The Rite for Destroying is a brief instructional manual on how to perform a wrathful burnt offering ritual. Rites for destroying are one of four types of tantric rituals undertaken to attain worldly or spiritual accomplishments. Authorities in imperial-period Tibet apparently regarded this ritual with apprehension, resulting in its excision from The Tantra Purifying Bad Rebirths.
This text was translated by Patrick Lambelet. Many thanks to José Cabezón for his guidance, to the UC Santa Barbara Department of Religious Studies, and to Rory Lindsay and Nathaniel Rich for their valuable support and patience.
The translation was completed under the patronage and supervision of the 84000–UC Santa Barbara Buddhist Texts Translation Initiative. Rory Lindsay edited the translation and the introduction, and Ven. Konchog Norbu copyedited the text. Martina Cotter was in charge of the digital publication process.
The Rite for Destroying consists of brief instructions for a homa, or burnt offering, a tantric Buddhist ritual performed for worldly or spiritual accomplishments (siddhi; dngos grub). The text first describes the appropriate environment in which to conduct this practice, followed by the dimensions of the fire pit, the substances used to construct it, and the symbols to be drawn upon it. Instructions on the actual performance of the rite are extremely brief; presumably the practitioner would need to draw on previous training in ritual or refer to other texts to supply the elements common to burnt offering rites in general.
The substances to be offered in the actual ritual, as with the other elements, are all associated with acts of violence and destruction—substances such as flesh, blood (presumably human),1 iron filings, powdered bones, poison, mustard seed, feces, and urine. Once the ritualist has invited Agni, the god of fire, they are instructed to make offerings to him one hundred thousand times. Upon the conclusion of the practice, it is said that the persons or beings toward whom the ritual is directed will suffer numerous misfortunes both in this life and the next.
The Rite for Destroying is positioned in the Degé Kangyur between the two translations of The Tantra Purifying Bad Rebirths (Toh 483 and Toh 485). The placement of this text reflects the belief among Tibetan scholars that authorities censored this rite during the imperial period, removing it from the first translation of The Tantra Purifying Bad Rebirths.2 According to some Tibetan accounts, the passage on the rite for destroying was never translated from the Sanskrit original; others argue that while this passage had indeed been translated, it was not included in the official Tibetan version, although it may have been inserted as needed in certain ritual contexts.3
Whatever the case may be, Weinberger has argued that The Tantra Purifying Bad Rebirths and other tantric works underwent a type of “sanitization.”4 Violent rituals were either selectively translated or censored when such translations were completed in the eighth and ninth centuries. During the later dissemination of Buddhism to Tibet, reform-minded Tibetan rulers such as Lha Lama Yeshé Ö (lha bla ma ye shes ’od, 947–1019/1024) sought to limit the translation and dissemination of antinomian tantric texts and to purge what they saw as apocryphal Tibetan tantric traditions. Gray has also noted that only a fraction of the texts containing violent ritual practices were transmitted to East Asia, and when they were, the offensive passages were edited or removed entirely.5
This translation is based on the Degé block print and the Comparative Edition (dpe bsdur ma). The colophon states that the text was translated by the Indian abbot Śāntiṃgarbha (a.k.a. Śāntigarbha) and the translator Bandé Jayarakṣita, both of whom are also credited as translators of the first version of the Sarvadurgatipariśodhana Tantra.

So ends “The Rite for Destroying.”
Translated by the Indian abbot Śāntiṃgarbha11 and the translator Bandé Jayarakṣita. May all be auspicious.12

The Rite for Destroying is a brief instructional manual on how to perform a wrathful burnt offering ritual. Rites for destroying are one of four types of tantric rituals undertaken to attain worldly or spiritual accomplishments. Authorities in imperial-period Tibet apparently regarded this ritual with apprehension, resulting in its excision from The Tantra Purifying Bad Rebirths.
This text was translated by Patrick Lambelet. Many thanks to José Cabezón for his guidance, to the UC Santa Barbara Department of Religious Studies, and to Rory Lindsay and Nathaniel Rich for their valuable support and patience.
The translation was completed under the patronage and supervision of the 84000–UC Santa Barbara Buddhist Texts Translation Initiative. Rory Lindsay edited the translation and the introduction, and Ven. Konchog Norbu copyedited the text. Martina Cotter was in charge of the digital publication process.
The Rite for Destroying consists of brief instructions for a homa, or burnt offering, a tantric Buddhist ritual performed for worldly or spiritual accomplishments (siddhi; dngos grub). The text first describes the appropriate environment in which to conduct this practice, followed by the dimensions of the fire pit, the substances used to construct it, and the symbols to be drawn upon it. Instructions on the actual performance of the rite are extremely brief; presumably the practitioner would need to draw on previous training in ritual or refer to other texts to supply the elements common to burnt offering rites in general.
The substances to be offered in the actual ritual, as with the other elements, are all associated with acts of violence and destruction—substances such as flesh, blood (presumably human),1 iron filings, powdered bones, poison, mustard seed, feces, and urine. Once the ritualist has invited Agni, the god of fire, they are instructed to make offerings to him one hundred thousand times. Upon the conclusion of the practice, it is said that the persons or beings toward whom the ritual is directed will suffer numerous misfortunes both in this life and the next.
The Rite for Destroying is positioned in the Degé Kangyur between the two translations of The Tantra Purifying Bad Rebirths (Toh 483 and Toh 485). The placement of this text reflects the belief among Tibetan scholars that authorities censored this rite during the imperial period, removing it from the first translation of The Tantra Purifying Bad Rebirths.2 According to some Tibetan accounts, the passage on the rite for destroying was never translated from the Sanskrit original; others argue that while this passage had indeed been translated, it was not included in the official Tibetan version, although it may have been inserted as needed in certain ritual contexts.3
Whatever the case may be, Weinberger has argued that The Tantra Purifying Bad Rebirths and other tantric works underwent a type of “sanitization.”4 Violent rituals were either selectively translated or censored when such translations were completed in the eighth and ninth centuries. During the later dissemination of Buddhism to Tibet, reform-minded Tibetan rulers such as Lha Lama Yeshé Ö (lha bla ma ye shes ’od, 947–1019/1024) sought to limit the translation and dissemination of antinomian tantric texts and to purge what they saw as apocryphal Tibetan tantric traditions. Gray has also noted that only a fraction of the texts containing violent ritual practices were transmitted to East Asia, and when they were, the offensive passages were edited or removed entirely.5
This translation is based on the Degé block print and the Comparative Edition (dpe bsdur ma). The colophon states that the text was translated by the Indian abbot Śāntiṃgarbha (a.k.a. Śāntigarbha) and the translator Bandé Jayarakṣita, both of whom are also credited as translators of the first version of the Sarvadurgatipariśodhana Tantra.

So ends “The Rite for Destroying.”
Translated by the Indian abbot Śāntiṃgarbha11 and the translator Bandé Jayarakṣita. May all be auspicious.12

Leonard van der Kuijp deals with these questions in greater detail in “Notes Apropos of the Transmission of the Sarvadurgatipariśodhana-tantra in Tibet,” pp. 115–17.
Following the belief among Tibetan scholars that this text was excised from the earlier translation of The Tantra Purifying Bad Rebirths, the present work could be inserted at folio 95.a of the Degé version of that tantra, just prior to the final praises. We have added quotation marks to this translation to reflect that this teaching is given by Vajrapāṇi, who has taken the form of Vajrasattva at this point in the tantra.
We have been unable to determine the meaning of lugs phye. Clearly it is some kind of powder (phye). Some dictionary entries for lugs mention casting or founding, as of metal, so this could be a type of metallic powder. It appears in other tantric sources: the Āryavajrapātālanāmatantrarāja (’phags pa rdo rje sa ’og gi rgyud kyi rgyal po), says lugs phye bsres pa las gzugs brnyan byas la… (Hemis 687: vol. 92, folio 134.b.5).
The term rtse gsum simply means “three-pronged,” or trident; it may also refer to a three-pronged vajra.
The general procedure for burnt offering rituals is to cast the ritual substances into the fire a set number of times while reciting a specific mantra. Thus, “meditate and perform the fire offering one hundred thousand times” most likely means one should perform the mantra and offering one hundred thousand times, not the entire ritual.
The Degé and Lhasa editions have “Śantiṃgarbha,” a variant spelling of Śāntigarbha. The Comparative Edition reads “Śīntaṃgarbha,” which is a misspelling.

This refers to Agni, the Vedic deity of fire, who is also invoked in Buddhist burnt offering rituals.
The casting of a prescribed offering into a ritual fire. The practice of homa is first attested in pre-Buddhist Vedic literature, and serves as a core, pervasive ritual paradigm in exoteric and esoteric rites in both Buddhist and non-Buddhist traditions into modern times. In Buddhist esoteric rites, the ritual offerings are made repeatedly, with each offering accompanied by a single repetition of the respective mantra.
A cremation ground, or place for discarded corpses, which is frequently described as a type of power place where yogins and yoginīs congregate.
Wooden sticks used for offering in a burnt offering ritual.
A ritual substance the identity of which is unclear.
Brassica juncea or Sisymbrium heteromallum.
The perimeter marking the outer edge of the area in which the substances are offered during the rite.
The ritual platform used in a burnt offering rite.
A class of nonhuman beings that are often, but certainly not always, considered demonic in the Buddhist tradition. They are often depicted as flesh-eating monsters who haunt frightening places and are ugly and evil-natured with a yearning for human flesh, and who additionally have miraculous powers, such as being able to change their appearance.
Rorippa indica or Sisymbrium heteromallum.
The ring outside the perimeter.
One of the standard epithets of the buddhas. A recurrent explanation offers three different meanings for su- that are meant to show the special qualities of “accomplishment of one’s own purpose” (svārthasampad) for a complete buddha. Thus, the Sugata is “well” gone, as in the expression su-rūpa (“having a good form”); he is gone “in a way that he shall not come back,” as in the expression su-naṣṭa-jvara (“a fever that has utterly gone”); and he has gone “without any remainder” as in the expression su-pūrṇa-ghaṭa (“a pot that is completely full”). According to Buddhaghoṣa, the term means that the way the Buddha went (Skt. gata) is good (Skt. su) and where he went (Skt. gata) is good (Skt. su).
mngon spyod kyi las (*Abhicārakarman). Toh 484, Degé Kangyur vol. 85 (rgyud, ta), folio 96.a.3–7.
mngon spyod kyi las (*Abhicārakarman). bka’ ’gyur (dpe bsdur ma) [Comparative Edition of the Kangyur], krung go’i bod rig pa zhib ’jug ste gnas kyi bka’ bstan dpe sdur khang (The Tibetan Tripitaka Collation Bureau of the China Tibetology Research Center). 108 volumes. Beijing: krung go’i bod rig pa dpe skrun khang (China Tibetology Publishing House), 2006–9, vol. 38, pp. 275–76.
Gray, David B. “Compassionate Violence? On the Ethical Implications of Tantric Buddhist Ritual.” Journal of Buddhist Ethics 14 (2007): 239–71.
Lindsay, Rory. Saving the Dead: Tibetan Funerary Rituals in the Tradition of the Sarvadurgatipariśodhana Tantra. Vienna: Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde, 2024.
van der Kuijp, Leonard. “Notes Apropos of the Transmission of the Sarvadurgatipariśodhana-tantra in Tibet.” Studien zur Indologie und Iranistik 16 (1992): 109–25.
Weinberger, Steven. “The Yoga Tantras and the Social Context of Their Transmission to Tibet.” Chung-Hwa Buddhist Journal 23 (2010): 131–66.
