaya section] 23. Kokuyaku issaikyō 國譯一切經 [“A translation of the complete Buddhist canon into classical Japanese in kakikudashi style”]. Tokyo: Daitō shuppansha 大東出版社, 1933.
Nishimura, Naoko. “Processing of Dairy Products in the Vedic Ritual, Compared with Pāli.” In Vedic Studies: Language, Text, Culture and Philosophy, Proceedings of the 15th World Sanskrit Conference: 211–42. New Delhi: D.K. Printworld, 2014.
Norman, K.R. [1906]. The Commentary on the Dhammapada. 4 vols. Reprint, London: Pali Text Society, 1970.
Ogihara, Hirotoshi 荻原 裕敏 (2010). “Tokarago A Bṛhaddyuti-Jātaka no buhakizoku ni tsuite トカラ語 A 《 Bṛhaddyuti-Jātaka 》の部派帰属について [On the school affiliation of the Bṛhaddyuti-Jātaka in Tocharian A].” Tokyo University Linguistic Papers 東京大学言語学論集 30: 169–86.
———(2011). “Arannakyō ni hitei sareta SHT shoshū bongo danpen ni tsuite 「 阿蘭那經」に比定された SHT 所収梵語断片について [Sanskrit fragments identified as the Ālánnàjīng in SHT].” Tokyo University Linguistics Papers 東京大学言語学論集 31: 235–68.
———(2015a). “Tuhuoluoyu wenxian suojian foming xilie–yi chutu fodian yu kumutula kuqun 吐火羅語文献所見佛名系列–以出土佛典与庫木吐喇窟群区第 34 窟榜題爲例 [Lists of former buddhas in Tocharian texts: A comparative study of unearthed manuscripts and captions in Kumtura Cave no. 34].” Literature & History of ern Regions 西域文史 9: 33–49.
———(2015b). “The transmission of Buddhist Texts to Tokharian Buddhism.” Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 38: 295–312.
———(2016a). “ ‘Komponsetsuissaiuburitsu yakuji’ ni kanren suru niten no tokarago B dampen ni tsuite 『根本説一切有部律薬事』に関連する二点のトカラ語 B 断片について [On two Tokharian fragments related to the Bhaiṣajyavastu of the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya].” In Shirukurōdo to kindai nihon no kaikō: sai’iki kodai shiryō to nihon kindai bukkyō シルクロードと近代日本の邂逅―西域古代資料と日本近代仏教 [The encounter of the Silk Road and modern Japan: ancient Central Asian materials and modern Japanese Buddhism], 258–76, Tokyo: Bensei shuppan 勉誠出版.
———(2016b). “Doitsu shozō tokarago B dampen B384 ni tsuite ドイツ所蔵トカラ語 B 断片 B384 について [Tocharian Fragment B384 of the Berlin Turfan Collection].” Tokyo University Linguistics Papers 東京大学言語学論集 37: e69–e79.
Okada, Mamiko 岡田 真美子. “Ryū honjō (2) kukishashintan to ryūnikushoku setsuwa 龍本生 (2) 救飢捨身譚と龍肉食説話—根本説一切有部薬事を中心に— [Former birth stories of the Buddha: Naga (2)].” Bulletin of Kobe Women’s University 神戸女子大学紀要 (文学部篇) 26, no. 1 (1993): 157–68.
Okano, Kiyoshi 岡野 潔 (2006). “Anavataptagāthā no shakuson no gō no zanshi wo toku innenwa no keisei, Anavataptagāthā の釈尊の業の残滓を説く因縁話の形成 [An essay on formations of the Buddhāvadāna of the Anavataptagāthā and its parallels].” Ronshū 論集, Indogaku shūkyō gakkai 印度学宗教学会 33: 73–93.
———(2007). “Kṣemendra no Daśakarmaplutyavadāna—Bodhisattvāvadānakalpalatā dai 50 shō no kōtei to yaku, Kṣemendraの Daśakarmaplutyavadāna — Bodhisattvāvadānakalpalatā 第 50 章の校訂と訳— [Kṣemendra’s Daśakarmaplutyavadāna: a text-critical edition and translation of the 50th chapter of the Bodhisattvāvadānakalpalatā].” South Asian Classical Studies 南アジア古典学 2: 201–301.
———(2008). “Avadānakalpalatā 55 章、 91–92 章と Karmaśataka 125–126 話—Sarvaṃdada, Śibi, Maitrakanyaka の校訂・和訳— [The Avadānakalpalatā chs. 55, 91, and 92 and the Karmaśataka 125, 126: texts and translations of Sarvaṃdada, Sibi, and Maitrakanyaka].” South Asian Classical Studies 南アジア古典学 3: 57–155.
———(2010). “Kalpalatā と Avadānamālā の研究 (1)―Vidura, Kaineyaka, Śreṣṭhipretībhūta の説話 [A study of the Kalpalatā and Avadānamālā 1: the stories of Vidura, Kaineyaka, and Śreṣṭhipretībhūta].” South Asian Classical Studies 南アジア古典学 5: 51–127.
Oldenberg, Hermann. [1879–83]. The Vinaya Piṭakaṃ. 5 vols. London and Oxford: The Pali Text Society, 1982–97.
Oldenberg, Hermann, and Richard Pischel. [1883]. The Thera- and Therī-gāthā. London: The Pali Text Society, 1966.
Olivelle, Patrick. A Sanskrit Dictionary of Law and Statecraft. Delhi: Primus Books, 2015.
Ono, Genmyo 小野 玄妙. Bukkyō no bijutsu oyobi rekishi 佛教之美術及歷史 [“Buddhist Art and History”]. Tokyo: Bussho kenkyū kai 佛書研究會, 1916.
Panglung, Jampa Losang (1980). “Preliminary Remarks on the Uddānas in the Vinaya of the Mūlasarvāstivādin.” In Tibetan Studies in Honour of Hugh Richardson: Proceedings the International Seminar on Tibetan Studies, Oxford, 1979, 226–32. Warminster: Aris & Phillips.
———(1981). Die Erzählstoffe des Mūlasarvāstivāda-Vinaya: Analysiert auf Grund der tibetischen Übersetzung. Studia Philologica Buddhica: Monograph Series 3. Tokyo: The Reiyukai Library.
Park, Chongdok, C.H. “The Buddha’s Eating of Horse-Fodder Barley in the Mūlasarvāstivādin Vinaya.” In Buddhist Narrative in Asia and Beyond, 31–44. Bangkok: Institute of Thai Studies, Chulalongkorn University, 2012.
Pathak, Suniti K. “A Dharani-Mantra in the Vinaya-Vastu.” Bulletin of Tibetology 2 (1989): 31–39.
Pinaut, Georges-Jean. Chrestomathie tokharienne: textes et grammaire. Leuven-Paris: Peeters, 2008.
Pradhan, P. Abhidharm-koshabhāṣya of Vasubandhu. Patna: K. P. Jayaswal Research Institute, 1967.
Przyluski, Jean. “Le nord-ouest de l’Inde dans le Vinaya des Mūla-Sarvāstivādins et les textes apparentés.” Journal Asiatique 11ͤ série, tome 4 (1914): 493–568.
Ramers, Peter. Die “drei Kapitel über die Sittlichkeit” im Śrāmāṇyaphala-sūtra. PhD diss., Rheinischen Friedrich-Willhelms-Universität zu Bonn, 1996.
Rhys Davids, Thomas William, J. Estlin Carpenter, and William Stede. The Sumaṅgala-vilāsinī Buddhaghosa’s commentary on the Dīgha Nikāya. 3 vols. London: Pali Text Society, 1968–71. Second edition.
Rhys Davids, Thomas William, and J. Estlin Carpenter. 1890–1911. The Dīgha Nikāya. 3 vols. Reprint, London: Pali Text Society, 1966–76.
Rhys Davids, Thomas William, and William Stede. The Pali Text Society’s Pali-English Dictionary. London: The Pali Text Society. 1921–25. Revised reprint, 2015.
Rosen, Valentina. Der Vinayavibhaṅga zum Bhikṣuprātimokṣa der Sarvāstivādins. Sanskrittexte aus den Turfanfunden 2. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1959.
Rotman, Andy. Divine Stories: Divyāvadāna. 2 vols. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2008–17.
Sadakata, Akira 定方 晟. “Kinnara キンナラ.” Proceedings of the Faculty of Letters of Tokai University 東海大学紀要 文学部 32 (1979): 31–43.
Sakaki, Ryōzaburō 榊 亮三郎 (1912–15). “Diviāvadāna no kenkyū narabini hon’yaku 「 デイヸアーヷダーナ」の研究並に翻譯 [A study and translation of the Divyāvadāna].” Rokujō gakuhō 六條學報 134–38, 140–50, 152, 153, 155–59, 161, 162, 169.
———[1916] (1998). Bonzōkanwa shiyaku taikō hon’yaku myōgi taishū 梵藏漢和四譯對校 飜譯名義大集 [“A quadrilingual Sanskrit-Tibetan-Chinese-Japanese edition of the Mahāvyutpatti”]. Kyoto: Rinsen Shoten 臨川書店.
Salomon, Richard (2008). Two Gāndhārī Manuscripts of the Songs of Lake Anavatapta (Anavataptagāthā): British Library Kharoṣṭhī Fragment 1 and Senior Scroll 14. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press.
———(2018). The Buddhist Literature of Ancient Gandhāra. Somerville: Wisdom Publications.
Sarma, Sreeramula Rajeswara. “Some Medieval Arithmetical Tables.” Indian Journal of History of Science, 32(3), 1997.
Sasaki, Shizuka 佐々木 閑 (1999). Shukke toha nanika 出家とはなにか [“What is ‘going forth?’”]. Tokyo: Daizō shuppan 大藏出版.
———(2000). “Basharon to ritsu 婆沙論と律 [Vinayas quoted in the Vibhāṣā].” Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies 印度學佛教學研究 49(1): 421–413.
Schiefner, Anton [1882]. Tibetan Tales Derived from Indian Sources. Translated into English by W. R. S. Ralston. Reprint, The Bible of Tibet: Tibetan Tales from Indian Sources. London: Kegan Paul, 2003.
Schlingloff, Dieter (1977). “König Prabhāsa und der Elefant.” Indologica Taurinensia 5: 139–52.
———(1985). “Das śyāma-Jātaka: Schultradition und Bildüberlieferung einer buddhistischen Legende.” In Zur Schulzugehörigkeit von Werken der Hīnayāna-Literatur, Teil 1, 203–18. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
———(2000). Erzählende Wandmalereien Vol I Interpretation. Ajanta: Handbuch der Malereien 1. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
———(2013). Narrative Wall-paintings Vol. I Interpretation. Ajanta: Handbook of the Paintings 1. New Delhi: Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts. English version of Schlingloff 2000.
Schmithausen, Lambert. “Beiträge zur Schulzugehörigkeit und Textgeschichte kanonischer und postkanonischer buddhistischer Materialien.” In Zur Schulzugehörigkeit von Werken der Hīnayāna-Literatur, Teil 2, 304–435. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1987.
Schopen, Gregory (1985). “Two Problems in the History of Indian Buddhism: The Layman/Monk Distinction and the Doctrines of the Transference of Merit.” Studien zur Indologie und Iranistik 10: 9–47. Reprint, 1997: 23–55.
———(1987). “Burial Ad Sanctos and the Physical Presence of the Buddha in Early Indian Buddhism: A Study in the Archaeology of Religions.” Religion 17: 193–225. Reprint, 1997: 114–47.
———(1995). “Monastic Law Meets the Real World: A Monk’s Continuing Right to Inherit Family Property in Classical India.” History of Religions 35, no. 2: 101–23. Reprint, 2004a: 170–92.
———(1996). “The Lay Ownership of Monasteries and the Role of the Monk in Mūlasarvāstivādin Monasticism.” Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 19, no. 1: 81–126. Reprint, 2004a: 219–59.
———(1997). Bones, Stones, and Buddhist Monks: Collected Papers on the Archaeology, Epigraphy, and Texts of Monastic Buddhism in India. Honolulu: University of Hawai’ i Press.
———(1999). “The Bones of a Buddha and the Business of a Monk: Conservative Monastic Values in an Early Mahāyāna Polemical Tract.” Journal of Indian Philosophy 27: 279–324. Reprint, 2005a: 63–107.
———(2000). “Hierarchy and Housing in a Buddhist Monastic Code: A Translation of the Sanskrit Text of the Śayanāsanavastu of the Mūlasarvāstivāda-vinaya.” Buddhist Literature 2: 92–196.
———(2004a). Buddhist Monks and Business Matters: Still More Papers on Monastic Buddhism in India. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
———(2004b). “On Buddhist Monks and Dreadful Deities: Some Monastic Devices for Updating the Dharma.” In Gedenkschrift J. W. de Jong, 161–84. Studia Philologica Buddhica: Monograph Series 17. Tokyo: International Institute for Buddhist Studies of the International College for Postgraduate Buddhist Studies. Reprint, 2014: 333–57.
———(2005a). Figments and Fragments of Mahāyāna Buddhism in India: More Collected Papers. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
———(2005b). “Taking the Bodhisattva into Town: More Texts on the Image of ‘the Bodhisattva’ and Image Processions in the Mūlasarvāstivāda-vinaya.” East and West 55: 299–311. Reprint, 2014: 390–403.
———(2007). “The Learned Monk as a Comic Figure: On Reading a Buddhist Vinaya as Indian Literature.” Journal of Indian Philosophy 35: 201–26. Reprint, 2014: 404–31.
———(2008). “On Emptying Chamber Pots without Looking and the Urban Location of Buddhist Nunneries in Early India Again.” Journal Asiatique 296.2: 229–56. Reprint, 2014: 23–46.
———(2012). “A New Hat for Hārītī: On ‘Giving’ Children for Their Protection to Buddhist Monks and Nuns in Early India.” Little Buddhas: Children and Childhoods in Buddhist Texts and Traditions, 17–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Reprint, 2014: 131–56.
———(2014). Buddhist Nuns, Monks, and Other Worldly Matters: Recent Papers on Monastic Buddhism in India, Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
———, (2018). “On Monks and Emergencies: The Brahmanical Principle of Āpad in a Buddhist Monastic Code.” In Reading Slowly: A Festschrift for Jens E. Braarvig, 375–91. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
Senart, Émile. Le Mahāvastu, texte sanscrit publié pour la première fois et accompagné d’introductions et d’un commentaire. 3 vols. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale, 1882–97.
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1950). “Notes on the Divyāvadāna Part 1.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland: 166–84.
———(1951). “Notes on the Divyāvadāna Part 2.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland: 82–102.
Shimoda, Masahiro 下田 正弘. Nehangyō no kenkyū: Daijō kyōten no kenkyū hōhō shiron 涅槃経の研究―大乗経典の研究方法試論 [“A study of the Mahāparinirvāṇasūtra with a focus on the methodology of the study of the Mahāyāna sūtras”]. Tokyo: Shunjūsha 春秋社, 1997.
Shōno, Masanori. “Local Buddhist Monastic Agreements among the (Mūla)sarvāstivādins.” Buddhist Studies Review 34, no. 1 (2017): 53–66.
Silk, Jonathan A. Managing Monks: Administrators and Administrative Roles in Indian Buddhist Monasticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Skilling, Peter (1994–97). Mahāsūtras. 2 vols. Oxford: The Pali Text Society.
———(1999). “ ‘Arise, go forth, devote yourselves…’: A verse summary of the teaching of the Buddhas.” In Socially Engaged Buddhism for the New Millennium: Essays in Honor of the Ven. Phra Dhammapitaka (Bhikkhu P.A. Payutto) on His 60th Birthday Anniversary, 440–44. Bangkok: Sathirakoses-Nagapradipa Foundation & Foundation For Children.
———(2000). “Vasubandhu and the Vyākhyāyukti Literature.” Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 23, no. 2: 297–350.
———(2003). “On the Agnihotramukhā Yajñāḥ Verses.” In Jainism and Early Buddhism: Essays in Honor of Padmanabh S. Jaini, 637–667. Fremont California: Asian Humanities Press.
———(2007). “Zombies and Half-Zombies: Mahāsūtras and Other Protective Measures.” The Journal of Pali Text Society 29: 313–30.
Skilling, Peter, and Paul Harrison. “What’s in a Name? Sarvāstivādin Interpretations of the Epithets ‘Buddha’ and ‘Bhagavat.’ ” In Buddhism and Jainism: Essays in Honour of Dr. Hōjun Nagasaki on His Seventieth Birthday, 131–56. Kyoto: Heirakuji shoten, 2005.
Steinthal, Paul. Udāna. London: Pali Text Society, 1982.
Straube, Martin (2006). Prinz Sudhana und die Kinnarī: Eine buddhistische Liebesgeschichte von Kṣemendra Texte, Übersetzung, Studie. Indica et Tibetica Band 46. Marburg: Indica et Tibetica Verlag.
———(2009). Studien zur Bodhisattvāvadānakalpalatā: Texte und Quellen der Parallelen zu Haribhaṭṭas Jātakamālā. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
Strong, John (1983). “Filial Piety and Buddhism: The Indian Antecedents to a ‘Chinese’ problem.” In Traditions in Contact and Change: Selected Proceedings of the XIVth Congress of the International Association for the History of Religions, 171–86, 699–701. Waterloo, Ont.: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
———(1992). The Legend and Cult of Upagupta: Sanskrit Buddhism in North India and Southeast Asia. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sugimoto, Takushū 杉本 卓洲 (1978). “Kashō butsu no tō 迦葉仏の塔 [The stupa of the Buddha Kāśyapa].” Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies 印度學佛教學研究 27, no. 1: 202–06.
———(1981). “Mu’uai (shi heno shōdō) to jisatsu: genshi bukkyō ni okeru jisatsukan 無有愛(死への衝動)と自殺―原始仏教における自殺観― [Impulse toward death and suicide: the early Buddhist view of suicide].” Journal of “bukkyō fukushi” 佛教福祉 7: 4–33.
———(1993). Bosatsu: Jātaka karano tankyū 菩薩–-ジャータカからの探求–- [“Bodhisattva: Explorations of the Jātakas”]. Kyoto: Heirakuji shoten 平樂寺書店.
Takakusu, Junjirō 高楠順次郎, and Watanabe Kaikyoku 渡辺海旭, ed. Taishō shinshū daizōkyō 大正新脩大藏經. 100 vols. Tokyo: Taishō Issaikyō Kankōkai 大正一切經刊行會, 1924–34.
Takubo, Shūyo 田久保 周誉. Bombun Kujakumyō’ōkyō 梵文孔雀明王經 [Ārya Mahā-Māyūrī Vidyā-Rājñī]. Tokyo: Sankibō busshorin 山喜房佛書林, 1972.
Tamai, Tatsushi. “The Tocharian Mūgapakkha-Jūtaka.” Annual Report of The International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology at Soka University 20 (2017): 251–75.
Tanabe, Kazuko. 田辺 和子 (1981). “Paññāsa-jātaka chū no Sudhana-jātaka (I), Paññāsa-jātaka 中の Sudhana-jātaka (I) [The Sudhana-jātaka in the Paññāsa-jātaka (I).” Buddhist Studies 佛教研究 (國際佛教徒協會) 10: 99–126.
———(1983). “Paññāsa-jātaka chū no Sudhana-jātaka (II), Paññāsa-jātaka 中の Sudhana-jātaka (II) [The Sudhana-jātaka in the Paññāsa-jātaka (II)].” Buddhist Studies 佛教研究 (國際佛教徒協會) 13: 105–21.
Tatelman, Joel (2000). The Glorious Deeds of Pūrṇa: A Translation and Study of the Pūrṇāvadāna. Surrey: Curzon Press.
———(2005). The Heavenly Exploits: Buddhist Biographies from the Divyāvadāna Volume One. New York: New York University Press.
Teiser, Stephen F. Reinventing the Wheel: Paintings of Rebirth in Medieval Buddhist Temples. Seattle & London: University of Washington Press, 2006.
Tournier, Vincent. La formation du Mahāvastu et la mise en place des conceptions relatives à la carrière du bodhisattva. Paris: École française d’Extrême-Orient, 2017.
Trenckner, V., Robert Chalmers, and C.A.F. Rhys Davids. [1888–1925]. Majjhima-nikāya. 4 vols. Reprint, London: Pali Text Society, 1974–79.
Trenckner, V. et al. A Critical Pali Dictionary. 3 vols. Copenhagen: The Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters, 1924–92.
Tsai, Yao-ming 蔡 耀明. “Ji’erjite (Gilgit) fanwen fodian xieben de chutu yu fojiao yanjiu 吉爾吉特 (Gilgit) 梵文佛典寫本的出土與佛教研究 [The emergence of the Gilgit Sanskrit Buddhist manuscripts and Buddhist studies].” Zhengguan 正觀 13 (2000): 2–126.
Tsuchida, Ryūtaro. “Two Categories of Brahmins in the Early Buddhist Period.” The Memoirs of the Research Department of the Toyo Bunko 49 (1991): 51–95.
Tucci, Giuseppe. “Preliminary report on an archaeological survey in Swat.” East and West 9, no. 4 (1958): 279–328.
Vira, Raghu, and Lokesh Chandra (1959–74). Gilgit Buddhist Manuscripts. 10 vols. Śata-piṭaka Series 10. New Delhi: International Academy of Indian Culture.
———(1995). Gilgit Buddhist Manuscripts. 3 vols. Bibliotheca Indo-Buddhica Series 150–52. Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications.
Vogel, J.Ph. Indian Serpent-Lore or the Nāgas in Hindu Legend and Art. Varanasi: Indological Book House, 1972.
Vogel, Claus, and Klaus Wille (1984). “Some Hitherto Unidentified Fragments of the Pravrajyāvastu Portion of the Vinayavastu Manuscript Found Near Gilgit.” Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen, Philologisch-Historische Klasse 1984, no. 7: 299–337.
———(1992). “Some More Fragments of the Pravrajyāvastu Portion of the Vinayavastu Manuscript Found Near Gilgit.” In Sanskrit-Texte aus dem buddhistischen Kanon: Neu-entdeckungen und Neu-editionen. Folge 2: 65–109. Sanskrit-Wörterbuch der buddhistischen Texte aus den Turfan-Funden, Beiheft 4. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
———(1996).“The Final Leaves of the Pravrajyāvastu Portion of the Vinayavastu Manuscript Found Near Gilgit. Part 1: Saṃgharakṣitāvadāna.” In Sanskrit-Texte aus dem buddhistischen Kanon: Neuentdeckungen und Neueditionen. Folge 3, 241–96. Sanskrit-Wörterbuch der buddhistischen Texte aus den Turfan-Funden, Beiheft 6. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
———(2002). “The Final Leaves of the Pravrajyāvastu Portion of the Vinayavastu Manuscript Found Near Gilgit. Part 2: Nāgakumārāvadāna and Lévi Text.” In Sanskrit-Texte aus dem buddhistischen Kanon: Neuentdeckungen und Neueditionen. Folge 4, 11–76. Sanskrit-Wörterbuch der buddhistischen Texte aus den Turfan-Funden. Beiheft 9. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
———(2014). “The Pravrajyāvastu of the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya.” Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. Last visited on November 2, 2020.
Waldschmidt, Ernst (1948). “Wunderkräfte des Buddha: Eine Episode im Sanskrittext des Mahāparinirvāṇasūtra.” Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen 1948: 48–91. Reprint, Von Ceylon bis Turfan: Schriften zur Geschichte, Literatur, Religion und Kunst des indischen Kulturraumes, 120–63. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1967.
———(1950–51). Das Mahāparinirvāṇasūtra: Text in Sanskrit und Tibetisch, verglichen mit dem Pāli nebst einer Übersetzung der chinesischen Entsprechung im Vinaya der Mūlasarvāstivādins. 3 vols. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1950–51. Reprint, Kyoto: Rinsen Book Co., 1986.
———(1980). “The Rāṣṭrapālasūtra in Sanskrit Remnants from Central Asia.” Indianisme et bouddhisme: Mélanges offerts à Mgr. Étienne Lamotte, 359–74, Louvain: Université catholique de Louvain, Institut orientaliste Louvain-la-Neuve. Reprint, 1989.
———(1989). Ausgewählte kleine Schriften. Edited by Heinz Bechert und Petra Kieffer-Pülz. Stuttgart: Steiner Verlag.
Waldschmidt, Ernst et al. Sanskrit-Wörterbuch der buddhistischen Texte aus den Turfan-Funden. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1973–2018.
Walleser, Max, and Hermann Kopp. Manoratha-pūraṇī: Commentary on the Aṅguttara Nikāya. 5 vols. 1924–56. Second ed. and reprint, London: Pali Text Society, 1966–79.
Wille, Klaus (1990). Die handschriftliche Überlieferung des Vinayavastu der Mūlasarvāstivādin. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
———(2014a). “Survey of the Sanskrit Manuscripts in the Turfan Collection (Berlin).” In Harrison and Hartmann ed. 2014: 187–211.
———(2014b). “Survey of the Identified Sanskrit Manuscripts in the Hoernle, Stein, and Skrine Collections of the British Library (London).” In Harrison and Hartmann ed. 2014: 223–46.
Wogihara, Unrai. Sphuṭārthā Abhidharmakośavyākhyā. Tokyo: Sankibō Busshorin, 1936.
Wu, Juan (2016). “The Rootless Faith of Ajātaśatru and Its Explanations in the *Abhidharma-mahāvibhāṣā.” Indo-Iranian Journal 59: 101–138.
———(2017). “Parallel Stories in the Āvaśyakacūrṇi and the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya: A Preliminary Investigation.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 137, no. 2: 315–47.
Yajima, Michihiko 矢島 道彦. “Suttanipāta taiōku sakuin, Suttanipāta 対応句索引 [An index to parallel verses and padas of the Suttanipāta collected from Buddhist, Jain, and Brahmanical texts].” Bulletin of the Institute of Buddhist Culture Tsurumi University 2 (1997): A1–A97.
Yamabe, Nobuyoshi. “The Paths of Śrāvakas and Bodhisattvas in Meditative Practices.” Acta Asiatica 96 (2009): 47–75.
Yamada, Ryūjō 山田 龍城. Bongo butten no shobunken: Daijō bukkyō seiritsuron josetsu shiryōhen 梵語佛典の諸文献: 大乗佛教成立論序説 資料篇 [“Materials of Sanskrit Buddhist literature: prolegomenon to the establishment of Mahayana Buddhism”]. Kyoto: Heirakuji shoten 平樂寺書店, 1959.
Yamagiwa, Nobuyuki 山極 伸之. “Shoki bukkyō kyōdan ni okeru shoku no juyō 初期仏教教団における食の受容–-浄地をめぐる諸問題–- [The acceptance of food in the early Buddhist monastic community: problems about kappiyabhūmi/kalpikaśālā].” In Ishigami Zennō kyōju koki kinen ronbunshū: bukkyō bunka no kichō to tenkai 石上善應教授古稀記念論文集 仏教文化の基調と展開 [“Festschrift for Professor Zennō Ishigami on the occasion of his seventieth birthday: the basis and development of Buddhist culture”], 307–22, Tokyo: Sankibō busshorin 山喜房佛書林, 2001.
Yamanaka, Yukio 山中 行雄, Tsutomu Yamashita 山下 勤, Ritsu Akahane 赤羽 律, and Yasutaka Muroya 室屋 安孝 (2011). “Bukkyō bunken ‘Ryōjibyō kyō’ to sono kanren bunken ni tsuite 仏教文献『療痔病経』とその関連文献について [A study of ‘The Sūtra of the Tranquilization of Hemorrhoids’ and other relevant material].” Nihon ishigaku zasshi 日本医史学雑誌 57, no. 3: 293–304.
———(2012). “Bukkyō bunken ‘Ryōjibyō kyō’ no haikei ni tsuite 仏教文献『療痔病経』の背景について [A study of the Arśapraśamaṇisūtra: Analysis].” Nihon ishigaku zasshi 日本医史学雑誌 58, no. 1: 39–51.
Yao, Fumi 八尾 史 (2007). “Konponsetsuissaiuburitsu ni okeru kyōten inyō no mondai: Mahādevasūtra no jirei, 根本説一切有部律における経典引用の問題―Mahādevasūtraの事例 [On the Mahādevasūtra quoted in the Mūlasarvāstivāda-vinaya].” Buddhist Studies 佛教研究 (國際佛教徒協會) 35: 195–215.
———(2010). “ ‘Konponsetsuissaiuburitsu’ yakuji ni okeru kyōten ‘inyō’ no shosō: ‘Nehangyō’ taiō bubun wo chūshin ni 『根本説一切有部律』「薬事」における経典「引用」の諸相―「涅槃経」対応部分を中心に, [Sutras quoted in the Bhaiṣajyavastu of the Mūlasarvāstivāda-vinaya: with a focus on the parallel part to the Mahāparinirvāṇasūtra].” Buddhist Studies 佛教研究 (國際佛教徒協會) 38: 251–79.
———(2011). ‘Konponsetsuissaiuburitsu’ yakuji ni okeru kyōten ‘inyō’ no shosō 2, 『 根本説一切有部律』「薬事」における経典「引用」の諸相(二) [Sutras quoted in the Bhaiṣajyavastu of the Mūlasarvāstivāda-vinaya (2)].” Buddhist Studies 佛教研究 (國際佛教徒協會) 39: 179–99.
———(2012a). “ ‘Konponsetsuissaiuburitsu’ yakuji ni okeru kyōten ‘inyō’ no shosō 3, 『根本説一切有部律』「薬事」における経典「引用」の諸相(三) [Sutras quoted in the Bhaiṣajyavastu of the Mūlasarvāstivāda-vinaya (3)].” Buddhist Studies 佛教研究 40: 291–318.
———(2012b). “Problems in the sTog Palace Manuscript of the Bhaiṣajyavastu of the Mūlasarvāstivāda-vinaya.” Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies 60, no. 3: 1189–93.
———(2013a). Konponsetsuissaiuburitsu yakuji 根本説一切有部律薬事 [“The Bhaiṣajyavastu of the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya” (annotated Japanese translation)]. Tokyo: Rengō shuppan 連合出版.
———(2013b). “A Brief Note on the Newly Found Sanskrit Fragments of the Bhaiṣajyavastu of the Mūlasarvāstivāda-vinaya.” Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies 61, no. 3: 72–77.
———(2015). “A Preliminary Report on the Newly Found Sanskrit Manuscript Fragments of the Bhaiṣajyavastu of the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya.” Indian Logic 8, 289–303.
———(2017). “Dharmadinnā Becomes a Nun: A Story of Ordination by Messenger from the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya, Translated from the Tibetan version.” Asian Literature and Translation 4, no. 1: 105–48.
———(2018). “Two Sanskrit Manuscripts of the Mūlasarvāstivādin Bhaiṣajyavastu from Gilgit.” WIAS Research Bulletin 10: 91–102.
———. Forthcoming a. “Traces of Incorporation: Some Examples of the Saṃyuktāgama Sūtras in the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya.” In Research on the Saṃyukta-āgama. Taipei: Dharma Drum Publishing Corporation
———. Forthcoming b. “The Formation of the Buddha’s Former Life Stories in the Bhaiṣajyavastu of the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya.” Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 42.
Zin, Monika, (2004). “The Mūkapaṅgu Story in the Madras Government Museum: The Problem of the Textual Affiliations of the Narrative Reliefs in Amaravati and Nagarjunakonda.” Annali, Università degli studi di Napoli “L’Orientale” 64: 157–80.
———(2006a). Mitleid und Wunderkraft: Schwierige Bekehrungen und ihre Ikonographie im indischen Buddhismus. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
———(2006b). “About Two Rocks in the Buddha’s Life Story.” East and West 56, no. 4: 329–58.
———(2012). “Māndhātar, the Universal Monarch, and the Meaning of Representations of the Cakravartin in the Amaravati School, and of the Kings on the Kanaganahalli Stūpa.” In Buddhist Narrative in Asia and Beyond: In Honour of HRH Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn on Her Fifty-Fifth Birth Anniversary:149–64. Bangkok: Institute of Thai Studies, Chulalongkorn University.