- དམིགས་པ།
- དམིགས་སུ་ཡོད་པ།
- དམིགས།
- dmigs pa
- dmigs
- dmigs su yod pa
- ālambana
- upalabdhi
- upalabdha
- ālambate
- upalabhate
- upalambha
- upalabdhya
- alambhate
- ārambana
- ālambh
- Term
dmigs (pa) translates a number of Sanskrit terms, including ālambana, upalabdhi, and ālambate. These terms commonly refer to the apprehending of a subject, an object, and the relationships that exist between them. The term may also be translated as “referentiality,” meaning a system based on the existence of referent objects, referent subjects, and the referential relationships that exist between them. As part of their doctrine of “threefold nonapprehending/nonreferentiality” (’khor gsum mi dmigs pa), Mahāyāna Buddhists famously assert that all three categories of apprehending lack substantiality.
- apprehend
- དམིགས།
- dmigs
- upalabhate
Also translated here as “focus on.”
- apprehend
- དམིགས།
- dmigs
- apprehend
- དམིགས་པ།
- dmigs pa
The mental or perceptual act of cognizing or perceiving a mental object or impression that forms the basis for cognition.
- apprehending
- དམིགས་པ།
- dmigs pa
- upalambha
See “apprehend.”
- apprehending
- དམིགས།
- dmigs
- ālambana
- upalabdhi
- alambhate
dmigs (pa) translates a number of Sanskrit terms including ālambana, upalabdhi, and alambhate. These terms commonly refer to apprehending or perception both in the sense of act and object (perceiving and what is perceived). As part of their doctrine of “threefold nonapprehending/nonreferentiality” (’khor gsum mi dmigs pa), Mahāyāna Buddhists famously assert that all three categories of apprehending lack substantiality.
- apprehending
- དམིགས་པ།
- dmigs pa
- ālambana
- upalabdhi
A term for the apprehending of a subject, an object, and the relationships that exist between subjects and objects. The term might also be translated as “referentiality,” meaning a system based on the existence of referent objects, referent subjects, and the referential relationships that exist between them. As part of their doctrine of “threefold non-apprehending/non-referentiality” (’khor gsum mi dmigs pa), Mahāyāna Buddhists famously assert that all three categories of apprehending lack substantiality.
- apprehension
- དམིགས་པ།
- dmigs pa
- ālambana
- upalabdhi
A term for the apprehension of a subject, an object, and the relationships that exist between subjects and objects. The term might also be translated as “referentiality,” meaning a system based on the existence of referent objects, referent subjects, and the referential relationships that exist between them. As part of their doctrine of “threefold non-apprehension/non-referentiality” (’khor gsum mi dmigs pa), Mahāyāna Buddhists famously assert that all three categories of apprehension lack substantiality.
- apprehension
- དམིགས་པ།
- dmigs pa
- upalabdhi
A conceptual, dualistic perception.
- objective support
- དམིགས་པ།
- dmigs pa
- ālambana
- ārambana
- objective support
- དམིགས་པ།
- dmigs pa
- ālambana
- ārambana
- apprehended
- དམིགས་པ།
- dmigs pa
- upalabdha
- ālambana
- apprehensible
- དམིགས་སུ་ཡོད་པ།
- dmigs su yod pa
- upalabdhya
- upalabdha
See “apprehend.”
- focus
- དམིགས་པ།
- dmigs pa
- upalabdhi
Also translated “reference point” q.v.
- focus on
- དམིགས།
- dmigs
- ālambh
The Tibetan can translate both a noun (ālambana) and a related verb (in which case the third person singular is ālambate, “[one] perceives or conceives [something] as having an objective basis”). This term is tied to the general idea that an act of sense perception or mental conception takes an object of some kind that forms the basis or support for its continuing perception or conception.
- objects of perception
- དམིགས་པ།
- dmigs pa
- ālambana
See “apprehension.”
- perception
- དམིགས་པ།
- dmigs pa
- ālambana
- purpose
- དམིགས་པ།
- dmigs pa
- ālambana
In the Potala manuscript, the term is rendered as ārambaṇa, which is an equivalent term in Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit.
- reference point
- དམིགས་པ།
- dmigs pa
- upalabdhi
Conceptual mind. Also translated “focus” q.v.